I had a similar thread earlier this day:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6513

Here are more points that came to my mind:
******************************************************************************************
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html#c861586

· 119.
· At 09:44 PM on 27 Feb 2007,
· Jason wrote:
I'm confused...what is the conspiracy? What are the implications of reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did? Who cares I was living in NYC at the time and it was widely reported that other building that were part of the WTC were collapsing or would collapse eventually. So they jumped the gun? What are the implications everyone is getting at here????
******************************************************************************************

So, spot on.

I have heard several times now the spin that the BBC probably mixed up these other reports that “other buildings might collapse” with “Building 7 has collapsed”. Besides all doubts that the BBC could made such an unbelievable error and that other news-outlets were running similar news:

There are more points, that points to the direction that this may be indeed more damning proof of foreknowlegde.

-So, who told us the whole day that some buildings might collapse due to fire and damage?
-Especially concerning WTC7?
-Keep in mind the far more damaged other buildings of the complex, which where partly destroyed, but did not collapse…
-When not a single steel-framed building has ever collapsed due to fire before 911?
-without semantics about the meaning of collapsed, not partially collapse or other stuff, exactly what did happen to WTC7, collapsed in its own footprint, totally?
-What about the other news, aka no victims, the “47 storey”, and even the explanation that it was no new attack, but a result of the fires and the fallen debris from WTC1 and 2? How did they now, if they “just mixed that up”?

Only low probabilty, methinks.

Then we have the Harley Guy and Jerome Hauer who were feeding myths immediately to the public, as we know now.

Maybe the reporting about other, possible collaspes was part of this strategy, too? How convenient would it appear if WTC7 just collapsed 8 hours after the attack and the debris fallen on it without these reportings? Wouldn’t that lead to more questions how this could be possible?
Remember, they could suppress WTC7 from public knowledge until now. I’m sure even today most people are not aware, hadn’t one poll found out that 40% never heard of it?

And please keep in mind the foreknowledge of the Twin Towers collapse also.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_giuliani.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fematape.html

“I went into No. 7, activated OEM, placed calls to EMS Citywide, RCC, to tell them we were there and we were activated.
Maybe five, ten minutes, not even ten minutes later, a rep from OEM came into the main room and said we need to evacuate the building; there's a third plane inbound. That was the only thing I really heard because I said, Abdo, we've got to go, and we made it down to the lobby of the building, street level, met up
with Chief Peruggia in the lobby of the building. He said that there was no third plane but we needed to re-establish OEM right there so we can coordinate what was going on. He had already been to the command post, so he told us, and he was trying to release people back to be operational. He was looking for the Fire guy to go back in. He was there with Captain Yakimovich. In OEM with Captain Nahmod and I was Chief Maggio, who is now retired, and another firefighter from the 1st Division. We were really trying to establish OEM and a treatment sector in the lobby of the building because there were people coming around us.
Again, times are a little fuzzy initially for me. A few minutes later, John came to me and said you need to go find Chief Ganci and relay the following message:
that the buildings have been compromised, we need to evacuate, they're going to collapse.”
Testimony R. Zarillo

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/9110161.PDF

German yellow press Bild Zeitung maintained
http://www.bild.t-online.de/BTO/news/aktuell/2006/09/07/wtc-serie-einsturz/wtc-serie-einsturz.html

that the warning came from an unidentified civil engineer from the civil authority. But why to hell was he unidentified? He is most likely a hero, saved dozens if not hundreds of lifes...
Wouldn’t he come forward with this? No? Maybe the warner did belong to the perps?
A warning of a collapse, right before it begins? How did he know the buildings were compromised to collapse? When all the firefighters on scene know not?

Keep diggin'

(sorry if this is a dupe, got problems with this site)