In my amateur opinion:

I found the omission of Ms. Edmonds testimony highly suspicious. The Commission had a historical opportunity to explain how and WHY 9/11 occurred. If incompetence, a forgivable human failing was in fact a contributing factor in the successful execution of the 9/11 attack, then those who were "incompetent" should have been relieved of their positions. No? Forgivable maybe, but that does not mean people should have retained their sensitive positions NOR ESPECIALLY received promotion and praise.... as many did. WTF? Something stinks!

This "incompetence" was more than just a contributing factor, for without it, the success of the attack would have been greatly reduced. No?

In my mind, I therefor must view the "incompetence" as a large and necessary component of the 9/11 operation's extensive success. Am I talking a foreign language here? I have not yet said MYHOP (we'll talk about that later), for now, I am just establishing the simple fact, that the Commission FAILED in properly explaining that which they were created explicitly to do. Not just in the one example of Sibel, but also the role, or lack of, military defense and preparedness (our military has NOT been dependent on Morris Code and vacuum tubes for a long time, even though their response that day appeared equally and anachronically retarded).

Combined with the omission of testimony and a proper critique of defense preparedness, the commission ALSO made light of the crime scene investigation (as in: unimportant). The historical concept of evidence was casually ignored. Proof was alluded to, but NOT documented in ANY traditional sense. Evidence was blatantly tampered with as bare hands scrambling about the Pentagon lawn to pick it up "aircraft parts" as fast as humanly possible, cranes and trucks hauling away WTC debris for smelting, land-fill, and off-shore dumping.... WTF?

Moving wreckage in order to save buried lives or uncover crushed bodies is one thing... smelting, dumping and literally BURYING evidence (and posting guards and legal road-blocks to GREATLY hinder further examination....), is something quite different. WTF?

There was no CSI, there was no forthright and painful as it may have been, examination of defense preparedness... important testimony was omitted concerning money laundering, massive drug trafficking, and nuclear black-market.... and WHOM in the U.S. is up to their neck in it, such "trusted" people like dirty-as-sin Denny-Boy Hastert. As tragic as 9/11 was.... nuclear proliferation is hideous by comparison, and not just "remotely tangental" to the players and interests, the motives, of the 9/11 attack.

Sibel has never claimed to be in possession of key-stone information for understanding and/or apprehending the 9/11 trigger crew. However, she is a brilliantly colorful dab from the painters pallet. Including her testimony along with others helps to paint a vastly more complete and accurate picture of a world where 9/11 is a smallish bit-detail within a mural of government corruption where wanton killing is "all in a days work".

Only "a piece of the puzzle" she may be... but if that piece completes a picture illustrating the truer nature of our modern U.S. government, and helps We the People come to terms with the simple fact that Our government has grossly mutated into a malevolent tool of oppression, tyranny and classic criminal shenanigans leaving a trail of blood and guts.... I want my fellow people to know.... so as to have any chance of correcting this state of affairs.

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness... which I swear is worthy of my very own life when called to defend other genuine innocents.

("Get to know" so the saying goes.... all you worthless shit-bags clinging to high office. Get to work, get lost, or come to terms with the willpower of simple people seeking freedom from your LIES!)