"..but for his own reason, Bill refuses to "go there". He has stated his opinion publicly so leave it at that. I don't quite understand why you are going after this one man."

Actually, he has attacked the controlled demoliton theory. I think you would agree there is more to 9/11 than that. He also has done so without any investigation into the details. Plane hit building. Building fall. Gee, thanks for the insight Bill (why are people watching you?)

" There are countless people who I respect who believe the official story and won't waver on that. It pisses them off every time I mention 9/11 so I don't waste my energy beating these guys over the head. "

I don't respect anyone who prefers ignorance, and is ok with a blatant, obvious government cover up.

As for beating them over the head, there are differerent approaches to try. I say, 'try them all.' We aren't just going "after Bill." It's his audience, in person, and on the air that is also the target of our efforts, of course.

The public commons have disappeared and become corporate mind controlled playgrounds of consumerism and distraction. Why should we play along?

"Time to move on...go after Hearst Publication's Popular Mechanics guys."

What does that mean? They aren't on a regular tv show (much less a live one where the disruption can make it to air). They are propagandists for the other side, and aren't going to suddenly flip.

" Better yet, use your energy to educate people in the streets who are receptive to knowing more."

We can do both.

"Right now all I hear people talking about is how annoying 9/11 truthers are becoming."

There's a lot of annoying truthers. I've been fighting with them for years. There is no intelligence test to join "the movement."

We do the best we can with the movement we've got. I try to give guidance and advice, but you can only lead them to water...

Aren't mass casualty terror attacks sanctioned by the unelected regime a tad more "annoying?"

" As it is effective in bringing attention to us, it seems like it will only bite us in the ass ultimately. People will turn off to this kind of agitation."

Or they'll get off their fat, lazy apathetic asses and go find out what the hell we're talking about. Sometimes the medicine tastes bitter. We live in a spoiled, sugar addicted society of dullards, entertainment addicts. They are conditioned to be as pathetic as I have described. Shocking them out of their sports/sex/video induced stupor isn't easy work.

"I am however in awe of your energy and determination. I appreciate that you are getting out there with such ferver...just try to be a bit more respectful while you are out there."

This I agree with. They shouldn't have shouted over the guest. They should have waited for a break in the flow and made their protest then. If they can calmly walk up to the stage and present their evidence to the front, it would be a better symbolic demonstration.

" Bill had a point about the word "audience". It was your choice to be part of the audience."

Now this is where it gets sticky. Audience is all the corporate masters of the airwaves, and of the public mind, will allow us to be. It is a direct protest against this reality that drives the protestors.

Why should Maher have an open mic to attack us broadcast to millions, while we have no similar recourse?

There is no "free speech" on the corporate owned media, whatsoever. Everything is vetted and controlled (except for a few shouts now and then). They are terrified of having a loose cannon like a "truther" saying things that the higher ups will have a melt down over. Those that run the organizations and set policy are complicit with the crimes.

These are supposed to be "public" airwaves, but we know the reality. They have given, in classic fascist fashion, the control of our airwaves to private entities to exploit and to control any way they see fit.

The public has been put to intellectual sleep as a result. Cranks like Maher give them the illusion they have some freedom -- in the media -- so when Maher is exposed as an obvious gatekeeper of information, a censor no different from any other corporate shill, this is a powerful revelation. It can wake people up.

" Whether you like it or not, it's Bill's show and you have done nothing but turn him farther away from the truth and any chance of a 9/11 debate on his show."

After 6 years of absolute censorship in the "land of the free" I don't really see how Bill was going to come around on his own?

He's a tool. Nothing more. He should get it just like the rest of them. His comments about "Paxil" were certainly not neutral. He went on the attack (in his ignorance/malevolence), and so he deserves a response. He deserves a non-stop continual response until we get fair treatment.