Found it !!

Daniel Hopsicker provides additional information. Search the site, there's alot there.
http://www.madcowprod.com/02212006.html

The Takfir Paradigm

How to explain this anomaly? Time Magazine reports that intelligence officials claim many al-Qaeda terrorists are “followers of an extremist Islamic ideology called Takfir wal Hijra (Anathema and Exile). That’s bad news: by blending into host communities, Takfiris attempt to avoid suspicion. A French official says they come across as ‘regular, fun-loving guys—but they’d slit your throat or bomb your building in a second.’” Another French official says that the goal of Takfir “is to blend into corrupt societies in order to plot attacks against them better. Members live together, will drink alcohol, eat during Ramadan, become smart dressers and ladies’ men to show just how integrated they are11.”

However, this depiction of al-Qaeda and Takfir wal Hijra is thoroughly inaccurate. Takfir wal Hijra was the title given to a radical Islamic movement known as the Society of Muslims. The latter was founded in Egypt by Muslim Brotherhood member Shukri Mustafa after his release from prison in 1971. The group disintegrated after Mustafa was arrested and executed by the Egyptian government, but some of its followers went on to join other radical groups such as al-Jihad and/or fled to North Africa. Rather than attempting to integrate into modern society to carry out attacks as intelligence officials now claim, Takfiri ideology advocated the very opposite: “As contemporary society was infidel, he argued, Takfir would set up its own alternative community that would work, study and pray together…. Takfir declared that not only the regime but the society itself was infidel and under excommunication. This entailed… a personal withdrawal from society.” Even Takfir’s rival radical Islamic group in Egypt, Jama’at al-Jihad, known as the Society of Struggle, espoused such a harsh perspective of Islamic practice that it advocated as Islam’s top priority “jihad against unbelievers—including ‘Muslims’ who did not observe the religion’s requirements properly”—let alone endorsing in any manner a violation of those requirements12.

So extreme is Takfir’s ideology, that it sees bin Laden as not sufficiently Islamic in his violent approach. The Sunday Times reported a month after 9/11 that Takfir “regards Osama bin Laden as an infidel who has sold out.” The group’s members “have embarked on killing sprees in mosques against fellow Muslims in the belief that a pure Islamic state can be built only if the corrupt elements of the last one are wiped out.” Takfir’s enmity toward al-Qaeda is based on the perception that Osama bin Laden is “excessively liberal.” In 1995, four Takfir members attempted to assassinate bin Laden at his home in Khartoum. Takfiris continue to be “angered” at bin Laden’s leadership of a “compromised jihad.” According to the Times, “Takfir denounces all but those who copy the behaviour of the prophet Muhammad as infidels and promises to kill them.” One senior Sudanese government source confirmed that Takfir “regard [bin Laden] as a sellout… the Takfir think that everything in contemporary Muslim society is corrupt and should be destroyed13.”

Djamel Beghal and Kamel Daoudi—alleged UK-based terrorists arrested in September 2001 for plotting a series of spectacular terrorist assaults on Europe—were both supposed to be members of Takfir wal Hijra. But according to one Algerian in London who knew Beghal, integrating into Western culture by engaging in various acts of debauchery in violation of Islamic tenets was the last thing this alleged Takfiri would ever do: “Believe me, you do not want these people in your country… they will kill anybody, including their own family, if they are caught smoking or drinking14.”

Thus, the new scenario being proposed by Western intelligence officials to explain the patently un-Islamic behavior of the 9/11 hijackers is largely incoherent. Despite claims to the contrary, Takfir wal Hijra is aggressively opposed to al-Qaeda and its strict ideology is fundamentally incommensurate with the prospect of permitting defiance of Islamic rules under any circumstances. Furthermore, al-Qaeda is in turn staunchly opposed to Takfir. Therefore, the anomaly of the 9/11 hijackers persists: They clearly did not possess the conduct of hardened Islamic fundamentalists connected to al-Qaeda. So, who were they?

http://reprehensor.gnn.tv/blogs/12624/Subverting_Terrorism_Nafeez_Ahmed_...

The 911myths site is a suspicious 'fake site' thrown up by 'anonymous' agents and so, John, I now find your motivations worth questioning. Do you think the 911 myths site is providing good research? If so, how long have you been studying this issue? Are you new here?

Don't blame 'we the people' (a Garcia move) and don't blame the whole country. I, for one, am tired of this bogus ploy.

The artilces by EW are excellent. She's really doing the job. Must be another professor.

Thanks Elizabeth!

were dupes, patsies, and/or wannabe gangsters & drug smugglers living the high-life while under the control of the U.S. gov't.

Three Saudis who were among the last of the Sept. 11 homicide hijackers to enter this country didn't visit a U.S. embassy or consulate to get their visas; they went to a travel agent, where they only submitted a short, two-page form and a photo. The program that made this possible, Visa Express, is still using travel agents in Saudi Arabia to fill this vital role in United States border security.

http://foi.missouri.edu/whistleblowing/visaexpress.html

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

They want to have it both ways.

Islamo fascists did it, they say. Well if they don't look like Islamo fascists, they must be in disguise. Right? What does it matter anyway? This is all a diversion

We know who did it, Don't waste time. Get them to jail before it gets impossible. 911 was an inside job.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfir_wal-Hijra

"Members of the group are radical Islamists who are not bound by the usual religious constraints. They adopt non-Islamic appearances such as shaving their beard and wearing a tie in order to blend into crowds and make themselves hard to detect even to other Muslims. They can drink alcohol and even eat pork to deceive their enemies. They believe that any means justify the end and, that killing other Muslims can be justified in their cause and that Western society is heathen and it is their duty to destroy it.[1]"

1. ^ "Al Qaeda's New Front" Frontline PBS News, 25 January 2005
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/front/etc/script.html

From Frontline's script:

NARRATOR: In August, 2001, Ahmed Rabei didn't collect his monthly food parcel. Immediately after the terrorist attack on 9/11, security services came looking for him. They were too late. The man with no passport had abandoned these quarters to travel for the next three years throughout Europe. It's now believed that he had taken on the manner and methods of the Takfir, violent Salafist extremists who came out of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Takfirs are not bound by the usual religious constraints. Rabei cut off his beard. He could now blend into the crowd. Takfirs, who have significantly influenced al Qaeda, believe that any means justify the end, that even other Muslims can be killed in the cause, that this society is heathen and they are the force to destroy it.

JEAN-LOUIS BRUGUIERE, Chief Anti-Terror Judge, France: We have a lot in Europe, many, many cells. Many groups belongs to Takfir or share the values of Takfir— very, very, very radical. And all the members are living look like undercover. They are no Islamic-looking, you know? They have no beards. They have just a tie. They drink alcoholic beverage. They can—

LOWELL BERGMAN: They drink—

JEAN-LOUIS BRUGUIERE: If necessary, yes, have a sandwich with pork inside is no problem. So the visible signs, it's quite impossible to discover. But they have, you know, two caps, two lives.

This addition, with its cite, first appeared in Wikipedia 02:38, 18 August 2006 and was entered by a user identified only by IP address 72.144.25.213. These are the only two Wikipeda entries from this IP address. The IP address resolves to BellSouth.net, possibly in Miami, FL.

http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr

Roland Jacquard, one of the world's leading scholars on Islamic terrorism, says flatly, "Atta was Takfiri."
http://voluntaryxchange.typepad.com/voluntaryxchange/2004/03/takfiri.html

However, a search of the Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) for "Takfir wal-Hijra" returns no results. A search for "Takfir" yeilds only three hits, two are dated 2006 and 2007, and one is not dated. None of the three mentions pork or liquor.
http://www.ict.org.il/index.php?sid=119&lang=en&act=search&str=takfiri

Interestingly, a search of the Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) for the term " Takfir wal-Hijra" returns the following:

"No Products Found!"

I hope that someone else catches the irony of this response.

Googling the phrases "Takfir wal Hijra" and "Takfir wal-Hijra" will return signifcantly different results, with the latter returning significantly more hits.

Lastly, A Google News search for ""Takfir wal-Hijra" "al Qaeda"" returns 65 news articles. Not a single one of the articles was published before September 11, 2001.

http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Takfir+wal-Hijra%22+%22al+Qaed...

For what it's worth.

--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

I've run into this "Takfir argument" on numerous occasions. It is just one more way this psy-op has been engineered to confuse and obfuscate reality.

I've spoken with about 15 commercial pilots (in person and online) and none of them think that even they could've flown the planes into the Towers and the Pentagon on their first, or even second or third, attempt. That said, we have insufficient evidence to conclude exactly who was on what plane doing what for what reason. This is just one out of thousands of questions that we need new investigations to answer.

Keep up the great work, John.

The truth shall set us free (speculation is a waste of time). Love is the only way forward.

"It remains quite within the realm of possibility that 'Al Qaeda' operatives, or people who believed that they were 'Al Qaeda' operatives, hijacked the aircraft and crashed them."

After 9/11, several professional pilots tried to hit virtual WTC towers in a flight simulator at the speeds observed on 9/11, with extremely poor results:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78

Yet people who had never flown a passenger jet before could have succeeded in that - live?

Why not set up a real scientific experiment with some professional pilots trying to hit virtual WTC towers in a flight simulator at the speed reported by the official sources, carefully documenting the experiment?

2) Pilots for 9/11 Truth have calculated that the official NTSB data for flight 175 requires that the plane flew from Trenton to NYC at a speed that was clearly above the maximum speed of a Boeing 767:

"Flight UA 175: An Incredible Journey"
http://tinyurl.com/ys56xp