It was all a coincidence – Using occam’s razor to prove 9/11 truth.

There are really only two theories regarding the events on 9/11. That there was no complicity outside of al queda or there was complicity outside of al queda. Members of the 9/11 truth community ascribe that there was complicity outside of al queda. There was intelligence agency involvement. How much of that involvement belonged to Pakistani ISI, the CIA, Mossad, Saudi intelligence, British intelligence, the FBI, we can go round and round about (and we do). But the bottom line is that there was some intelligence agency involvement. The second area of complicity is U.S. government officials being involved in some fashion. Whether that was in blocking other officials from stopping the attacks, helping to coordinate the attacks, aiding in setting up the conditions which allowed the attack to be successful (i.e. war games and drills) or other scenarios is something that can’t be concretely determined at this time without further investigation.

I believe that most people intuitively understood there must have been some state intelligence agency involved, which is why the administration was so successful, (and still successful with over a quarter of the people in the U.S.) in tying Iraq to the 9/11 attacks. The American people understood that an operation of this scope took some kind of intelligence agency involvement. Although facts point to the agencies mentioned above, when all the administration offered was Iraqi intelligence (something Dick Cheney endlessly proclaimed) many Americans swallowed it hook line and sinker because they knew someone else was involved besides the ragtag group we attacked in the mountains of Afghanistan.

If you ascribe to the theory there was no complicity in the 9/11 attacks outside of al queda that led to their success, you are left with a mountain of coincidences.

It was a coincidence that Norman Mineta testified to the 9/11 commission of VP Dick Cheney’s conversation with a staffer in the East Wing bunker that morning describing an order that ‘still stands’ as the plane approached the pentagon, yet VP Dick Cheney who spoke behind closed doors to members of the 9/11 commission contends he wasn’t even there.

It was a coincidence that policy makers such as the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) were calling in 2000 for foreign policy changes that would never be undertaken without a new ‘Pearl Harbor’ event, and then once they were in power in 2001 that event occurs.

It was a coincidence that members of the FBI, CIA, and Israeli intelligence were set up near several of the 9/11 hijackers.

It was a coincidence that $100,000 was ordered to be sent to the lead hijacker, Atta, by the head of Pakistani’s intelligence service, ISI, in the weeks leading up to the attack. (and this same individual was meeting with top ranking U.S. officials during the week of the attack).
It was a coincidence that World Trade Center 7, a steel-framed skyscraper, fell due to only fire and damage from the debris of the towers, in the exact same manner of global collapse, near free fall time, and symmetrical as it would have been destroyed in a controlled demolition.

It was a coincidence that Al Queda selected to attack the same day that there were numerous drills involving the USAF, drills that even involved hijacking, thus giving al queda the exact conditions necessary for the method of attack. Some drills caused fighters to be deployed that day to Canada, some off the eastern seaboard, and then other drills involved hijacking which helped lead to confusion between operators at NORAD and NEADS and FAA.

It was a coincidence that just the day before Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced $2.3 trillion that couldn’t be accounted for from the Defense Department over a number of years.

It was a coincidence that the administration didn’t press to capture Osama bin Laden in winter of 2001, and allowed al queda leadership to escape from Tora Bora by a caravan of aircraft.

It was a coincidence that the secret service failed to move Bush that morning immediately as it because clear that the U.S. was under attack, even though they would have no idea if al queda had targeted the president, whose announced location had been known.

It was a coincidence that in the months prior to 9/11, the U.S. government had already warned other nations that it may take on the Taliban in 2001 because of disputes over a proposed oil/gas pipeline.

It was a coincidence that people seen ‘dancing’ and recording the event were part of an admitted Israeli spy ring.

It was a coincidence that stock options were put on American and United Airlines in the days before the attack which benefited the still unknown individuals financially.

It was a coincidence that several of the supposed planners of the attacks were intelligence assets in the past, including Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Ali Mohammed.

It was a coincidence that Hani Hanjour, who had trouble piloting a Cessna 172, was able to pull off and incredible maneuver in making a direct hit on the face of the 5 story high Pentagon in an airliner.

It was a coincidence that Atta’s passport survived the 9/11 attacks in pristine condition, floating down to the ground on 9/11.

It was a coincidence that Atta left information in a rental car at the airport, allowing the case to be ‘solved’ on the morning of 9/11.
It was a coincidence that although most major terrorist acts involved an admission of responsibility by the responsible group, there was only a denial sent out by Osama bin Laden.

It was a coincidence that in the following weeks there were anthrax attacks aimed at members of the U.S. government, which are still unsolved to this day but are believed to come from weaponized anthrax stores within the U.S.

I understand that many people hold to the contention that the suspicious nature of Bush administration and other government officials following 9/11 was just due to trying to cover up incompetence and ideologues abusing the situation granted to them after the events of 9/11. But if it were true that there was no complicity, all of these instances would have to be coincidences. Or you must conclude that the other theory is correct, that there was complicity outside of ‘al queda’. In that hypothesis none of these instances have to be unaccounted for coincidences. Using occam’s razor, you should be able to come to the correct conclusion.