Tarpley's "World Crisis Radio" to feature Meria Heller today - 12/2/2006
Webster Tarpley will interview Meria Heller today during his radio program, "World Crisis Radio". As always, a unique roundup of the global political scene, and a hefty dose of discussion of all things 9/11 will take place on Tarpley's weekly show.
RBN broadcasts 3 radio programs in a row on Saturdays that feature 9/11 discussion:
Jason Bermas of Loose Change fame has a show called, appropriately, "Louder Than Words Radio" from 2-4pm; followed by Tarpley's "World Crisis Radio" from 4-6pm; followed by the recently re-named "Truth Jihad Radio" from 6-8pm hosted by Kevin Barrett. (Barrett took over the time slot formerly occupied by James Fetzer on Saturdays.)
All times Central.
Streaming options here:
http://rbnlive.com/listen.html
Archived shows here:
http://rbnlive.com/archiveindex.html
- Login to post comments
Just wanted to comment that
Just wanted to comment that 9-11 "truther" Dr. Kevin Barret has shows on both RBNlive.com as well as the new "Dynamic Duo" show on GCNlive.com. Dr. Barret hosts that GCN show Mondays and Fridays.
Also, the www.ST911.org site has a nice new feature for those, like me, who want to make sure and read every new article posted there. At the far right of the navigation bar at the top of the home page is a tab "New Postings" and clicking that will take you to a new section that gives names and links of the newly posted articles for that site over the last one of two days.
I think Dr. James Fetzer is trying very hard to wisely guy the scholars for 9-11 society and I personally appreciate his lively radio shows and speaking engagements. He has exposed the logical flaws in several phony assaults on the 9-11 truth effort.
Fetzer is also on GCN
Jim Fetzer is the other half of the dynamic duo, (which on DAILY 4 to 6 eastern).
The archives for the first two weeks of the show are here
http://www.gcnlive.com/sampldyduo.htm
Fetzer does Tu,Wed, Thur, while Barrett does Mon and Fridays.
The first week (21, 22, 23) Fetzer covered the JFK asassination.
On the 28th, Fetzer did an excellent job covering the reasons to doubt the official conspiracy theory.
On the 29th, he interviewed Judy Wood. Her work is here:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/
This interview was less passionate than the one he did on RBN Nov 18th,
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Fetzer06.html
and mostly covered the photographic evidence of the events of 911 - which clearly show the results of a pulverization of the twin towers.
They discussed Wood's belief that protection of the concrete bathtub was critical to the WTC destruction.
Wood points out that if the the bathtub had been compromised that Hudson River water would have flowed into the bathtub which would then easily flow into (and FLOOD) the NYC subway system. (!)
Yes, they did allude to directed energy weapons as a POSSIBLE source.
Fetzer has clearly reacted to the complaints that he was less than critical of Wood's initial assertions in the RBN interview.
In the GCN interview he tried to take a more scientific review of the evidence.
I'm not sure what to think about directed energy weapons and it sure does SOUND nutty, but it's really hard to explain the many toasted vehicles, the utter pulverization of the towers, the clean, circular holes in Buildings 5 and 6 and in the adjacent street. Wood implies that the energy for the empty, circular holes came from above.....
We have to agree that most of us don't know anything about top secret weapons before they are made public.
On the 29th Fetzer interviewed structural engineer Charles Pegelow. Fetzer explained that he believes that a "multiple sources" of energy were probably responsible for the destruction of the WTC buildings (1,2,3,4,5,6 AND 7).
He speculates that a combination of RDX, thermite, AND a high tech energy beam destroyed the building.
He even throws out the theory that HAARP weapons could have played a role...
Note that ONLY buildings that were labeled WTC were destroyed that day.
Isn't that odd....
-----------------
All aspects of the truth are consistent
I agree Fetzer has been a very good spokesman
(Shame on his detractors!)
On CNN, Doubletree Hotel Video aired this morning.
Has anyone else seen this?
Michael Horrocks
Michael Horrocks was claimed to be the first officer aboard United Airlines Flight 175. I find it very amazing that his family in their time of grief created a web site 2 days later!!!
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
http://www.michaelroberthorrocks.com/
Domain Name: MICHAELROBERTHORROCKS.COM
Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.register.com
Referral URL: http://www.register.com
Name Server: NS2.CNCHOST.COM
Name Server: NS1.CNCHOST.COM
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Updated Date: 01-dec-2006
Creation Date: 13-sep-2001
Expiration Date: 13-sep-2009
http://www.betterwhois.com/
Your logical deductions
Your logical deductions suck...
We're all getting sicker
Les is spot on this time. We are A L L getting sick, some are even sicker, and some have already died...
It's on live.
Horrors!
Dr. Kevin Barrett mentioned on his program tonight he wasn't closed-minded on the dreaded SPACE BEAM theory!
Which 911bloggers will have an aneurysm?
Which will simply shrug and add him to their Enemies List?
Stay tuned for the continuing soap opera!
took some digging
to figure out what all this rancor is about - again one more contested-as-wacko analysis of the controlled demolition -- please give up fighting over this -- let whoever will study whatever on this issue pursue whatever lines they are inclined to follow -- this is not the central issue on which to build the 911Turth case -- listen to Tarpley's 09/02 broadcast -- return again and again to ANGEL IS NEXT & THE CALL TO PUTIN -- the heart of the 911 coup -- all fully documented in the main stream media, and never explained -- indeed later denied -- hammer it and force it into the main stream media along with the Ali Mohamed story -- the key to outing the CIA's control of al Queda and cultivation of the Myth of Islamo Fascism. Please hit the "progressive" blogs and give up this infighting.
Tarpley has much to offer.
Tarpley has much to offer. I believe he taught us what LIHOP and MIHOP is. He seems to be calling for "clarity" in the movement, but he himself does not seem to be imparting clarity.
Tarpley emphasizes the importance of "knowing who the enemy is" and stopping their next false flag terror attack on us by keeping a watchful eye of military drills and exercises. Well and good but is stopping the next false flag terror attack the number one goal of the 9-11 truth movement? And really, do we know for sure that many people being aware of upcoming military training exercises really does make those exercises either get cancelled or made to not "go live"?
Tarpley emphasizes the importance of the poltical MIHOP "rogue government" operatives and plans. Well and good. But Tarpley apparently cares not to pursuit a criminal investigation so as to identify the rogue criminals and put them 10 feet under or behind bars for life. Tarpley says we need to "stampede the U.S. House of Represenatives" with 9-11 truth so as to keep them from implementing the recommendations of the 9-11 Commission Report and to get them to rescind the things they have already made law since that infamous Report. Tarpley says that is "better than going to court."
Tarpley and his buddy Dan Abrahamson are the ones inciting infighting and factionalism in the 9-11 truth movement. Abrahamson called in to this Tarpley show saying that Jim Fetzer was "pushing a bunch of radical theories" . He said there are people who are calling Dr. Steven Jones a liar. He referred to those people and Dr. Fetzer as "sectarians", a term Tarpley defines as those who hold to one "end all" and "be all" theory and castigate all other efforts of others to have other theories. NOTHING could be further from the truth and I am beginning to lose all respect for Abrahamson. Tarpley I still respect, but Tarpley also said some very negative remarks against Dr. Fetzer on last weeks' show, not yesterday's show, though he did not specifically say Dr. Fetzer's name.
Dr. Fetzer wants there to be open and "democratic" discussion of ALL ideas. He uses the st911 website and the radio shows to engage the open discussion. Dr. Fetzer, who ought to know since he has written books on the philosophy of science, says that it is most important to consider and explore ALL hypotheses to see which ones explain ALL of the available relevant evidence. An energy beam type scenario is not at all "radical" or "far out" and by no means should be locked out of open discussion and scientific consideration.
Dr. Jones attacks Dr. Judy Woods ideas regarding the employment (to some degree) of directed energy weapons. He asks what kind of directed enegy device can be used in the testing of this hypothesis and what frequency will be chosen to use in said scientic test. Dr. Jones implies if you cannot do scientic tests to substantiate an hypothesis, you really have no right at all to even discuss such ideas. He apparently thinks Dr. Fetzer does wrong by even discussing such unscientifically provable ideas. To me, Dr. Jones is looking very very wrong here. I doubt seriously if Dr. Jones is acting within the bounds of good scholarly objective behavior in this matter.
My goal and the clarity I have on the 9-11 truth movement has as its goal the criminal grand jury investigation and indictment of the many crimes that we know have already been committed related to the purloining of the BIG LIE that is the Keane Hamilton Zelikow 9-11 Commission Report. The massive cover-up using all forms of deception related to that big lie that has spawned the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people is a BIG LIE that we already have the legal goods on them to prosecute in a court of law. I say the ST(!! scholars have proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that the official story is a lie. Let's go to court NOW with "what we got" and let the names of the people who orchestrated this attack on Americans be brought forward. It is my prayer that these people be convicted and given the death sentence.
The 9-11 Scholars will never be able to prove what really happened on 9-11 because the holders of 99 percent of the evidence are the chief suspects. It is valuable to explore hypotheses but the fruitfulness of those explorations are fatally handicapped. The Scholars do not seem to want to go to court now, though there are several charges that they could be brought to trial on. Insn't it amazing how there are no attorneys in the 9-11 scholars and truth movement?
Tarpley and Abrahamson dismiss out of hand the going to court option. I am not so quick to dismiss that option. Tarpley says it is very important to have a new independent investigation of 9-11. He says that will wake up the American people to the truth that 9-11 was an inside job and that will spur the American people to somehow take action against the government and that that will somehow be the only thing that can stop World War III. Tarpley does not elaborate how so.
We have all greatly benefitted from the work of Dr. Fetzer, Dr. Jones, and ALL of the 9-11 scholars. But we have to take and run with the only real proved matter they will ever arrive at - that the official story of 9-11 is FALSE. I do not want to go the political route and try to put pressure on our congressmembers. That to me is not the better option. Of course, we know longer have voting. We are being told by Tarpley and Abrahamson and, by lack of action, also the ST911 scholars that filing lawsuits and calling grand juries is not really a fruifull option.
Maybe Meria Heller is right. Maybe the only real option we have is revolution. Maybe that is the "clarity" in the 9-11 truth movement we all need to come to.
Tarpley has much to offer.
Tarpley has much to offer. I believe he taught us what LIHOP and MIHOP is. He seems to be calling for "clarity" in the movement, but he himself does not seem to be imparting clarity.
Tarpley emphasizes the importance of "knowing who the enemy is" and stopping their next false flag terror attack on us by keeping a watchful eye of military drills and exercises. Well and good but is stopping the next false flag terror attack the number one goal of the 9-11 truth movement? And really, do we know for sure that many people being aware of upcoming military training exercises really does make those exercises either get cancelled or made to not "go live"?
Tarpley emphasizes the importance of the poltical MIHOP "rogue government" operatives and plans. Well and good. But Tarpley apparently cares not to pursuit a criminal investigation so as to identify the rogue criminals and put them 10 feet under or behind bars for life. Tarpley says we need to "stampede the U.S. House of Represenatives" with 9-11 truth so as to keep them from implementing the recommendations of the 9-11 Commission Report and to get them to rescind the things they have already made law since that infamous Report. Tarpley says that is "better than going to court."
Tarpley and his buddy Dan Abrahamson are the ones inciting infighting and factionalism in the 9-11 truth movement. Abrahamson called in to this Tarpley show saying that Jim Fetzer was "pushing a bunch of radical theories" . He said there are people who are calling Dr. Steven Jones a liar. He referred to those people and Dr. Fetzer as "sectarians", a term Tarpley defines as those who hold to one "end all" and "be all" theory and castigate all other efforts of others to have other theories. NOTHING could be further from the truth and I am beginning to lose all respect for Abrahamson. Tarpley I still respect, but Tarpley also said some very negative remarks against Dr. Fetzer on last weeks' show, not yesterday's show, though he did not specifically say Dr. Fetzer's name.
Dr. Fetzer wants there to be open and "democratic" discussion of ALL ideas. He uses the st911 website and the radio shows to engage the open discussion. Dr. Fetzer, who ought to know since he has written books on the philosophy of science, says that it is most important to consider and explore ALL hypotheses to see which ones explain ALL of the available relevant evidence. An energy beam type scenario is not at all "radical" or "far out" and by no means should be locked out of open discussion and scientific consideration.
Dr. Jones attacks Dr. Judy Woods ideas regarding the employment (to some degree) of directed energy weapons. He asks what kind of directed enegy device can be used in the testing of this hypothesis and what frequency will be chosen to use in said scientic test. Dr. Jones implies if you cannot do scientic tests to substantiate an hypothesis, you really have no right at all to even discuss such ideas. He apparently thinks Dr. Fetzer does wrong by even discussing such unscientifically provable ideas. To me, Dr. Jones is looking very very wrong here. I doubt seriously if Dr. Jones is acting within the bounds of good scholarly objective behavior in this matter.
My goal and the clarity I have on the 9-11 truth movement has as its goal the criminal grand jury investigation and indictment of the many crimes that we know have already been committed related to the purloining of the BIG LIE that is the Keane Hamilton Zelikow 9-11 Commission Report. The massive cover-up using all forms of deception related to that big lie that has spawned the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people is a BIG LIE that we already have the legal goods on them to prosecute in a court of law. I say the ST(!! scholars have proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that the official story is a lie. Let's go to court NOW with "what we got" and let the names of the people who orchestrated this attack on Americans be brought forward. It is my prayer that these people be convicted and given the death sentence.
The 9-11 Scholars will never be able to prove what really happened on 9-11 because the holders of 99 percent of the evidence are the chief suspects. It is valuable to explore hypotheses but the fruitfulness of those explorations are fatally handicapped. The Scholars do not seem to want to go to court now, though there are several charges that they could be brought to trial on. Insn't it amazing how there are no attorneys in the 9-11 scholars and truth movement?
Tarpley and Abrahamson dismiss out of hand the going to court option. I am not so quick to dismiss that option. Tarpley says it is very important to have a new independent investigation of 9-11. He says that will wake up the American people to the truth that 9-11 was an inside job and that will spur the American people to somehow take action against the government and that that will somehow be the only thing that can stop World War III. Tarpley does not elaborate how so.
We have all greatly benefitted from the work of Dr. Fetzer, Dr. Jones, and ALL of the 9-11 scholars. But we have to take and run with the only real proved matter they will ever arrive at - that the official story of 9-11 is FALSE. I do not want to go the political route and try to put pressure on our congressmembers. That to me is not the better option. Of course, we know longer have voting. We are being told by Tarpley and Abrahamson and, by lack of action, also the ST911 scholars that filing lawsuits and calling grand juries is not really a fruifull option.
Maybe Meria Heller is right. Maybe the only real option we have is revolution. Maybe that is the "clarity" in the 9-11 truth movement we all need to come to.
Tarpley's show
I just listened to Tarpley's show and found his and Meria's comments quite depressing. They sounded like there is very little chance for a political or legal solution to this problem. They seemed to think the only thing that will work is a revolution. I don't agree. We live in a world where things change very fast. Right now the 9/11 truth movement is in a lull, for lack of a better word. That could all change overnight. Someone could step up and spill the beans. There could be a military coupe. A foreign power could expose 9/11. The list of possibilities is endless. In the meantime we must keep putting the truth out there. Something will break soon. Trust me on that one.................."Every Dog Has His Day."
agreed
...and as I continue to remind: hanging out here with the choir is comforting and the best place to catch the latest breaking news on 911; but continue to urge: use 911blogger as a refueling stop, then hit the blogs where the fence-sitters twitter on about various related issues, but never take the plunge -- jump in and give them a push; e.g. I just now found about a half-dozen reviews of "Triple Cross," mostly on indie blogs, where I left comments calling it a "limited hangout" and directing readers to "911 Synthetic Terror..." for the real story on Ali Mohammad and Able Danger. 2 big sites to hit hard: http://www.Truthdig.com & http://www.huffingtonpost.com -- soldier on!