I was banned by the Pilots_for_Truth Forums without warning. I had learned a lot there but just could not accept the fact that they still are pushing that Flight 77 crashed into the pentagon.
They were good for getting links to sources like Pilots Flight manuals and technical info regarding transponders. I had learned from the massive amount of technical material they suggested that I read and when I posted my thoughts that resulted and asked "How am I doing?". I couldn't access it anymore.

I had originally joined that forum in an attempt to try and locate where it could have landed so the hijackers could get off.

It is my opinion that they know more than they are telling and aren't interested in the truth after all. They just want to lead people in circles and sell them DVDs.

I also lost a lot of information because a was able to go back to view prior postings. I couldn't get back in to print any of my postings.

My posting was something along the lines of the following for the four flights (this was before I learned that the two American Airlines flights did not exist.
1) United 93 - landed in a Cleveland Airport - news article posted on 9/11/01 - source of the report was the Mayor of Cleveland. After the article was made known on a national radio broadcast in 2004. They retracted the article. I believe the article was correct. Reinforced by the lack of an airplane at the Shanksville alleged "Crash site". And testimony recorded by the local TV recorders. My current status - missing in action.
2) Flight 11 - Since the Flight Transponders are controllable manually in the cockpit and the flight signal that is transmitted is the result of manually entering a specific code number. And that the video 9/11 In Plane Site points out that the flash from the second plane crash that did not have windows, has a very visible pod underneath, has the engines distance from the fuselage adjusted to offset the weight imbalance as pointed out by a Spanish investigative reporter from the picture that was on the cover of Newsday magazine, that some of the hijackers were found alive in Saudi Arabia and other countries My mind tends to think that Flight 11 landed someplace else also. But again that was before I learned that Flight 11 was not scheduled for 9/11 to start with and there is a discrepancy regarding that it boarded from two different gate numbers. My current belief is that it didn't exist and that the 1st plane that crashed was not a flimsy passenger airplane at all. It was a specially made military aircraft. Boeing refused to answer any questions about the aircraft.
3) United Flight 175 - second plane crash into tower. Clearly a military reinforced specialty built aircraft similar to Flight 11. The United 93 article mentions Flight 175.
4) American Airline Flight 77. My original theory at the time was that the Transponder was turned off while it was in the air and another Aircraft that was already in the air entered the Code for Flight 77. I learned that Air Controllers wouldn't be able to tell of a switch if one piggybacked the other. But that also was before that I learned that Flight 77 was not scheduled for that day and did not exist.

Please note that there were abnormalities with each flight, both with the transponders "turned off by the hijackers" and Flight Data recorders such as Flight 77. NIST released a video of a simulation that the did from Flight 77's. I learned in Pilots for Truth that the Altitude was 400 ft higher than the "crash".

I have had so many problems with the Wiki net-traffic wardens/meter maids. Once you try to talk sense to any of them they dig their heels in a just keep trying to justify their actions, not listen to reasonable debate!!

A little power in the hands of some people can be so dangerous.

CCC-Media