Barrett to Confront Steve Nass, Announce Morocco "Hijacker" Search
fhb Thu, 05/03/2007 - 9:20am
For Immediate Release: Barrett to Confront Steve Nass, Announce Morocco "Hijacker" Search
10:30 a.m. today, Thursday 5/3, outside Rm. 12 West, State Capitol
Kevin Barrett has never met his would-be nemesis, Steve Nass, in person. But that may change this morning outside Nass's office, Rm. 12, at the Wisconsin State Capitol.
Barrett will:
- Make an important announcement regarding his employment relations with the University of Wisconsin.
- Challenge Nass to debate the facts of 9/11, or to produce a UW teacher or other qualified debater willing to defend the 9/11 Commission Report in a free and fair debate.
- Offer Nass an absolutely free copy of David Griffin's brand-new Debunking 9/11 Debunking (a $20 value) which utterly demolishes every significant public attempt yet made to argue that 9/11 was not an inside job.
- Show his Fugitive Recovery Agent badge and ID and announce his imminent departure for Morocco in search of Waleed al-Shehri, the still-living man who the 9/11 Commission says stabbed an "unarmed flight attendant" shortly before Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center: http://mujca.com/waleed.htm
In the event that Nass makes yet another cowardly attempt to evade Barrett's debate challenge, Barrett will attempt, within the bounds of the law, to enter Nass's office and remain there until either Nass shows up and hears the debate challenge in person, or Barrett has to leave for Morocco, whichever comes first.
- fhb's blog
- Login to post comments
Thank you Kevin!
Kevin you are a great iconoclast! Quality activism! True info warrior! We support you and are working hard in our own ways so you are not alone in your endeavors. People all over the world are making sacrifices so the people that have been sacrificed don't have to.
DIGG ME
http://www.digg.com/world_news/There_Should_Be_A_Digg_Riot_Everyday_2
Go for it, Kevin
I think Barrett has hit the right note on this.
It's both funny and deep.
Please keep us informed of developments.
He should film the whole thing!
Footage of his adventures abroad would make for a great documentary!
You have to
give Kevin Barret a lot of credit. He really believes in his cause & is creative & willingfull enough to pursue it.
Classic...
For the benefit of Mr. Kite,
There will be a show tonight on trampoline...
go Kevin!
Is this for real or satire?
Is this for real or satire?
I just hope...
... that nothing bad will happen to Barrett during his journey. He should be extremely careful.
Love this guy
I hope someone films this, I'll bet Nassty doesn't show.
Kevin Barrett
I personally think it would have been much better if Mr. Barrett had not openly announced his intentions of going to overseas to capture this so called fugitive. Several reasons, it would have been jaw dropping for all to see Mr. Barrett interview on videotape or better yet, bring him to the states and have him as a surprise guest of some unsuspecting MSM network show. Also, I would think if this individual is alive his life has to be in serious danger now. The NWO doesn't want this guy showing up alive.
Vilification...again?
Hi, just want to encourage folks to be a little more thoughtful in their presentation of events. The way 911Truthers seem to relish in degrading insults detracts from the situation completely.
Why call Nash a coward? Why insult others? Expressing anger, disagreement, frustration...that's one thing, but insulting is attacking someone and is a waste of our time. Solutions happen through cooperation and acceptance of differences.
Taking the time to thoughtfully report a situation and respectfully express disagreement would up the quality and power of this most excellent website , and would probably take 911 Truth out of it's rut.
Peace,
Matt
In general
I agree with what you say. But not in this case. Nass is and has been a total coward, pushing all of the usual ignorant and patriotic buttons about Barrett and 9/11 Truth.
He is a small-time Wisconsin politician who is willing to hurl invective but never backs up his claims.
I lived in Wisconsin some years ago and what Barrett is doing is classic Wisconsin politics, in many ways.
If Nass is willing to say the things he does but not debate the issue in public like a gentleman, then he is not a gentleman and deserves to be called a "coward."
Also, Barrett has been very generous and asked Nass to get someone else to debate in his stead, if he so prefers.
Go for it, Kevin. This is right on.
The general rule of "good manners" can and should be broken in some cases. This is one of them as was Luke's confrontation with Brzezinski (sp?) a few days ago. These are important acts and both Luke and Barrett are doing/did the right thing, IMHO.
In addition
to what I said above, I think there are a couple of other situations where "good manners" are no longer called for (or are optional).
One of them is the "campaign speech" get-together situation where some politician (Kerry did just this recently) goes to some school or someone's home. In that place they are asked about their views on 9/11 Truth...
IF they respond that "this is the first time I ever heard anything like that," I think it is more than appropriate to respond in a very direct tone and pointedly demand to know how come they still don't know there is a controversy surrounding 9/11 after 5 1/2 years?
Another one occurs (Obama did this recently) when the candidate says something like "I have heard that what you say is not credible..." Same sort of response is more than appropriate. "After 5 1/2 years, you 'have heard that what I say is not credible?' Why have YOU not looked at the evidence yourself?"
Another one is "Please send me your evidence, I will be happy to look at it..." What? You STILL have not looked at the evidence yourself?
And there are others like these.
We can't keep letting them get away with this sort of waffling answer. Good manners have their limits. If every time you ask, they say, "Please go sit in the hall for a while..." When are they ever going to answer?
9/11 Truth is a mainstream issue. It's 5 1/2 years. There is no way any candidate should be allowed to get away with evasive answers anymore. Let's make them give real answers.
How do you understand the evidence, Sir or Madam? Zat so? Then, please explain to me how you think the Towers turned to dust at free-fall speed.
Clurely....
Vilification? Go to the previous post.
"War and the Police State: Complicity of the American People
donna j. thorne | globalresearch.ca | opinion"
I'm sick of even bothering to argue with non-truthers. I can forgive naivete, but I can't forgive intentional ridicule and debasement of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
JamesB, I see yer' in these parts: to you "Real Americans", read between the lines: I'm 100% sure that 9/11 was a government operation supported by the global corporate/capitalist structure. I'm certain enough to be willing to bet my life on it, if the situation presents itself. You traitors to humanity: I'm sick of you polluting, raping this world, both the planet and its people, for your selfish, material, egotistical desires. I've lost patience, even with previous "friends" who are too cowardly to deal with the Truth issue. It is at the point that I delete dozens from my e-mail list.
Truthers of the world: maintain! Screw those complicit with the fascists. I feel like we're in Germany, 1938, and we can't say that all the non-Truthers(German civilians of the day)are evil as individuals,but together, by not resisting the corporate media/government (der Fuhrer of the day) they allow it to continue advancing its corrupt plans. To any Jews out there who put down the Movement as "anti-Semitic": The fact that Israel and many American Jews are so involved in the 9/11 event and coverup is appalling.
Again, debunkers/non-Truthers/those complicit in the crime by inaction: go to the previous posting by "global research": we are at war, both at home and abroad. Take your position, I've taken mine, and let's watch history unfold.
Vilification?
Barrett has called for every mainstream journalist to be hung for treason and said Senator McCain is guilty of treason and crimes against humanity. Calling someone a coward is probably the nicest thing he has ever said about someone he doesn't like.
JamesB:
Please, go here:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=THO20070421&art...
Read it twice. I repeat myself: "I am 100% sure that 9/11...blah blah. " Hang the journalists? No, but I can see some major CEOs of the mainstream media waiting for "Saddam Justice". Yes, I despise them more for being traitors to humanity than just to the 3,000 Joe-blows that got blown to smithereens, and the dead of Iraq, both natives and Americans. So much blood on their hands, and I imagine a good number of them can be found dining right now at the top restaurants in Manhattan. Probably joking around with Hillary and Tom McCain. And Larry Silverstein, the sick f#$@!
Guilty for crimes against humanity? Think about it.
(although I must at this point consider the possibility that we do not all share certain values: you debunkers and Truth attackers might not see any problem in allowing thousands of people to be blown up, others to slowly lose the ability to breath-so that you could make $$$. I guess I am less "American" than you! Please forgive me for my non-materialistic values.I mean, I don't even have a car. That makes me an "enemy combatant" to you REAL Americans.)
Still confused... Another question:
If the guy in Morroco is not the same guy pictured on the current FBI list, and those pictures (FBI and BBC) were circling all around the world in thousands of news outlets then...
Why would the Morrocan claim that he is in fact the same guy that the FBI is claiming to be the terrorist?
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.
Exactly Runner701...
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.
There was also Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects who lost his passport whilst studying in Denver...
Source for both : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
I am explaining this for the last time
Now pay attention, he does not "claim that he is in fact the same guy the that the FBI is claiming to be a terrorist".
He saw his photo on CNN once, over 5 years ago. CNN ran it by mistake, and even gave him the wrong name.
http://www.911myths.com/html/waleed_al-shehri_still_alive.html
Whether he attended a flight school or not is irrelevent, because the Waleed Al Shehri identified by the FBI WAS NOT A PILOT. The Moroccan Al Shehri left the US 7 months before the Al Shehri identified by the FBI ever got there.
For the "last time" uh? Well, we'll see...
BTW--I was the first to give you a -1 --ha, ha, ha!
Ahem. So, what are the odds the FBI misidentified MULTIPLE PEOPLE in the same case, Jimbo?
And how did you find out the fake Nico and the fake "Pat" were from the same place--without actually working with Nico himself?
And do you ever wonder which blog, after 911bloglines, gets the most total results when you Google "killtwoofers"? Do you ever wonder? (hint: you hit your stride around page 3--remember to include ALL results)
And I'm still working on that lovely CROSSBALL--never fear--you are not forgotten, love...
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.
Still confused ...?
How do you know CNN ran the wrong picture? ...
And if it was wrong, how did they randomly get the photograph of this specific Morrocan?
the us government is to be acountable to us
not so much mr. Barrett.
Why not ask the FBI to prove who the hijackers were? According to the 9/11 commission report the hijackers used more than 300 fake names. According to the report, the hijackers were identified by a suspect held in secret custody, tortured, and reported dead by the Asian Times.
Not only that, but this testimony has been kept secret. The commissioners were given a summary that the public is not allowed to review. Hmm. And you ask Mr. Barrett for the truth?
Who are you and why do you hate Americans so much that you atttack efforts to discover what the secret police of this country hide from their bosses, the American people?
I demand an answer James B
Justice deferred is justice denied-MLK
"I demand an answer James B"
Good luck with that. That man has a yellow streak longer than a herd of diarrhoetic camels...
BTW--I didn't know about the alledged 300fake names. If true--doubtful--how do you do that without being an intelligence agent? I don't think the average idenitiy thief gets past 50, though I could be wrong.
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.
FWIW, I don't think 1 guy had all 300
My read on that was that the 19 had 300 between them. I've not paid attention to the "hijackers" though and am only going from this report and whatever hazy fuzz was floating around my mind already re: the Incredible Flying Oswalds.
Do I sound skeptical? LOL.
Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"
Lest we forget the Bukhari Brothers.
"Police and law enforcement sources said the two brothers suspected in the Boston hijackings were Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Abbas Bukhari, who up until recent days had lived in Vero Beach, Florida. Both of their homes have been searched, the sources said.
The two rented a car, a silver-blue Nissan Altima, from an Alamo car rental at Boston's Logan Airport and drove to an airport in Portland, Maine, where they got on US Airways Flight 5930 at 6 a.m. Tuesday headed back to Boston, the sources said.
Investigators are analyzing videotapes at the car rental facility and at the Maine airport.
Before CNN learned the identities of the two brothers, Portland Police Chief Mike Chitwood said, "I can tell you those two individuals did get on a plane and fly to Boston early yesterday morning ... I can tell you that they are the focus of a federal investigation."
Law enforcement sources said investigators searched for documents pertaining to the Bukharis and other students at Flight Safety International, a Vero Beach aviation school."
http://web.archive.org/web/20030409212628/http://english.peopledaily.com...
------------------------------------
The FBI had to stop using the Bukharis after one of them turned up alive.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/america.attack/
Not the most efficient travel plans
Hmmm, you're in Boston, planning on hijacking a flight out of Boston--so what do you do? Why, drive up to Portland so that you can catch a flight back to the airport in the city you just drove from, of course! No? That doesn't make sense? Well maybe they just had a sudden craving for lobster (or are 'fundamentalist' Muslims not allowed to eat shellfish?).
The most plausible explanation is the false-flag one. It was important for the official story that the alleged hijackers have items (flight manuals, wills, religious texts) which got left behind at Logan airport; and how they came to be separated from their personal items would be harder to account for had they boarded the plane straight out of Boston--more plausible if it could be claimed that they had just arrived from a connecting flight, their baggage didn't make the switch from the Portland flight to the Boston one in time, yadda yadda yadda.
Interesting discussion here:
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_748.shtml