ae911truth.org: Richard Gage, AIA to debate "explosives expert" on radio show

Richard Gage, AIA will debate Ron Craig, a member of the International Society of Explosives Engineers, on the "collapse" of the 3 WTC buildings, Monday, November 12, 2007 at 8:00 p.m. PST.

The interviewer/host is Richard Syrett, of The Richard Syrett Show, on Newstalk 1010, Toronto, Canada.

More information:


 
http://www.ae911truth.org/appearances.php

Richard Gage Audio Clips Plus One

October 24, 2007 Richard Gage on Drive Time Radio
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20071024_WTIC_richardgage.mp3

September 6, 2007 Richard Gage on the Alex Jones show
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20070906_alexjones_richardgage.mp3

October 31, 2007 Former DEA Region Chief Discusses Funding Mechanism for "Fun and Games" Division of the National Insanity Apparatus
(National Petroleum Radio)
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20071031_NPR_castillo.

Thanks alexjonefan

Your information is always good.

Thanks for the efforts you are providing in providing this vital information.

Pls keep up the good work.

We need more constructive efforts such as this.

Regards.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Keeping things on the surface

I'm operating under the assumption that new people are finding this site and may not have heard the interviews.

And . . . I appreciate your support. My effort is modest . The war on terror narrative is burned into our fellow citizen's minds. Repetition lodged the stories and repetition will now dislodge them.

Don't be angry because your friends and family are terrified. Giving up one's foundational mythologies is like giving up heroin or crack. If you can allow them to be angry at you and respect their anger you will have done a great service.

My father, the retired therapist, who once called me obsessed with conspiracy theories now wears his 9/11 was an inside job T-Shirt. I sent him "Shock Doctrine" and he read it in two days and told me, "I used to think that they were just screwing up in Iraq but now I know it is all part of a plan, it all makes sense".

Jason Bermas suggests we buy/copy Loosechange Final Cut and watch it with our families during holiday gatherings. Just remember to let family members get angry at you for bringing this to the surface. Work on your "mirroring" techniques. When they call you nuts, say to them, "I hear that you're angry at me." If one person is angry and another person listens to them, that is productive. If both people are angry, then its a food fight.

. . . . at which Mohamed Atta was enrolled

DEA Affidavit concerning Learjet owned by Wally Hilliard's PlaneOneLeasing. He was also financier of the flight school, Huffman Aviation, at which Mohamed Atta was enrolled.

Chicago Public Radio (something is happening in the Windy City!)
http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/Slideshow.aspx?slideshowID=14&photoID=72

Also:
This is Daniel Hopsicker's expertise . . . he was interviewed by NPR
http://www.madcowprod.com

This is all connected. The firings of the US attornies was because one the the prosecutors in San Diego was closing in on this operation. Porter Goss was fired a couple of weeks after a plane painted up like a homeland security plane crashed in Mexico with 5.5 tons of cocaine.

Can anyone

provide more information on Ron Craig?

==================================================================
"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)

Ron Craig

Here is a short bio on Ron Craig. Any info on the company that he worked for or a list of his demolition clients would be particularly helpful! Thanks!

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

Ron is a member of the International Society of Explosives Engineers, and the International Association of Bomb Technicians and Investigators. In addition, he is a Certified Class 1 and 2 High Explosive Blaster. He has taken 6 courses on Advanced Improvised Explosive Devices, and lectures to Police and Military bomb squads on improvised explosive and incendiary devices. He also lecture to CSI police officers on homemade explosives and booby trap devices. Finally, Ron is a Professor at Ryerson University, where he teaches a course in Explosives and Pyrotechnics.

He believes the World Trade Center DID NOT collapse because of a controlled demolition.
He is also Vice President of The Toronto Film College

www.torontofilmcollege.ca

Good Luck Richard Gage...

I will be definitely listening and supporting you 100% !!!

Gordon Ross will have a few good tips if you need them...

Many thanks for all you do, best wishes

More Ron Craig Bio & Why We MUST PERSIST

Ron Craig

Diploma
Humber College, Toronto
Post Graduate
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Post Graduate
University of Michigan

Ron is an experienced Special Effects Supervisor with over 20 years experience. He has worked on over 85 feature films, 8 television series and numerous commercials. Ron has worked on projects with major studios such as Paramount, HBO, CBS, NBC, and Warner Brothers. Ron is also an experienced instructor, university professor, member of the International Association of Bomb Technicians and Investigators, and member of the Society for Explosives Engineers.

E-mail : rcraig@torontofilmcollege.ca

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Films he has worked on

http://imdb.com/name/nm0185998/

Ron Craig

Filmography

Special Effects:

Irish Eyes (2004) (special effects coordinator)
... aka Vendetta: No Conscience, No Mercy (International: English title: video title) (USA: new title)
Wish You Were Dead (2002) (special effects supervisor)
Blue Hill Avenue (2001) (special effects coordinator)
A Friday Night Date (2000) (TV) (special effects supervisor)
... aka Rage au volant, La (Canada: French title)
... aka Road Rage (USA)
The Highwayman (2000) (special effects coordinator)

Grizzly Falls (1999) (special effects coordinator)
... aka Grizzly Falls (Canada: French title)
Striking Poses (1999) (special effects coordinator)
Blind (1999) (special effects)
Blackheart (1998) (special effects)
Men with Guns (1997/I) (special effects)
Tiger Claws II (1997) (special effects)
Sabotage (1996) (special effects coordinator)
Expect No Mercy (1996) (key special effects)
Memory Run (1996) (special effects coordinator)
... aka Synapse
Salt Water Moose (1996) (special effects coordinator)
Spill (1996) (special effects coordinator)
... aka Acid Death (Europe: English title: video title)
... aka Virus (Canada: English title: TV title)
Iron Eagle IV (1995) (special effects coordinator)
... aka Aigle de fer IV (Canada: French title)
Jungleground (1995) (special effects coordinator)
Death Wish V: The Face of Death (1994) (special effects)
... aka Death Wish 5: The Face of Death (UK: video box title)
... aka Death Wish: The Face of Death (USA: DVD box title)
Back in Action (1994) (special effects designer)
... aka Coup de force (Canada: French title)
TC 2000 (1993) (special effects)
The Adjuster (1991) (special effects assistant)
... aka Expert en sinistres, L' (Canada: French title)
Abraxas, Guardian of the Universe (1991) (special effects)
... aka Abraxas
Baby on Board (1991) (special effects)
Murder Blues (1990) (practical special effects)
... aka Dead Certain

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pls, Mr Gage remember when you are debating, this is what was done through manipulation and deceit.

Thanks to 911 and the lies that led to the 911 Wars.

John William Anderson, who was born on July 4, 2001, is on TSA's watch list. He was first stopped in 2004 when his mother and grandmother took him on his first plane ride to Disney World.

15,000 want off the U.S. terror watch list : http://911blogger.com/node/12418

Remember Why We Must Persist. The 911 Wars. Innocent Blood. 911 TRUTH vs Tyranny.
http://911blogger.com/node/12397

Remember the liars that they are:

Made you into a Liar Mr Bush! KEITH OLBERMANN on MSNBC
http://911blogger.com/node/12389

One footnote: 911 WAS A BIG "HOLLYWOOD" PRODUCTION - A PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION WITH HIGH PROPOGANDA VALUES IN ORDER TO LAUNCH THE PROJECT FOR A NEW "AMERICAN" CENTURY.

SOME PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE FILM INDUSTRY MAY ALSO BE INVOLVED IN ORDER TO KEEP THE MYTH ALIVE.

REMEMBER FOX (FAUX) NEWS AND FOX STUDIOS, Rupert Murdoch, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_Century_Fox

This is what Fox News- by default FOX STUDIOS," Hollywood's" 20th Century Fox thinks of 911 Truth.

Geraldo Rivera gave the "9/11 Truth" The Finger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_l1LvSoD48

These are the comments by the creator of the video:

I'm the original camera man who caught this footage at the right time using my weapon, it's called: Canon XHA1

"On The Scene News" was there when Geraldo Rivera gave 9/11 Truthers the Finger.

That middle finger is a clear sign of what Geraldo Rivera and FoxNews think of all who don't conform to their twisted way of thinking concerning the official cover-up story of 9/11.

Research, study and open your mind to the Truth.
Added: September 09, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pls be motivated and be alert for the spin, lies and distortions by the gatekeepers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Why are you using a picture

Why are you using a picture of a Phoenix Police officer that was in a fire from being rear ended while in his police car as being part of 9/11????

Please do not include that picture in any more postings trying to relate that to 9/11.....

This type of thing is what the ney sayers will jump all over about.....

Thanks.

What does the T-Shirt Say?

Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Would Operation Iraqi Freedom better known as Operation Iraqi Liberation- O.I.L. be POSSIBLE without 911?

Do you see the links with PNAC? - Project for a New American Century, the propoganda value of that T-SHIRT?

IT's the T-SHIRT sir. And the message it holds.

I am highlighting how the unelected (twice) Decider used the Iraq war for propoganda purposes.

And is still using it in photo-ops.

I hope we can see that.

A War NOT POSSIBLE without 911.

Bush used 911 for his wars of conquest. If we can't see that we need to open our eyes.

Pls see :

Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq (Paperback)

http://www.amazon.com/Weapons-Mass-Deception-Propaganda-Bushs/dp/1585422...

From Publishers Weekly
As government officials and observers battle over whether or not the Bush administration exaggerated intelligence reports of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to justify war, there should be a ready audience for this new book by the authors of Believe Us, We're Experts! Professional debunkers of media manipulation, Rampton and Stauber unmask the impact of "information warriors and perception managers" (as one PR consultant described himself) on Bush's attempt to turn public opinion in favor of war on Iraq. The authors deconstruct the PR campaign to promote the U.S. in the wake of September 11: the State Department's hiring of ad exec Charlotte Beers ("the queen of Madison Avenue") to direct the campaign; how PR execs and lobbyists helped construct the government's anti-Iraq message; the administration's alleged misinformation and distortion of facts and reliance on rumor to influence public opinion. Anyone skeptical of the reasons for the war against Iraq will find their suspicions enhanced here.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Download Description
"Weapons of Mass Deception reveals: How the Iraq war was sold to the American public through professional P.R. strategies. ""The First Casualty"": Lies that were told related to the Iraq war. Euphemisms and jargon related to the Iraq war, e.g. ""shock and awe,"" ""Operation Iraqi Freedom,"" ""axis of evil,"" ""coalition of the willing,"" etc. ""War as Opportunity"": How the war on terrorism and the war on Iraq have been used as marketing hooks to sell products and policies that have nothing to do with fighting terrorism. ""Brand America"": The efforts of Charlotte Beers and other U.S. propaganda campaigns designed to win hearts overseas. ""The Mass Media as Propaganda Vehicle"": How news coverage followed Washington's lead and language. The book includes a glossary - ""Propaganda: A User's Guide"" - and resources to help Americans sort through the deceptions to see the strings behind Washington's campaign to sell the Iraq war to the public."

Instead of asking me why I am using that picture, pls ask the P-RESIDENT why he IS USING that T-SHIRT?

Do you think the Iraq War is un-connected to 911?

Can't we see the overall big picture?

Pls read Project for a New American Century again.

Understand the 911 WARS and how propoganda has been used.

911 is central to ALL OF BUSH-CHENEY'S FOREIGN POLICIES.

That T-Shirt and the PROPOGANDA VALUE IT HAS SHOULD SPEAK VOLUMES.

The Nation Weeps as the President Lies;
http://www.opednews.com/wade_062905_bush_lies.htm

9/11 Used as a Justification to Invade & Occupy Iraq

Pls listen to Scott Ritter and what he has to say in this video below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6V_ANXIlAk

9/11 Truth: Bush Uses 9/11 To His Political Advantage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVqiCj09gKM

I hope we all can see the big picture.

I see the message on that T-Shirt loud and clear and how 911 has been used to dumb down an otherwise intelligent population.

The Iraq WAR and 911 are intimately interlinked.

So are all pictures used for propoganda purposes for advancing the Iraq War.

Which is a 911 War.

It is highly relevant.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Fine..... But my POINT still

Fine..... But my POINT still stands....

Find another picture......

Just above the picture.....
"Pls, Mr Gage remember when you are debating, this is what was done through manipulation and deceit.

Thanks to 911 and the lies that led to the 911 Wars."

People can say YOU are performing "manipulation and deceit" by saying "this is what was done" WITHOUT clarifying that Officer Schecterly (SP?) has nothing to do with 9/11.

This was, and IS, my point.

You are "indirectly" implying that people involved in Iraq are looking like this person, from the war........ If you don't see that and see how the other side will turn this, then you are not doing the movement any favors.

By the way.......

Before you go preaching to someone, you might want to know what this person knows about 9/11.....

It may be that I actually know more about 9/11 than you!

I don't know why you think YOU are the great messenger for 9/11, but you need to step back and think before you go off on someone for pointing out the OBVIOUS!!!!!

Misunderstanding.

You completely misunderstood what I was saying and i am sorry you allow yourself to jump to conclusions.

Pls look again at the T-shirt. My point again is the propoganda tool of Iraq being used.

Iraq is a 911 War. It may obvious to you but not all.

Nevertheless since that picture offends you so much, I apologize and will not use it again.

To quote you :

Just above the picture.....

"Pls, Mr Gage remember when you are debating, this is what was done through manipulation and deceit.

Thanks to 911 and the lies that led to the 911 Wars."

People can say YOU are performing "manipulation and deceit" by saying "this is what was done" WITHOUT clarifying that Officer Schecterly (SP?) has nothing to do with 9/11.

This was, and IS, my point.

You are "indirectly" implying that people involved in Iraq are looking like this person, from the war........ If you don't see that and see how the other side will turn this, then you are not doing the movement any favors. End quote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, let me clarify.

Pls refer to : http://www.officerjason.org/index.html for further information on

Jason was badly burned when his FORD CROWN VICTORIA POLICE INTERCEPTOR exploded in flames after being hit from behind by a taxi Cab. The collision happened while Jason was responding to a call. The Phoenix Fire Department was also in route to the same call and witnessed the collision. The Fire Department did a heroic job saving Officer Schechterle's life, freeing him from the burning vehicle. Jason received severe burns to his face, arms and upper body. He was transported to the Maricopa County Hospital Burn Unit, where he was treated until July 31, 2001 when he was finally transferred to the Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Unit.

Jason's story, however, cannot be told from just one point of view. There are so many sides to the story: His wife, the fire fighters, other police officers, the doctors, and Jason himself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding your accusation : Quote: "You are "indirectly" implying that people involved in Iraq are looking like this person, from the war........ If you don't see that and see how the other side will turn this, then you are not doing the movement any favors. End quote.

These are Iraqi Victims - thanks to the 911 Wars- A War refered to in the msg on the T-Shirt.

http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_page1.htm

I see some similarities, I also see the msg on the T-shirt.

I got the photo from a link regarding the Iraq War which I forget to copy down.

My focus is the msg on the T-shirt.

I apologize if you and others misunderstood my msg. I will leave the photo on my 1st comment availabe for the purpose of record BUT out of respect for your feelings will NOT use it again.

Pls. note I am not preaching or even trying to preach to you. If you miscontrue my message than I apologize.

Bush is using the Iraq War with its links to 911 in every photo op he can.

If you would just understand that you would not over react. I am not upset or angry over your posting which is obviously full of anger.

Be at peace. I don't presume to know more about 911 than your goodself.

I am sure you like the rest of us are trying your best to get the word out.

Instead of arguing with each other let's focus our energies on trying to get the word out.

No point have a critical arguement over a photo posting. If I had known that it would upset you so much, I would not have posted it.

Again I am sorry if it had upset you so much

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Again with the CONDESENDING

Again with the CONDESENDING comments?????

I NEVER said the photo "offended me".....

What I said was..... "Why are you using a picture of a Phoenix Police officer that was in a fire from being rear ended while in his police car as being part of 9/11????

Please do not include that picture in any more postings trying to relate that to 9/11.....

This type of thing is what the ney sayers will jump all over about.....

Thanks."

If your point is to make a point, then do that......

YOU are being "deceptive" and this is what turns people off from the movement.

"f you would just understand that you would not over react. I am not upset or angry over your posting which is obviously full of anger."

I never "over reacted" or got angry, YET!!!!

I simply pointed something out that could be used as a diversion, but you and your "I'm the leader and know more than you speach" has brought us to this point.....

By the way....... Thank you very much for proving my point about your preaching and arrogance about having all the answers...... I OBVIOUSLY knew about "Jason" and who he was, but you still had to link his information to prove your knowledge to be "superior" to mine. If I did not know about him, how can I mention his name and WHERE HE WORKED????

I lived in Arizona at the time of his accident and watched MANY news reports about him over several months......

Here's a word of advice, but I doubt you will listen....

When someone suggests something, try LISTENING! Don't try replying with a bunch of stuff that is regurgitated that MOST people HERE know about..... It's great that you want to spread the news, but try and realize that YOU are not the only one who has answers and knows what PNAC means......

Stick to the basics

This guy's going to try to derail the debate by presenting "explosives expert" testimony that is no doubt meant to discredit the WTC controlled demolition theory. One way you can get him on the facts is by asking him a direct question: Considering that the end products of a thermite, thermate, superthermite, or superthermate reaction are aluminum oxide, and iron, do you think, from a forensic's point of view, that using such a highly energetic reaction would be smart? In other words, if one wanted the explosive residue to be practically undetectable -- or hard to detect -- would it be smart on the part of the criminal bent on using such explosives to choose the thermite class of explosives/incendiaries over a type which is more conventional?

Be sure to ask why or why not?

More later . . .

Hear hear. He may try to snow you with arcane knowledge

about different types of explosives, fetching up to "See,
I'm an expert and I know."

You need to prepare a line to effectively show that the
explosives knowledge is irrelevant.

These parts of a recent Q & A should help . . .

About four or five months ago, I wrote to Gregory A. Butler, author of "Lost Towers: Inside the World Trade Center cleanup" and asked him a number of questions about his experience with 9/11. While I have yet to publish the entire Q &A here at 911Blogger (I will soon) I thought you might find these two questions and answers useful for your upcoming debate. More later . . .

* There is a widespread suspicion in certain circles that the collapse of WTC 7 was a domestic case of arson and insurance fraud. Do you feel there is any credibility to such claims? Why or why not?

There is no way that you can organize the demolition of a 40 story building in 10 hours - ESPECIALLY if the site is ON FIRE, surrounded by toxic dust and the entrances are filled with debris. It would take 200 blasters, laborers, electricians and operating engineers about a month to blow a building like that. Also, it is illegal to do explosive demolition in this city, and has been for over a century. All demo jobs here are done by hand, with torches, sledgehammers, sawzalls and crowbars (that's how they're demoing Deutsche Bank). Basically, Seven World Trade Center caught fire, burned for 10 hours, the steel failed due to the heat, and it fell.

* As the collapse of the twin towers was totally unprecedented and initially considered unusual, and as a precautionary measure in the interest of complete safety -- before first responders and other emergency personnel were allowed into the pit -- were bomb-sniffing dogs used to ensure that there were no possible incendiaries to be found in the WTC rubble pile? To the best of your knowledge, why or why not?

They used cadaver dogs to find survivors - and after Genelle Guzman was rescued on day three, to find dead bodies - but nobody used bomb sniffing dogs. it was chaos that first couple of days - nobody thought to check the rubble for bombs.

Some thoughts: Be prepared

Some thoughts:

Be prepared to face aggressive debating style. Try to take the initiative and lead the discussion to important points and topics.

Remember to mention Danny Jowenko's certainty about WTC 7.

Ask who'd need demo companies if fire and random damage were able to bring three skyscrapers to their foundations.

If he says the numerous pre-collapse reports of explosions had innocuous causes, point out that the role of the explosions in the collapses should have been carefully examined in any case.

Detonators

If Craig says explosives were impossible because someone
would see the miles of det cord, say radio control obviates
det cord. Radio-mediated computer control would also allow
the detonation sequence to be altered to suit the actual floors
where the plane struck, and could even be altered in real time
(using joystick control) to steer the rubble down into the building.

He will say that the risk of accidental premature detonation would
be too great in the signal-rich Manhattan environment. Not so.
Arming protocols involving complex messages precisely spaced
apart in time would activate the detonators only when it was time.

A complex pulse-coded individualized detonation signal (like MIDI)
would not respond to random radio glitches.

Finally, the use of extremely insensitive radio detectors that would
be deaf to ordinary radio noise, and the use of powerful signal
transmitters to trigger them would provide safety.

I would ask this so called "expert"

just how he believes that 95% of 100s of tons of reinforced concrete somehow managed to get pulverized into talcum powder fine dust from a simple collapse due to gravity.
Ask him to explain to you where the energy came from in order to accomplish that feat.
Then ask him how much energy is achieved during a controlled demolition and is not one of the main signs of a CD a pyroclastic flow of hot air/gas mixed with very fine dust because of the energy of the detonations.
In other words CD explains what is clearly visible to anyone sane in the videos of all 3 buildings while simple gravity collapse at near free fall speed due to fire is actually IMPOSSIBLE and is PROVEN to be by the irrefutable Laws of Physics.
Ask him to provide ANY video or evidence of ANYKIND of a high rise steel structure collapsing AT ALL because of fire let alone at free fall speed and then ask him to show the massive pyroclastic flow & tons of talcum powder fine dust coming from that mythical collapse.

Also ask just for shits and giggles how he thinks a multi ton steel beam managed to get BLOWN across West 57th St. some 400-600' away from a simple gravity collapse.?
How do over 1700 human bodies get BLOWN into tiny fragments collected in over 20,000 TEST TUBES from simple gravity collapse?

I refuse to believe that anyone in their right mind and educated at all in the field of demolition or engineering could possibly believe that those 3 buildings collapsed at near free fall speed because of a short duration low heat fire. So he is either lying or insane.

"So he is either lying or insane."

Yes you are right.

There are still a lot of people supporting the Official Myth and Lies despite the significant Scientific evidence that proves it a lie.

Too many strawman arguments, too many cheerleaders for Bush & Co. To many arm-chair critics.

The walls of lies are going to collapse.

To quote:

"Also ask just for shits and giggles how he thinks a multi ton steel beam managed to get BLOWN across West 57th St. some 400-600' away from a simple gravity collapse.?
How do over 1700 human bodies get BLOWN into tiny fragments collected in over 20,000 TEST TUBES from simple gravity collapse?

I refuse to believe that anyone in their right mind and educated at all in the field of demolition or engineering could possibly believe that those 3 buildings collapsed at near free fall speed because of a short duration low heat fire. So he is either lying or insane." End quote.

The Official Myth Supporters most likely are lying due to some level of complicity or fear.

We are going to change that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Don't forget about the sulfidation of the steel

I would be very interested to hear this guy's explanation of that one!

There is a debate

between various engineers on other sites regarding what type of charges would be needed.

Perhaps all that is needed to intiate the collapse is to destroy the core. This would explain the antenna dropping before the actual collapse and the deformation of the exterior (walls were pulled inward).

Also a good point to make is regarding evidence removal or tampering (which is criminal).

There are many complaints regarding the fact the government will not release structural drawings of the WTC and are listed as classified. Without these documents it is impossible to model the collapse with any degree of certainty.
Like the pentagon videos...if there is nothing to hide release the documents!!!! It is so simple!!

Show's about to start in 30 minutes

Teriffic job, Richard

You presented enough solid, logical evidence that anyone who is capable of thinking critically will be able to cut through the verbal clutter of this "explosives expert."
Very well done.

Anyone have an ARCHIVE of the show...

available for streaming / download ?

Many thanks and best wishes

I am sure that Richard did a great job

and I cant wait for it to be archived so I can listen to it, however I must say I don't think its a good idea for 9/11 Truth people to be affiliated, heard, on such bullshit radio shows as this "Richard Syrett" show.
Did you notice all the previous shows are nothing but lunatic fringe crap? A bunch of Creationist nut jobs, this is where people go to be marginalized.

Number of listeners?

Does anyone have an idea of how large the "listenership" of the show may have been?

Thanks Mekt_Ranzz...

Appreciated, will check it out

Best wishes