Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Three - Flight Of United 93 is here!
|
Government secrecy, conflicting information and improper investigations brings you the third Chapter of the Pandora's Black Box series - Flight Of United 93. Based on data and information provided by the government, Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyzes the conflicts with the government story regarding the events surrounding United Flight 93 as it departed Newark enroute to San Francisco, CA on September 11, 2001. Analysis includes NTSB animation, witnesses, reported impact, parts discovered and more. Included free as an extra is the entire flight uncut, unedited as provided by the NTSB which includes cockpit voice recordings A Must See! Order the high quality DVD now in our DVD section. Scroll to bottom and save with the 5 pack special. Excellent gift for the holidays. Thank you for your support.
|
.
|
- rob balsamo's blog
- Login to post comments
'Buy our DVD'?
That's your message?
That's a bit of a misrepresentation
People need to get over this "money" thing with regard to 9/11 Truth and Justice activism.
ALL activist organizations NEED money to survive and thrive, otherwise they wither and die, and/or do not accomplish much.
It's the same with Animal Welfare and Animal Rights groups, Environmental Rights groups, Civil Rights groups, Equal Rights groups, and all other non-profit and not-for-profit charitable organizations.
It should be common sense, but skepters like to use that as an attack ("they're only doing it to make money!!!"), which is completely fallacious (but is a good sound bite for the idiots who want to believe it), and sometimes Truthers fall into that trap, as well.
We should be encouraging groups to increase their income, any way they can do so, so they can function better and accomplish more. And we should be supporting them as much as possible. Because if we don't do it, no one else will.
People who think "no one should make any money in regard to 9/11 Truth and Justice" are naive, clueless, skepteristic (read: worthless), and/or the like.
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist
It doesn't matter what people are saying, as long as they are talking about you. — Denny Crane
Bring back the 80's! — Nuke the Gay Iranian Whales!
Thank you
Thanks doughnut... well said.
We are up against multi-billion dollar propaganda machines such as Fox News and CNN. We can use all the support we can get. It takes capital to combat this infowar. Imagine if the patriot community had the budget of Fox or CNN. The world would certainly be more stable im sure. As it is, we are barely raising enough funds to operate currently. We thank you for your support.
Rob
http://pilotsfor911truth.org
http://forums.pilotsfor911truth.org
I ordered!
I appreciate the work you are doing.
The research on Flight 77 is a great contribution to the whole.
I look forward to more awesome revelations about 93.
Not only do I purchase most (the best) books and DVDs to support the
researchers and filmmakers but as a way of arming myself with
info to be more effective at alerting others.
Like many here in the movement I have invested thou$and$ in getting the word out.
Our group has made and distributed over 11,000 DVDs.
IF NOT ME. WHO?
IF NOT NOW. WHEN?
Years ago I came upon this short quote from A COURSE IN MIRACLES.
"You are entrusted with the world's release from pain."
meditate on that.
NTSB animation
“The NTSB ‘animation’… is in fact at least 20 degrees off from the Black Box data it's supposed to be based on.”
http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/2007/02/flight-data-recorder.html
Many believe that there was a flyover even though there is no flyover on the Double Tree Hotel video and an amateur video 15 seconds after the attack. http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/pentagon-flyover-theory-rip.html
"Fortunately, there is an amateur video taken from I-395 beginning ~15 seconds post-impact with which to further develop the timeline." http://911files.info/77/fdr_analysis/Final%20Analysis%20of%20NTSB%20Figh...
Russell Pickering:
“I have witnesses with footage of the area behind the Pentagon at the moment of impact that I have talked to in great detail. They had three cameras running. They SWEAR that nothing flew over the building. So who is right? The video shows that if your imaginary flyover happened the plane would have had to go significantly south. There were multiple people there watching. NOTHING flew over according to them.”
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3854&...
______________________________
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com
Arab
What does this blog entry on UA93 research have to do with the NTSB produced flight path for AA77? The one in which the NTSB refuses to correct, retract, comment but felt the need to disclose the error in the clock annotation....?
I know you like to derail threads and spend most of your time as a critic of others hard work instead of going out into the field yourself doing actual research... but could we perhaps stick to topic?
As for Pickerings quote.. i can do that too...
I know a guy who knows a guy who i spoke to in detail who said he went to Mars and had a beer with Elvis.
By the way.. a C-130 and a 747 flew over the building according to reports and videos. A far cry from "Nothing" as claimed by your hearsay quote without source..
back on topic..
some comments here from people who have seen the film...
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=10026&vi...
Joe, thank you for your support.
Rob
http://pilotsfor911truth.org
http://forums.pilotsfor911truth.org
Pentagon 15 seconds after the attack
Sorry for "derailing"... Here's the shot of the Pentagon 15 seconds after the attack.
http://911files.info/77/fdr_analysis/Final%20Analysis%20of%20NTSB%20Figh...
Critique is valuable, and if we are serious about the truth about 9/11, we should welcome criticism to improve our theories and reject unsupported ones. Critique is part of the scientific peer-review method. I certainly have no problem with being criticized and improving my research to present the best possible case for 9/11 being an inside job. After all, what's there to be afraid of? Being wrong?
There are no direct witnesses of a flyover, and neither is there a flyover in any of these videos. I have read every single witness statement on the record, and I have conducted my own painstaking "hard work" into this matter. Which witness by name are you referring to? As you can see from this highway shot, there would have been far more than one witness to any "flyover", and any such attempt would have been seen by witnesses and potentially video recording and cameras. The C-130 can also be seen in the top video, and you can see from the very beginning that the smoke has yet to reach the top of the screen. http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/pentagon-flyover-theory-rip.html
______________________________
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com
Sorry for derailing?
I don't think so. You have a bug up your butt about a different topic and won't let it go. You aren't "sorry" at all.
More than 15 seconds imo
That looks like more than 15 seconds after the attack to me, just based on the size of the cloud.
Of course, even if it was around 15 seconds after the attack, I suggest that doesn't mean much. A plane going at high speed can travel a very long distance in 15 seconds.
If my calculations are correct, a plane going at 400mph would travel well over a mile in 15 seconds. (almost 2 miles)
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist
It doesn't matter what people are saying, as long as they are talking about you. — Denny Crane
Bring back the 80's! — Nuke the Gay Iranian Whales!
Here comes the anonymous disinfobot.
I am outraged and disgusted that the owner of 911blogger allows you to post here. You are anonymous and destructive with the amount faulty information you peddle. You keep coming back, over and over and over, as if when you are corrected it never happened. Now you are trying to derail threads with your spam. I am going to contact him about this. This is outrageous.
“The NTSB ‘animation’… is in fact at least 20 degrees off from the Black Box data it's supposed to be based on.”
http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/2007/02/flight-data-recorder.html
HOW HIGH WAS THE PLANE ARABESQUE????? WHY DOES THE ANIMATION SHOW THE PLANE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CITGO? WHY ARE YOU *NOT* FOCUSING ON THE PROBLEMS IN THE DATA??? WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO DISTRACT EVERYONE? I THINK EVERYONE KNOWS WHY.
Many believe that there was a flyover even though there is no flyover on the Double Tree Hotel video and an amateur video 15 seconds after the attack. http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/pentagon-flyover-theory-rip.htm...“
Nope. First of all, that video was confiscated, sequestered, controlled, and released by the perpetrators for intents and purposes. Second, the video does not show anything conclusive with the trees in the way. Third, they manipluated the gate camera videos, so what makes this one exempt from the same treatment? Fourth, look closely some believe the object seen in the video IS the plane and if you notice it appears to keep traveling AFTER the fireball.
The flyover IS not a theory. It is a logical alternative based on the evidence. THE PLANE APPROACHED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CITGO, DID NOT LOOK LIKE AN AA, AND PULLED UP IN ASCENT OVER THE HIGHWAY HEADED TOWARD THE PENTAGON. When are you going to take your mask off and come out from the shadows and speak with witnesses? Why won't you accept that the plane was on the north side of the Citgo? Why won't you accept that there was a bogus cover story of a second plane/jet (that WAS NOT the C-130) veeering away from the pentagon at the time of the explosion??? Why won't you speak with Lagasse, Brooks, Turcios, Paik, Stephens? Sgt Brooks was there and told me that our movie was an eye opener, he told us that "anything was possible" when it came to being fooled about the impact. How come you can't accept that you may be wrong? Why do you continue on this bizarre anonymous mission of yours? You don't think you look like COINTEL?
Because you have a mission and an agenda.
“Fortunately, there is an amateur video taken from I-395 beginning ~15 seconds post-impact with which to further develop the timeline." http://911files.info/77/fdr_analysis/Final%20Analysis%20of%20NTSB%20Figh...
15 seconds? Really? Where did you get this information? Did you confirm it? And your pal Russell Pickering said it was 60 seconds after. You can't even tell that it is the C-130. In fact it isn't. It is a helicopter. the C-130 came in and FLEW OVER the pentagon, crossed over the Potomac, and over the tidal basin where it climed and flew to the north. It did not reach the Pentagon and fly off west. That is WELL OVER 15 seconds after the event.
Russell Pickering:
“I have witnesses with footage of the area behind the Pentagon at the moment of impact that I have talked to in great detail. They had three cameras running. They SWEAR that nothing flew over the building. So who is right? The video shows that if your imaginary flyover happened the plane would have had to go significantly south. There were multiple people there watching. NOTHING flew over according to them.”
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3854&...
This is what makes you and Russell Pickering glaringly bad disinfo.
Where are these witnesses? WHERE ARE THEY??? There are none, you liars.
This is what you people do, you leave ambiguous bs floating around out there for desperate, unresearched non-believers and fence sitters to latch onto.
Where is that scumbag Russell Pickering now? Where is he? Where are these witnesses?
See, I actually confirm things. I speak with witnesses and present their information. I don't make vague declarations and let them linger, later using them as "proof".
You are a joke.
So did Bob Pugh have dinner with us, give us his footage from that day and praise us because we are wild eyed conspiracy theorists? What about the enlisted officer rescue/recovery who wrote us a letter of appreciation bought us dinner, gave us a midnight tour of the Pentagon? What about April Gallop? Are they wrong? They were there. YOU were NOT. They are real people with real names. YOU are NOT.
In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or nation. A person who commits treason is known as a traitor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
...and you know what happens to traitors.
Great job Rob, as usual.
Again, we can all take a page out of Rob's book. A true American patriot and a true researcher/investigator.
Much respect brother. Keep up the incredible work.
Lots of Excellent Info in the DVD. GET IT!
Lots of Excellent Info in the DVD. GET IT!
I'm watching now.