imgstacke, is he going to single-handedly make any difference on any of those issues as a congressman? any real impact other than mostly talk and the occasional vote? look, i know people love this guy around here and i respect him as well but lets be realistic. hes not really sticking his neck out by taking positions that are popular to people like us. its great, dont get me wrong but what real risk is he taking by being on the right side of issues like the war, the FED and the Patriot act etc.? hes far from the only one, even that shill Mike Huckabee is talking about dismantling the IRS etc. taking a REAL stand on the 9/11 fraud is a very real risk, thats been proven. if Paul sticks with those positions you listed if/when he becomes preisdent, he would then be risking his neck. again, dont take this as some kind of Ron Paul attack, its not but he gets so much praise on this, a 9/11 board, but gets a pass on the issue of 9/11 from almost everyone here. will he still get that pass on this 9/11 board if/when he loses and is just a congressman again? because chances are he will remain silent on the most important issue of our time(and while its still possible to do something about it. time is running out, especially if we go to war with Iran, or god forbid get hit with another false flag.). THEN will it be ok to mix 9/11 truth with Ron Paul and try to get a real answer out of him on the "attacks" like we do with every other politician? let me be clear, i like what he IS doing but he can be doing MUCH more, especially on the 9/11 issue and he gets a pass on it here. again, this is a 9/11 board, lets keep that in perspective. im not out in the streets or at work etc. telling people NOT to vote for Ron Paul because hes a coward on 9/11 like every other politician(except you know who), im telling them TO vote for him because of the things you listed and because hes clearly the best candidate.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

what did she do for us though? she brought attention to THE issue when NOBODY was talking about it and asked Rumsfeld and Myers to their faces about the wargames, missing trillions and other things Ron Paul and everybody else refuses to ask about. she moved the ball forward on 9/11 in a huge way. Paul is as in the ring as McKinney once was, lets demand answers to the questions that remain about 9/11 from ALL politicians. i will not give Paul a pass on 9/11, i expect better than him telling Giuliani to read the Zelikow/Hamilton report. again, that doesnt mean im not pulling for Paul to win and promoting him to whoever will listen, i am, but nobody gets a pass and i stand by my statement that hes no McKinney. if he was he would have followed up on McKinney's questions about the wargames etc. Kucinich's moment of truth comes in September. i must admit ive never expected much and his lack of specifics has me worried but i"ll reserve judgement until Sept. and its funny because the excuse i hear so much about Paul's lack of realism on the subject of 9/11 is that it would kill his presidential bid. Kucinich doesnt seem to care, if he actually follows through with something concrete that would mean that Kucinich puts the truth and his principles above a presidential bid. again, i'll reserve judgement if/until i see something concrete in Sept. and i also must stress again that this is in the context of 9/11 for me, this is a 9/11 board and i respect Ron Paul more than i respect any other currently serving politician but he has failed us on the issue of 9/11 like the rest of them(at least Kucinich is paying lip service,hopefully more). he agrees with Noam Chomsky about blowback, thats great, so do i, but 9/11 clearly wasnt that.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA