it is bizarre how the mostly hollow aluminum plane can cut through massive boxed steel columns. it's also strange that they left out the boxed steel portion of the columns. The boxed steel is the the criss-cross matrix of more steel girders wrapped around the columns themselves.

when straw pierces an oak tree or telephone pole in a tornado.
please don't ever use this softer aluminum wing crap again. thanks.
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00325.htm
__________________________
http://anti-neocons.com/

maybe you didn't read why your theory is indeed "crap"
(from the link provided in my earlier post)
The mechanical properties of a projectile
depends on its speed. For example, if I take a soft lead bullet and press it
slowly against a steel plate, say 0.5 cm thick, using a mechanical press, it
would deform into a lead disc and the steel plate would be largely
unaffected. However, if I take the same soft lead bullet and it's fired from
a 0.357 Magnum, it would easily blow a large hole in the same steel plate.
The difference is that deformation of a projectile takes a certain amount of
time to occur. If the impact time is very short compared to this
characteristic time of deformation, the mechanical properties of the object
will be very different. This is not an uncommon phenomenon.

__________________________
http://anti-neocons.com/

space "junk" or " debris can do when striking other earth orbiting items, like satellites or the space shuttle, at 17000 mph. A small bolt or nut which weighs practically nothing, travelling at 17000 mph, can seriously damage or even destroy much bigger/heavier/stronger things in orbit. This is not speculation, its a known fact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

A chuck of insulation foam fell off, hit the wing, and damaged insulation of the wing. It was reentry heat that did most of the damage, due to breach of the wing's integrity. It was not the debris itself that destroyed the wing.

fair point, but off point. the point is a spec of paint flying at 17000 mph could puncture an aluminum satellite, for example.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

but the point is also that a steel building with a relative impact velocity of 500 mph would destroy the plane. The aluminum airframe is weak. The engines and the fuel-laden portion of the wing between the engines would probably have enough kinetic energy to shear the columns, but the whole plane would not penetrate seamlessly. That's what NIST claims:

http://ningens-blog.blogspot.com/2007/05/screenshots-of-nists-flight-175...

A speck of paint seems like an exaggeration. A small piece of aluminum - 0.7 mm - can penetrate a 2.5 mm aluminum satellite surface at 21,000 mph. "Smaller impacts, which can degrade mission performance or cause mission denial, are much more common with tens of thousands, if not millions of such impacts/m2 of exposed surface area occurring throughout a satellite's lifetime. "

http://setas-www.larc.nasa.gov/LDEF/MET_DEB/md_impact.html

.

yes, straw is in fact hollow. whether we're talking about a drinking straw or the natural variety. lead bullets, not that i'm aware of, but it doesn't really matter. i hope you're being paid well to waste away your days getting laughed at.
__________________________
http://anti-neocons.com/

Um doesn't that severely contradict your theory that something much less durable can't penetrate something much more durable?

http://user.bahnhof.se/~wizard/cryptoworld/bird-plane3.jpg
http://user.bahnhof.se/~wizard/cryptoworld/edb1.jpg

Come on KT give it up already.

_______________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!" -Dr. Frank Greening

"Shilltown" still at disinfo central? You doing overtime or something? I thought you got told to go clear your desk for being so ineffective and blatantly shill like. Consider what accessory after the fact means.

Yeah, flight 77 did such relatively little damage to the Pentagon, yet they are
trying to tell us that the same kind of planes that hit the WTC towers ripped out all those huge columns
of steel.

They cant have it both ways.

"Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past"
George Orwell 1984

Incidently, i was just wondering what would have happened if either of the WTC planes had hit the buildings between floors.
Surely the buildings are stronger at the points where the floors are attached, and the planes might not have penetrated into the buildings
as much as they did.. It is this penetration that the official story rests on, if they had hit the outside, exploded and fell to the ground, no one would have believed it would be enough to bring the buildings down.

This could lend weight to the theory that the planes were in some way computer guided into the buildings to avoid the high degree of probability of at least one of the them hitting between floors.

Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past"
George Orwell 1984

Use that line in your next bit of drivel.

Imagine 100 tons travelling at 500mph actually penetrating some steel columns.

Implossible! It should have bounced right off like a rubber ball if it wasn't a hologram!

Who writes this shit?

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.

Yeah this guy is a no-planer,
no-planer....no-brainer
i just made that up....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past"
George Orwell 1984

its because the entirety of the bird's mass is focused into one small area of the wing, rupturing the stronger alumium, and damaging the bird - much like the entirety of the planes were focused into the facades of the buildings, rupturing the stronger steel, and damiging the palnes. Your example refutes your argument.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB