Filling in Able Dangers blanks
orAntilogic Mon, 05/07/2007 - 10:23pm
The following picture was provided to INTELWIRE by means of the Department of Defense:
http://intelfiles.egoplex.com/abledanger.html
It's a better version of the picture released in the DoD Inspector General's report on Able Danger:
http://www.milnet.com/able-danger/Able-Danger-Output-From-DoD-IG-Report.gif
Using other pictures found on the internet, and this copy of Boesen's '93 bombing chart...
http://www.abledangerblog.com/lance.jpg
I filled in a few of the blanks in the Brooklyn Cell (red text), surprisingly easily:
They're simply the core group of '93 WTC Bombers from his earlier chart, sometimes the exact same picture. Anyone have any idea who's in the green square though?
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| ABLE-DANGERupdated.jpg | 992.6 KB |
- orAntilogic's blog
- Login to post comments
.
.
Well done
Thanks. Did you send this to Intelwire?
I did
And I said he didn't need the ? above Abouhalima's name because the exact picture used in the new chart was available on the net. I'm wondering if the green square is either Al Kaisi (aka Elqisi)or Abouhalima's brother. Neither would make sense, but I don't get why all the '93 bombers are tossed into the new Brooklyn Cell category to begin with, they'd mostly been apprehended and/or deported.
Al Quaeda, Al Smaeda
I am of the opinion that there is not now, and never was, an organized (or unorganized) "international" (or otherwise) terror/terrorist network by the name "al Quaeda", or any other name, as put forth in the British documentary film "The Power of Nightmares".
Parts 1, 2, and 3:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=881321004838285177
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4602171665328041876
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4729189253956590972
Supposedly, "al Quaeda" simply means "the database" in Farsi or Arabic, but I think it means "the bogyman" in "American".
----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent
http://www.chico911truth.org/
And Robin Cook
Robin Cook published this in The Guardian in 2005, shortly before his death:
Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1523838,00.html
So when we talk about Al Qaida, we're talking about an operation fully owned and operated by the CIA, possibly with Saudi financing.
Of course now any group of disaffected Muslims will appropriate the name, since it has become the mythical synonym of terror. In a sense there may now be "real Al Qaida" cells, that is, cells not controlled by the CIA, all over the world.
(I don't know what to make of Peter Lance, but he is certainly upholding the official myth. I cannot bring myself to read any of his books fully, because of how he refuses to see the 800-pound gorilla in the room.)
yeah right - look at all the scary muzzle-'ims!
yep, al Qaeda is a database. it includes names and addresses and phone numbers, pant size, a picture, and the particular arab mercenary's taste in drugs, booze, and hooker. problem is it's not kept up to date and sometimes info doesn't get in like "left mujahideen for career as pilot in Morroco. do not use as patsy" it is by now transparently obvious that as the myth evaporates people are using the flimsiest "proof" to support the existence of this replacement for "evil commies". no doubt there could someday be a "real" al Qaeda, but that depends on the efforts of folks like the Mossad agents who went to Gaza to recruit members for them, and lord knows who else. think about it this way--we know the Jewish Defense League is an actual terrorist group that has occasionally pulled off or plotted attacks on anti-Zionists. How easy would it be for someone who was so inclined to pose as a radical zionist and offer some goon some money and explosives to attack a mosque, and then take credit for it on behalf of JDL? And then imagine what a media system with a strong anti-Zionist bias could do with THAT story? It's frightening in fact, and when people are not highly critical of the attempts of Peter Lance and others to make a living by pushing such a sick myth it really just invites trouble.
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
i hear you man, i have to
i hear you man, i have to remind people about Lance all the time. too many people seem too willing to buy what hes selling, even in a movement as skeptical as this one. and i know you dont like Alex Jones but he did a pretty good job of wiping the floor with Lance on some debate a couple of years back. havent seen Lance try to spar with any REAL 9/11 debaters since then.
i actually bought one of his
i actually bought one of his books on a whim based on the cover alone. it was called Cover-Up and was about 9/11 and i was in a hurry so i bought it(big mistake). thats what i get for assuming that a book called Cover-Up would genuinely try to expose a cover-up. dont waste your time, i read the entire thing and it was hardly worth it. Lance is a former ABC News shill anyway.
does anybody know what
does anybody know what Weldon is up to now? im not a big fan of the guy and feel that his motives are clearly less than pure but regardless it was nice that someone in congress was looking into at least one aspect of 9/11. it may just be a patsy ring but still worth looking into obviously. Weldon needs to have a chat with McKinney though.......
Government Bush did it!
Al Quada is a false path! Period!
Drummerboy
**********************************************************
You can't hide a lie for long. Truth shall come out.
The best document about the
The best document about the 93 bombing so far still this:
http://www.textfiles.com/conspiracy/wtcbomb1.txt