For all those uninformed members of the Truth Movement community that may never had heard about the man that Mr. George W. Bush nominated for Attorney General before his Wikipedia page includes "Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center.[6]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_B._Mukasey

I am a Forensic Accountant and to be perfectly honest, I never gave the events of 9/11 any of my attention when they happened. My wife had been shopping the the Century 21 store across the street when the first plane hit, she went into her office and called me. I was on the telephone with her when I heard the second plane it. Being busy with the fraud case, I strongly suggested that she leave work, head away from the Towers by going East and North, and call me to pick her up. I did not hear from her again until she arrived home near midnight.

I was researching something else yesterday and quite by accident I ran into the following webpage.
http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/

"American President: An Online Reference Resource
In-depth information reviewed by prominent scholars on each President and administration
Welcome to the redesigned AmericanPresident.org web site. Here you will find the content from the original site in an improved presentation. We have more fully integrated AmericanPresident.org with its longtime host, the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, the nation’s leading research institute for the study of the American presidency.

Our editors are working on updating the Key Events section and portions of the Presidency in Action section of the former web site.

There is a current news report "U.S.: Military alone can't beat Taliban" by Chris Brummitt, AP writer at the link below.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070830/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_taliban;_ylt=AjMXUTNm4cfk0mDIq3aXwMpbbBAF

The source of the information included in the article is from Maj. Gen. Robert Cone, a top U.S. commander who noted that most insurgencies end with a political solution.

The article states in part: "Hundreds of former members of the hard-line Taliban regime, including a sprinkling of former senior commanders and officials, have reconciled with the government since they were ousted from power in the U.S.-led invasion in 2001."

Am I wrong in believing that we were originally told that we invaded Afghanistan chasing Osama Bin Laden and his Saudi Arabian hijackers, er, Al-CIAda?

There is a News article posted at Yahoo from Montebello, Quebec.
"Bush Acknowledges Frustration in Iraq"
By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070821/ap_on_re_ca/bush;_ylt=Arlqlu._kLU9HSVaGQozlfIUewgF

The following is what Bush said about the Iraqi government.

"The fundamental question is, will the government respond to the demands of the people," the president said. "And if the government doesn't ... respond to the demands of the people, they will replace the government. That's up to the Iraqis to make that decision, not American politicians."

Maybe he ought to start listening to himself because Bush has made it clear that his government isn't responding to the demands of the American people. So does Bush mean that the American people should replace the Bush government ?

The CIA will celebrate their 60th anniversary on July 26, 2007.

That's 60 years of violating not only the Constitution of the United States but also the Charter of the United Nations that was signed in 1945 with 49 other countries and the God given rights that every other human being on the planet.

60 years of covert operations, training people how to administer torture, assassinations, Coup d'etats, controlled demolitions, drug trafficking, smuggling, spying, breaking other countries agents into defecting, being double agents, causing chaos, kidnapping and the list goes on and on.

Osama bin-Laden had been trained and financed by the CIA to fight the Russians when they were in Afghanistan. Did we really get to see Osama's gratitude on 9/11 for helping him with the Russians or is Osama still performing a covert operation for the CIA ?

Is that the loyalty that we are to expect from all the others that the CIA trained?

Maybe Congress should stop the funding of the Central Intelligence Agency and allocate the multi-billions to other things like health care and social security.

The 2007 Macy's Fourth of July FIREWORKS display just goes to show how advanced humans have become with the technology dealing with explosives.

It's a shame that the staged 9/11 events that were used to steal our Constitutional rights via the Patriot Act and other pre-written legislation are similar to the technology that was used to time the fiery displays in the sky to the music.
What an accomplishment. The people who plan the fireworks display each year deserve the praise.

However, the people who planned and planted the explosives in the three buildings for 9/11 deserve to be in jail, despite the nice careful work and lack of damage to the surrounding buildings. I don't understand how they can think that they were being Patriotic. Most of them were breaking their oaths and are traitors.

The lack of damage to the other buildings near the buildings that were located on property other than the Port Authority of NY & NJ is an indication of how precise the work was that brought down the three (3) buildings with the assistance of Controlled Demolition.

Every United States government official and member of the US Military have taken oaths that include the phrase "to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic".

I believe that George H. W. Bush has organized and is operating the Bush Crime Family. Said family has, with the assistance of many other members of the elite and secret covert operations agencies from other countries around the world, pulled of a coup of the government of this country.

The Bush Crime Family is being permitted, perhaps unwittingly by some people, to destroy this country with their treasonous acts. By treasonous acts I mean the complete disregard for the desires of the American people (i.e. fraudulent elections of 2000 and 2004); illegal invasion of Iraq based on intentionally misleading intelligence; mass murder and use of WMD on the citizens of this country on 9/11/2001; conspiracy with the insurance fraud for the "Jewish Lightening" that struck the World Trade Center the same day and the failure to have a fair and independent investigations.

Ah, I may as well start at the beginning rather than go back and forth.

The January 31, 2007 issue of "Community News" has the above named story on Page 3.

The "Community News" is a weekly newspaper circulated in Lodi, Hasbrouck Heights, Wood-Ridge, Maywood and Rochelle Park New Jersey. The issue features a picture of Fair Lawn, New Jersey resident Robert Gulack who was affected by the air around Ground Zero after 9/11 on the first page as a highlight to the article on Page 3.

The newspaper quotes Mr. Gulack as saying "This is the worst case of abuse by the government the United States has had in its history."

Mr. Gulack was in Washington and attended the State of the Union Address as a guest of U.S. Rep Jerrold Nadler along with retired North Arlington Police Chief Joseph Zadroga.

Mr. Gulack returned to work near Ground Zero and Zadroga, whose police detective son's death has been linked to toxic air in his lungs after he did rescue work at Ground Zero, "were on hand as reminders that the attack is impacting lives to this day."

I had drafted a Blog about how I think war is the maijn economy of Bagdad. After I finished it I had a thought that wouldn't it be nice if someone offered to give President Bush his 21,000 extra troops if he agreed to cooperate with a new independent 9/11/01 investigation.
Just a dream I guess.

Apparently, President Bush is more concerned pumping our money into the Iraqis economy than our own.

The Iraqis are playing President Bush like the fool he is. They know he won't take the troops out. It wouldn't surprise me if Bush told the Iraqi Prime Minister what he wanted to do and said it was the Iraqi's idea. The greedy Iraqi polititcians wouldn't have anybody to bribe them without the war. How can you have a Democracy like the Americans and their freedoms without bribery?

How may more unaccountable billions of US dollars are going to be part of the "millions comming from the Iraqi government"?

The dumb arrogant Americans are still buying the "we haven't been attacked here since 2001" line. They know 9/11 was a put up job. President Bush has lost his mind. He still thinks that American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. They do have a memorial there don't they? He did lay a wreath there didn't he?

The article by Mark Lander is located at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/europe/09germany.html.

On Monday a German court "sentenced a friend of the September 11 hijackers to 15 years in prison for being an accessory in the murders of 246 people aboard the commercial planes used in the attacks."

The article states "The sentencing of the man, a Moroccan named Mounire el-Motassadeq, is a potentially decisive milestone in a complex and politically delicate case that has wended its way through the German courts for 5 years."

Apparently, he went to Germany in 1993 to study engineering and fell in with a "radical Islamic group in Hamburg that included two of the hijackers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, is one of only two people to be convicted in the 9/11 attacks. The other - Zacarias Moussaoui, a French citizen of Moroccan descent - is serving a life sentence in Colorado."

Mr. Motassadeq was first tried in 2003 and was found guilty of 3,066 counts of accessory to murder but that verdict was overturned on appeal and he was put on trial a second time.

It goes on to say that the German prosecutors struggled to make a case "in part because of what they said was a lack of cooperation from the United States in sharing evidence".

.... located at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061230/ap_on_re_us/attacks_remains&printer=1.
It is titled "Search for human remains exapands at WTC".

I hope the people finding the debris are not continuing the practice of destruction of evidence. The Crews that are sifting through the material should be instructed that the WTC-related debris such as computer parts, office carpet, electrical wires and steel are all evidence in the largest mass murder in our nations histiory.

There should be supervisors who have the ability and forensic knowledge to bag and tag the evidence for a trail to be used when the evildoers are finally brought to justice. In no way should the evidence be turned over to the FBI or other governmental agecy to safeguard. The WTC 7 controlled demolition can be used as a reason that they are not competent to protect evidence.

If a Court order is required the relatives of the families should have an attorney file whatever papers are necessary to protec the integrity of this evidence.

Apparently, God is on our side and wants us to continue to work for truth justice and the real American way.

...the Freedom Tower.

One of the points in the 12-16-2006 NY Times article located at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/16/nyregion/16spitzer.html?_r=1&n=Top%2fRefrence%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fP%2fPort%20Authority%20of%20New%20York%20And%20New%20Jersey%20&oref=slogin

NYS' "Governor-elect Eliot Spitzer’s choice to lead the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said yesterday that the Spitzer team would take a “fresh look” at the Freedom Tower project at ground zero.

Mr. Spitzer cautioned that it was premature to say whether plans would change, but the new Port Authority leader, Anthony E. Shorris, said there was little flexibility to make a major overhaul.

The comments came at a news conference where Mr. Spitzer named Mr. Shorris to be executive director of the Port Authority and also tapped 11 others for top jobs in his administration. Half of the appointees are current or former members of Mr. Spitzer’s staff in the attorney general’s office...."

".... Mr. Shorris’s remarks about a top-to-bottom review of the Freedom Tower reflected private comments made recently by some Spitzer advisers. They have vowed to examine everything from the project’s cost and leasing viability to its height, which Gov. George E. Pataki helped set at 1,776 feet.

Here is another amazing set of coincidences that relate to the 9/11/2001 events.
The President signed Public Law 107-42 on 9/22/2001.
It an Act "To preserve the continued viability of the United States air transportation system" and is commonly known as the "Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act".

Amazingly, someone kept their head enough through all the surprise 9/11 "attacks" and realized that there would be a need for this type of legislation. Apparently, these approximately 12 pages of technical legislation were not only drafted but it had also been printed and circulated it to both the House (H.R. 2926) and Senate (S.1450), where, on 9/21/01 it was considered and passed by both Houses of Congress in just 10 days.

In TITLE I - AIRLINE STABILIZATION
It provides, in part, for the President "shall take the following actions to compensate air carriers for losses incurred by the air carriers as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001."
"(1) Subject to such terms and conditions as the President deems necessary, to issue Federal credit instruments to air carriers that do not, in the total aggregate, exceed $10,000,000,000 and to provide subsidy amounts necessary for such instruments in accordance with provisions of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2U.S.C. 661 et seq.)

As I see it, every person appointed for any position in the government should be asked the following question.

Do you believe that an airplane crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?

The Senate confirmed President George W. Bush's choice for Donald Rumsfeld's replacement as Secretary of Defense without asking that question.

I believe that they have confirmed just another soft spoken C.I.A. insider willing to play the game for a few more years. I believe that he is the only C.I.A. agent to have made it to the top. I wonder why ??? Was he recruited by this President's father ? What brought him out of retirement ? It can't be patriotism because he never brought up the subject either.

I am very disappointed, but not surprised, that none of the Senators that were on the Confirmation Committee dared ask that question. Especially the ones that have 2008 Presidential aspirations. I will be looking for someone to vote for who isn't afraid to speak the truth and ask the tough questions.

Maybe the new Democrat takeover of both houses of Congress isn't going to be as effective as we wanted it to be. We can still hope that when they open their first session that I will be proven wrong.

According to the Yahoo News http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061125/ap_on_go/democrats_iraq
The new Democrat Congress has set as one of their goals
"_Enacting the Sept. 11 Commission's security recommendations".

We all are aware that the Commission was faulty. I think that if the new Congress Enacts any legislation that resulted from the faulty investigation is a mistake. Politically for them, financially for us and we may lose more of our Constitutional Rights in the process.

The correct way would be for Congress to form their own independent investigation and arrive at their own recommendations (if any are necessary).

I think that by them releasing this information we are obligated to respond that we do not want any legislation that came out of the faulty Commission until they have an independent Congressional Committee with "Subpoena Power" and a multi million dollar budget to arrive at their own conclusions and recommendations, if any are really necessary.

Perhaps the funding can come from the insurance companies that failed to investigate the claims filed or did the insurance companies have a magic ball that showed that the investigation of the Commission would agree with cause on the claims that were filed and argued in Court before the end of 2001. How many billions of dollars did that cost us in higher insurance rates for the new Terrorism Risk product that the Bush Administration gave them to sell which covered the losses.