KSFR's Camp Lovewave Hosts Bill and Kathy Christison re: 9/11 and Israel/Palestine

Short notice on this one, tune in today (Saturday) at 10 AM Mountain time (12 Eastern):

Mother Media News Alert

New Mexico's KSFR 90.7 FM Radio to Host CIA Veterans in Discussion of 9/11 and the Israel - Palestine Issue
Saturday, 12/16 at 10AM Mountain Time on www.ksfr.org and archived at www.prx.org

12/15/2006 - Santa Fe, New Mexico (Mother Media)

KSFR radio show Camp Lovewave will host CIA veterans Bill and Kathy Christison in another discussion of their views on the 9/11 attacks and the situation on the ground in Israel/Palestine on Saturday, December 15th at 10AM Mountain Time. Bill Christison, a 25 year veteran of the CIA has made clear his position that 9/11 could have been an inside job in a piece for Dissident Voice (www.dissidentvoice.org) entitled "Stop Belittling the Theories of September 11th." Christison, who served as Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis, joins a large contingent of military, political and intelligence professionals who have questioned the official story of 9/11 at the website www.patriotsquestion911.com .

After discussing the problems with the official story regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings 1,2 and 7, and the anomalies at the Pentagon, Christison concludes that these particular datapoints "strongly suggest that some unnamed persons or groups either inside or with ties to the government were actively creating a “Pearl Harbor” event, most likely to gain public support for the aggressive foreign policies that followed -- policies that would, first, “transform” the entire Middle East, and second, expand U.S. global domination."

Bill's wife, Kathy Christison, has published extensively on the situation in Palestine, and her books at www.christison-santefe.com are recognized scholarly works on the subject. The two of them release articles regularly on counterpunch.org and the most recent one chronicles their recent trip to Palestine. Their 45 minute slide show is available for theaters and community groups by contacting them at bill.kathy@christison-santafe.com .

The two of them pull no punches in their recent article entitled: "Genocide or Erasure of Palestinians," and lay it on the line based on their eyewitness testimony:

"In fact, it matters little what you call it, so long as it is recognized that what Israel intends and is working toward is the erasure of the Palestinian people from the Palestine landscape. Israel most likely does not care about how systematic its efforts at erasure are, or how rapidly they proceed, and in these ways it differs from the Nazis. There are no gas chambers; there is no overriding urgency. Gas chambers are not needed. A round of rockets on a residential housing complex in the middle of the night here, a few million cluster bomblets or phosphorous weapons there can, given time, easily meet the UN definition above [of genocide.]

Children shot to death sitting in school classrooms here, families murdered while tilling their land there; agricultural land stripped and burned here, farmers cut off from their land there; little girls riddled with bullets here, infants beheaded by shell fire there; a little massacre here, a little starvation there; expulsion here, denial of entry and families torn apart there; dispossession is the name of the game. With no functioning economy, dwindling food supplies, medical supply shortages, no way to move from one area to another, no access to a capital city, no easy access to education or medical care, no civil service salaries, the people will die, the nation will die without a single gas chamber. Or so the Israelis hope."

The role of the Israel lobby in American politics is becoming more and more controversial as former President Jimmy Carter recently released a book entitled "Palestine: Peace not Apartheid." The issue will not go away until there is justice in the region. It's time to get serious about countering the militant Zionist lobby in America and worldwide, and the Council for the National Interest has just released a full page advertisement in the New York Times on the subject of the wall and the fact that it has cut off the road between Bethlehem and Jerusalem. Get involved at www.cnionline.org . A reproduction of the advertisement is here:

http://www.cnionline.org/nyt5.pdf

A brilliant cartoon on the subject can be viewed here:

http://www.cnionline.org/nyt5.pdf

The Christison's article is available at http://www.counterpunch.org/christison11272006.html

Two great researchers

The Christisons are two of the most important Palestine/Israel researchers, and now they are coming out of the closet regarding 911. That is precisely when they dissappeared from the pages of CounterPunch, another largely Left gatekeeper publication (regarding certain issues, including 911; the Hoaxacough, and other untouchables). Counterpunch did publish one of Bill's great essays though on the history of the Israel Lobby, not long ago.

Bill Christison, is a former

Bill Christison, is a former senior official of the CIA (which means that his essay was probably vetted by the CIA). Now Christison wants to give three cheers to "Webster Tarpley and other mistakenly labeled conspiracists." But wait a minute, if 9/11 was a domestic covert operation as most alternative theories imply, why is a former senior official from the agency that specializes in covert operations telling us to take those theories seriously? Has the leadership at the CIA seen the light? Should we expect to see new whistleblowers turning up in the CIA, and maybe even some indictments of insiders, given the newfound acceptance of 9/11 Truth in official circles?
http://911review.com/reviews/dissidentvoice/markup/christison14.htm

And a post on 'Patriots Question 9/11' -

The "Patriots and 9/11" Trap
by repost Friday December 15, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Morgan Reynolds and David Shayler are "former" government officials who say they believe that real planes didn't hit the WTC towers on 9/11 -- need we say anymore? People have tried to email the webmaster of the web site who promotes these people as "Patriots Question 9/11," to no avail. But how hard is this situation to figure out? Not all who describe themselves as "patriots" are really the type of patriots we think they are. The push by some in the 9/11 truth movement to spread the word via "celebs" has only been shown to tank credibility -- celebs and big names all too often function as bait for the explicit promotion of "no planes" theories. The main tool of mainstream media to trash us is "Those conspiracy nuts think a real plane didn't hit the Pentagon!" It's pretty basic -- the evidence isn't there one way or another and using "celebs" and "former" officials to push that they know a plane didn't hit only makes us all look nuts and the so-called "evidence" easily disproven in debates and articles.
http://arizona.indymedia.org/news/2006/12/53388.php

Great Article

This is the way to do it. This article nailed it. Maybe someone should email this to Chomsky to see what he has to say ;-)