New Video Of WTC Bomb Witnesses On 9/11.
Badmachine Fri, 03/02/2007 - 8:01am
The opening of this compilation of eyewitness and media reports of explosive devices at the World Trade Center on 9/11, begins with 3 rarely seen interviews.
The evidence of explosive devices at the World Trade Center on 9/11 is nearly overwhelming and the media and government who continue to refuse to address this evidence now resemble Iraq's 'Baghdad Bob' who on the behalf of Saddam Hussein, insisted to the world's assembled media in 2003 that U.S. forces were being routed even as sounds of their swift takeover of Baghdad could be heard in the background.
Why does the government and media refuse to address an aspect of 9/11 (explosive devices at WTC.) that is now forever linked to the event?
What do they fear?
- Badmachine's blog
- Login to post comments
Here's what I wrote to the BBC
To Whom It May Concern at the BBC,
I have a suggestion, it's not too outside the perameters of consideration. I hope it will be considered by those who may be able to make constructive use of it, so please forward this to those parties if this suggestion passes the judgement of those initially reading this email.
If BBC is truely not a puppet media machine and is capable since 2004 of again produceing and airing documentaries such as "The Power of Nightmares", it can surely prove it by using this suggestion. I also think my suggestion would add higher interest value to all viewers.
Here's my suggestion: Take a choice selection of people from the 911 Blogger and the British site http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/ and use them as investigative journalists along with another crew and go after certain issues brought up by the 911 truth movement. You would then have a very unbalanced and much more unchallengeable platform in order to do some serious reporting on the findings. This is novel and in view of the new media outlets we have today, such as those mentioned above, incorporating them into the fold will add the credibility and interest necessary to bring to light the truth on this very serious subject.
By the way, my husband who has always been on the fence with the 991 controversy has been very much changed in his perspective by viewing this excellent short clip showing explosions and relatively little known reports by the FBI. Here is the video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5182535448932065917&hl=en .
Yours truly,
Karen Ellis
Nice Letter
But how do you expect to be taken seriously if you do not use a spell checker. Proof reading would be good as well. 991 for 911. Yikes!
Gary
911truthnc.org
“it is possible to fool all the people all the time—when government and press cooperate.” George Seldes - "legendary investigative reporter"
Thank you for this video --
Thank you for this video -- how could all of those people (eyewitnesses, firefighters, news reporters) all have said essentially the same thing without it being true? The only explanation is that these other explosions were part of the systemic destruction of the WTC buildings -- and yet this is totally ignored by the official conspiracy theory. It's beyond absurd, really. Keep the faith. Thanks for continuing the fight for truth.
Where is this from?
Has it ever been established where the INS officer and firemen were when that loud explosion went off while they were on the payphone?