Ex-employee says FAA warned before 9/11

USA Today has finally started looking at a story first reported by Patriots Question 9/11. Here's USA's Today story:

"From 1995 to 2001, Bogdan Dzakovic served as a team leader on the Federal Aviation Administration's Red Team. Set up by Congress to help the FAA think like terrorists, the elite squad tested airport security systems.

In the years leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Dzakovic says, the team was able to breach security about 90% of the time, sneaking bombs and submachine guns past airport screeners. Expensive new bomb detection machines consistently failed, he says.

The team repeatedly warned the FAA of the potential for security breaches and hijackings but was told to cover up its findings, Dzakovic says.

Eventually, the FAA began notifying airports in advance when the Red Team would be doing its undercover testing, Dzakovic says. He and other Red Team members approached the Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General, the General Accounting Office and members of Congress about the FAA's alleged misconduct regarding the Red Team's aviation security tests. No one did anything, he says.

Then came 9/11.

"Immediately (after 9/11), numerous government officials from FAA as well as other government agencies made defensive statements such as, 'How could we have known this was going to happen?' " Dzakovic testified later before the 9/11 Commission. "The truth is, they did know."

About a month after 9/11, he filed a complaint with the Office of the Special Counsel, the government agency that investigates whistle-blower cases. It alleged that the FAA had covered up Red Team findings. A subsequent Department of Transportation Inspector General's report, ordered by the OSC in response to Dzakovic's complaint, concluded that the "Red Team program was grossly mismanaged and that the result was a serious compromise of public safety."

After filing his complaint, Dzakovic was removed from his Red Team leadership position. He now works for the Transportation Security Administration, which has responsibility for airport security. His primary assignments include tasks such as hole-punching, updating agency phonebooks and "thumb-twiddling," he says. At least he hasn't received a pay cut, he says. He makes about $110,000 a year for what he describes as "entry-level idiot work."

TSA spokesman Darrin Kayser would not comment on Dzakovic's allegations that he was retaliated against for being a whistle-blower. He said in an e-mail, "While TSA transitioned functions out of FAA, many employees were doing work outside of their pre-9/11 duties. Once TSA was established, Mr. Dzakovic did find a productive position within the agency and has been a valued contributor in our efforts to provide the highest level of security in all modes of transportation."

no wonder this got coverage

no wonder this got coverage - it's all LIHOP!

and LIHOP means: Only the Bush administration and others who 'neglected security' have to go, and have to be replaced by those seeking even 'tougher' security, that better fulfill the neocon agenda, with even more police state laws, even more bias against Muslims, and an even bigger War On Terror.

- not that anything would have to be done about deceptions, misleading lies, wasted trillions, etc.

exactly

hey, I hear Hillary Clinton is really TOUGH on security!

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

I always thought there was a

I always thought there was a qualitative difference in allowing something to happen on purpose (LIHOP) and being careless or incompetent.

Right, and

as Webster Tarpley points out, the "patsy" side of the equation is just as important as the "made it happen on purpose" side.

These things BOTH OCCUR IN FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS!

Get it?

The rogues make it happen on purpose, but set up elaborate patsies to take the fall. Get it?

What I meant was that even

What I meant was that even if they hadn't blown up the towers etc (=MIHOP) and even if the hijackers had been real, just allowing the attacks to proceed unimpeded (=LIHOP) would have been a criminal act, different from mere negligence or incompetence. Get my point?

I hear you. They either

I hear you.

They either made it happen or let it happen, and if they let it happen, they MADE it happen. That is, they are just as responsible as if they had made it happen.

LIHOP is a cozy(or lazy) stepping stone some need before they can come to terms with reality. Sort of like a gay person trying on 'bi' before they come out of the closet.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Bravo

I just want to say thank you to all the people who come forward with the truth.

What hijackers?

In the years leading up to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Dzakovic says, the team was able to breach security about 90% of the time, sneaking bombs and submachine guns past airport screeners. Expensive new bomb detection machines consistently failed, he says.

The team repeatedly warned the FAA of the potential for security breaches and hijackings but was told to cover up its findings, Dzakovic says.

What difference does it make? There were no hijackers, remember?

right--BUT their passports exist, and likely did the hijackings

There is no evidence of hijackers, but there was clear evidence of their passports at each of the crime scenes. Which leads me to believe that we've been thinking about this the wrong way. What if the PASSPORTS themselves hijacked the planes? I know that sounds bizarre, but as a community we have to be open to new and exciting avenues of research. To those who say that a passport could not have been responsible for slitting all those passengers' throats I would ask have you never gotten a nasty papercut? What is most frightening in all of this is that the passports, having survived the crashes, might have killed again had it not been for their capture by astute agents rushing to the scene.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

Bwahahaha

Oh my God, that was funny.

no doubt, and you cant look

no doubt, and you cant look past the fact that at least one of the passports was super-human and capable of withstanding jetfuel explosions. not the kind of passport you wanna mess with. im sure Judy Wood and obviously still current Bush administration member Morgan Reynolds will have a paper on this newest, most exciting theory soon.

Not the kind of passport you wanna mess with...

Survived jet fuel explosions? Dude, that passport survived a space beam attack!

oh crap, thats right, im

oh crap, thats right, im getting my Judy Wood theory of the week mixed up with my own personal theory. it survived both jet fuel explosions and space beams. also probably mini nukes just to top it off, cant forget them.

silly truther--space beams don't hurt paper

that's why Judy Jetson and Uncle Fetzer point out all the paper strewn around Manhattan as proof of the space beam. See, space beam beats scissors, scissors beat paper, and paper beats space beams. Would you people PLEASE READ the research before commenting? You're like, hurting the movement.

:-P

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force