T. Carter - parapolitical investigator and 911 stewardess
Anomaly Tue, 11/13/2007 - 12:02pm
Parapolitical Resarcher John Judge introduces fellow researcher and 911 flight stewardess witness on September 11th and the Pentagon attack.
- Anomaly's blog
- Login to post comments
She is not a witness and this is not evidence.
1. What is her name? He introduces her without even saying her name!
2. She is not a witness. She does not claim to have seen the plane or the Pentagon. You can not see the Pentagon from Alexandria. It might have been possible for her to hear the explosion but the notion that her building "shook" strains credulity and even if it did this proves nothing.
3. The bracelet proves nothing. The suspect gave her the bracelet. There is no proof where it came from. The DNA evidence is invalid as well because it was controlled and provided for solely by the suspect. There is nothing to prove the chain of custody of the DNA or the bracelet she is referring to was not broken or that either were ever in the Pentagon at all. Trusting the government's word on this information clearly defeats the entire purpose of investigating 9/11 to begin with.
John Judge's credibility is shot right off the bat when he claims that out of 184 deaths at the Pentagon that only "15 or 20" were from inside the building and the rest were from renovation workers outside of the building and people on the plane.
I have only heard of 1 person at most who "might" have been killed outside while 125 people were killed inside the building.
This information does NOTHING to help expose the Pentagon deception and only serves to muddy the waters with completely irrelevant and useless information that reeks of being fabricated anyway.
Thanks for nothing John Judge
www.ThePentaCon.com
ummmm ok....
I see on his site how her name is allegedly "T Carter" and he refers to her simply as T.
That is not a name it is an initial and she is just as good as anonymous.
It was quite odd and noticeably awkward the way he simply pointed at her with a command to speak without even introducing her.
She is a fellow "researcher" into the JFK and MLK assassinations even before 9/11 and was close enough with John Judge to be in communication with him on that day.
Talk about fishy.
www.ThePentaCon.com
She's Never Heard of You, Either
But she's apparently quite well-known in the JFK/MLK conspiracy theory community:
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/COPAnov2003.html
"Speakers include Bill Kelly, Philip Melanson, T Carter, Cynthia McKinney, Dick Gregory"
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/COPAnov2001.html
"T Carter
a brilliant researcher who has worked on both JFK and MLK cases with Judge Joe Brown, among others. She will give an update on the MLK case, and a workshop on lobbying Congress for oversight hearings on the ARRB. "
so?
T is not a name.
She is essentially anonymous.
I am not anonymous. I am a real person with a real name who presents real evidence.
She was not a witness to the event in any way.
This is not evidence for anything whatsoever EVEN IF she is telling the truth.
www.ThePentaCon.com
This lady may not have given
This lady may not have given her name, but her testimony sounds credible to me.
As for you, Mr. Craig Ranke CIT, when are you and the other no-Pentagon-planers going to answer the obvious questions arising from your ideas?
-What happened to the real AAL77 if it didn't hit the Pentagon? How could a plane and its passengers be made to disappear without leaving a trace?
-If AAL77 didn't hit the Pentagon, how are hundreds of FEMA workers who cleaned up the site being kept quiet about what they saw and didn't see? That'd be quite a hush-up job, wouldn't it?
-And the biggest question of all: what was the motive of the conspirators to pull of such a ridiculous switcharoo, when they had already shown they could commandeer three airplanes and fly two of them into buildings? Why on earth would they have chosen such a complicated, ridiculous scenario for AAL77, involving magically switching AAL77 and somehow making it disappear into thin air, then have all sorts of witnesses lie about what they saw hit the Pentagon building? Why would they do this when they had clearly infiltrated NEADS, and could be sure no fighters would be dispatched to shoot down their commandeered craft?
You've never answered these questions, and you never will. I thought we had, as a movement, moved beyond the no-plane nonsense, but I guess since wherever there are no videos available-- such as the Pentagon and Shanksville-- there will be someone to push the no-plane snake oil.
It doesn't matter if she is "credible".
Or if she is telling the truth because NOTHING she says supports the notion that a 757 hit the Pentagon or counters the evidence proving otherwise.
Just like your straw men argument questions.
>>>>>>>>>-What happened to the real AAL77 if it didn't hit the Pentagon? How could a plane and its passengers be made to disappear without leaving a trace?
You better start demanding an answer to that question from the perpetrators because we now have proof that it did not hit the building. It is not my responsibility to answer that question just because I have provided enough evidence to prove the plane did not cause the physical damage.
>>>>>>If AAL77 didn't hit the Pentagon, how are hundreds of FEMA workers who cleaned up the site being kept quiet about what they saw and didn't see? That'd be quite a hush-up job, wouldn't it?
Actually we have spoken with a fire captain who states emphatically that he doesn't believe a plane hit and a recovery worker who has his doubts. Not to mention victim April Gallop who also questions the official story. But most probably accept the official excuse that the entire jet disintegrated leaving only a few parts and scraps. Not much hush up required since the government does not claim there were any more pieces found other than what has been shown in the images.
>>>>-And the biggest question of all: what was the motive of the conspirators to pull of such a ridiculous switcharoo, when they had already shown they could commandeer three airplanes and fly two of them into buildings?
Surgical precision of the damage to their own headquarters that they obviously did not plan to completely demolish like they did the WTC.
It makes perfect sense.
Same exact M.O......real planes used as psychological tools while the actual destruction was implemented covertly with pre-planted explosives.
Now cut it with the pointless straw men questions that do nothing to refute the evidence proving a military deception.
www.ThePentaCon.com