Why is it that in the picture you posted above, there are only 11 intact stories in the southwest corner of WTC 7 below the two stories of burnt-out windows, whereas in the picture at

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth914/FigD_01.jpg

there are at least 15 intact stories below the same point?

I know someone posted that picture recently for comparison to the one above -- but for some reason I couldn't make visual sense of it. Now I can. Does anyone think the two contradictory images are NOT highly suggestive of alteration to the "damaged corner" image?

It attempts to portray that the corner is massively damaged / missing from floor 18 down (and that's from the picture in the official FEMA report).

Where as a high quality picture taken late afternoon (below) from the other side of the Hudson...





In the above picture, just above the "Winter Garden" building is floor 12 of the south west corner of WTC7, to me the corner appears intact, as is the corner above for many floors, therefore I cannot reconcile the damage shown on the "official" picture...


The original can be found at http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/ (towards bottom - say 90% down - above night shots)


Something does not jive...

Best wishes

How do we know the picture above was taken late afternoon?

The corner is definitely there in that picture.

As I have said before, I have ALWAYS found the other picture somehow "unreal" and suspected something was wrong with it.

I think this needs to be investigated very carefully...

So the points being made are not lost, they are :

• The [ FEMA Picture ] of south-west corner damage to WTC7 from floor 18 and below, is disputed by [ visual evidence ]




• The [ Fire Damage ] caused to the last four windows on floors 29 and 30, happened prior to 11:35am. Confirmed by EXIF data of [ This Picture ], further corroborated by EXIF data of [ This Picture ]




• Similar [ Fire Damage ] not as severe as above, can be seen on floors 22 and 23, these floors housed the Mayor's OEM bunker which was supposedly impenetrable. This was not present in the [ 11:35am Picture ]





---




Regarding Vesa's query...

How do we know the picture above was taken late afternoon?


I cannot give an exact time, as the pictures used were taken on 35mm film, with no EXIF data.

You can find the entire collection at : http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/

If you look at the following pictures, they will hopefully demonstrate to you how the sun travelled around the WTC site from the east in the morning to the south, then the west.


Early picture at 10am, sun only visible on east face of WTC7, not visible on south face.




Time about 10:30am, sun starting to shine across south face of WTC7, most buildings south and west faces still in shade.




On the photo is question, all the western faces of buildings are illuminated (including WTC7), how long before 5:20pm this was taken, I am unsure (any helpers).




Time 5:20pm, taken just as WTC7 started to collapse. Sunlight fully on west side of WTC7, north face has no sunlight on it (can be confirmed in all WTC7 collapse videos).





That's all I have at the moment, If I get a more accurate time I will post.

Best wishes and good luck

with regards to when this picture was taken...





and he states...

If I recall correctly, probably around 2

A very nice and friendly guy.

Best wishes

For some reason this doesn't seem to rouse discussion...

It would be important to find out when the two pictures were captured.

I wonder if further analysis of material shown on TV on and after September 11 would reveal more interesting things about WTC 7. I think it is strange how few good pictures there are of building 7.

Here are some more rare images of WTC7

http://www.attivissimo.net/11settembre/wtc7/06-incendi-pompieri-rapporti...

The strange thing is that none of the images and videos i could find show anything but smoke below the 18th-19th floor. The only one i know is this one

This would be well worth researching i think.

Isn't NIST still withholding 7000 pictures and videos?

someone on the Loose Change forums made this comparison pic between the two photo's.

casseia, was this the comparison you had difficulty making visual sense of?

In the picture to the right, the corner seems to be in pretty good shape. As both Twin Towers had collapsed when it was captured, what could have caused the kind of damage shown in the left picture (assuming it was captured later)?

It may be time to start asking some serious questions about this - from NIST, from the debunkers, and perhaps even from the police, among others.

In the more damaged picture, area around the damage is pale. A sign of tampering? The CCTV footage at the Pentagon has a simular problem, looking pale and washed out.

(if this was addressed in the video, sorry for the redundancy--I'm trying not to spend too much time on the computer today, so I'm skipping the vid for now)

Also, if WTC7 was supposedly damaged by the falling debis of 1 and 2, shouldn't the TOP or TOP SIDES show some damage? Is debri supossed to have hit the street and BOUNCED into the lower floors?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Good questions and observations, Jenny. I hadn't paid attention to the paleness.

The upper parts of WTC 7 suffered minor debris damage. I think it was to be expected that debris ejected from the North Tower "banana-peeling" itself would have landed above all on the lower parts of WTC 7.

When considering which parts would have been expected to receive debris damage, one must remember that WTC 6 was between the North Tower and WTC 7. That eight-story building was partially destroyed when the North Tower fell.

Footage of the damage on the upper part of WTC7

Notice the black 'band', wonder what that is.

Spreading it already, here is a torrent:

http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3636751