ANY evidence for those assertions? Did you examine the evidence presented? Do you have an alternative theory which accounts for all of the observed phenomena?

 “The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain”

 “The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth”

"The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass, unlike that of WTC7"

The buildings were PULVERIZED (reduced to dust or powder).

 “Curiouser and curiouser”, cried Alice.

 And for anyone NOT familiar with the brutal execution/murder of her assistant please see Justice for Michael Zebuhr

Where are these quotes (“The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain” “The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth” "The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass, unlike that of WTC7") from?

I'm operating under the assumption that the pulverization could have been caused by lots of explosives, but thoroughly not by gravity, AND THAT'S ALL WE NEED TO SHOW TO GET THIS OPENED UP FOR AN INVESTIGATION where it can be examined properly, with subpoena power.

That's right, John-- we're getting to that stage, of examining the allegations scientifically. But you know, on 9/11 itself, a lot of people were looking at what was going on and saying, "this doesn't add up." Same thing here. But again, until the use of explosives inside the buildings has been ruled out, WHICH IT HASN'T, I suggest this matter be given EXTREMELY low priority.

I can't shake the feeling that the no planes/space beam disinfo team had something to do with Michael's death.

First of all, you are a no-planes/space beam disinfo spammer and if you think you're fooling anyone, forget about it. No truth activist has the kind of time you obviously do to spam these boards with such highly formatted crap. 

I didn't accuse Wood of murder.

I DO think that the murder is connected to the disinfo team that is responsible for spreading the noplanes/spacebeam bullshit.

Got a problem with that? Too bad.

Andrew, I agree with you 100% about the outrage to common decency (to say nothing about the violation of 911 Blogger rules & policies) that such vicious personal attacks represent.

However, the moderators of 911 Blogger appear to only selectively enforce their own policies & rules.  My complaints about such personal attacks directly to dz have yielded NO real results.  His only response (coincidental, of course) was to begin to pre-censor the blogs of those who were being personally attacked -- along with ALL other 911 Blogger bloggers, of course. 

Censoring & delaying the blogs (even for established 911 Blogger bloggers) only increased the anger & personal attacks against those who supposedly caused the new 911 Blogger delay & censor policies,  Truth delayed is truth denied.

In addition, complaining about such personal attacks and other rule & policy violations would be a full time job (and I already have a couple of those)..

Although I OFTEN disagree with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds (and almost everyone else, including myself), I know how sensitive that Wood is about Michael Zebuhr's murder (which IS arguably 9/11-related -- see www.MichaelZebuhr.blogspot.com).  Therefore, I replied to YT -- and also addressed the larger fear-and-confusion questions about "What, Me Worry?".

If the 911 Blogger moderators don't begin to truly moderate such unfortunate, counterproductive, unfounded, insidious & vicious personal attacks, then we ALL may soon be eyewitnesses to an impending irrelevancy & marginalization of 911 Blogger.

Now, we can probably expect that the negative ratings will pile up on our respective comments -- by the same people who engage in these vicioius, unfounded personal attacks (or by the moderators themselves). 

All that it takes to auto-hide the text of our coments is for three (3) witting or witless auto-hide cover-uppers to negatively rate our comments. 

9/11 Blogger gets thousdands and thousands of visitors per day.  This makes it easy for the 9/11 Cover-Up & PsyOp Perps to retard possible 9/11 truths, to subtly get all 911 Blogger readers seeing only what they want, and to sew a Divide & Conquer mentality here at 911 Blogger. 

One would expect for the 911 Blogger moderators to know better.  Go figure!

My first hit piece, YaY!

http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1133&postdays=0&postor...

The reason I think the no-planers are on to something is that the video showing the plane slipping into the South Tower depicts something that is physically impossible. There should have been much more deceleration and debris, and the fuel in the wings most likely would have exploded outside the building.

In e-mails, DZ & Co. have been made very aware that a number of their ‘major bloggers’ are nothing more than Trolls - who splatter unsupported assertions around, with liberal doses of pure ad hominems.

there are a lot of people that do these things.. on all sorts of sides..

They have been requested to ‘do something about it’. Yet they have failed to take any seriously active steps.

what would you like me to do? i thought i was already too 'draconian'? would you like me to remove those that you don't like, or would these rules apply across all users? your statement of 'trolls - who splatter unsupported assertions around with liberal doses of pure ad hominems' could be said about a number of users, not just the ones whom you dislike. take a look at the community blog entry rankings, would some of those at the bottom be trolls too, or only those which you think are?

So whatchagonnado DZ?

1) Delete this comment?
nope, comment moderation is now off my plate and into the hands of the community.

2) Ban me?
nope. (to clarify Nico isn't banned and hasn't been for some time)

3) Clean up your 911Blogger.com of Trolls who do nothing than post unsupported assertions & ad hominems?
so now you would advocate banning users? i thought i was wrong for doing this in the past? should i go back and do this retro-actively too? your definition of 'troll' and 'unsupported assertions' is open to personal perspective wouldn't you say? should i moderate from my perspective only and be the 'draconian' fox news pundit you want to paint me as, or should i not moderate so that you can then complain that i'm not?

Is that what you wanted DZ? By ignoring the e-mails, it’s what you asked for.
i'm not sorry for not responding to the emails copied to ~12 other people making invalid assertions and assumptions about me and/or this site. i respond to people who really want a response, not to witch hunts or veiled threats.

Your call, DZ & Co.
i've been open enough in my blog entries that my intention is to put any and all moderation into the hands of the community as a whole, and that is my 'call'. in fact that is what i have been working on from 6PM until 2AM (just to get up at 7AM for my REAL job).. i'm sure once that is in place you'll take issue with it as well.

the reality is that there is no form of moderation that would make everyone here happy. at least most can deal with what the site is, and realize that there are other sites out there, and that they are free to start their own even. also most can understand that things don't happen overnight, and that when i say i'm working on something then it's going to come 2nd to my real job, and its going to fit in with other priorities i have aside from trying to be put into the position of a babysitter for some here.

so.. to summarize..

1) we should have real time posting of comments/blogs ('Truth delayed is truth denied')
2) a team member should be around to moderate everything perfectly according to each person's perspective of 'troll' and 'unsupported assertions' 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
3) don't moderate against stuff that you might agree with because that would be 'draconian'
4) moderate against anything you might disagree with otherwise we are facilitating shouting matches
5) ban users who are 'trolls' and post 'unsupported assertions', but not the ones i like who might be accused of the same thing

have you ever considered what it takes for 24/7 real time moderation? do you want to fund 3 people to work 8 hour shifts?

i've said i'm working on a new system, to get myself out of this desired role of perfect 24/7 moderator. i can't wait to roll it out. i'm sure it won't stop the complaints from some, but then again those same people usually have no constructive suggestions, just a predilection for complaining, and playing the victim while attacking others - all while failing to do anything constructive for which they could be open for criticism themselves.

there ya go, you got a response, hope it makes you feel all warm and mushy inside!

if you want to reply, why not explain the most feasible end all solution to proper community moderation? i've come up with my solution which i am working on, lets hear yours.

I am angry because that disgusting assertion about Zebuhr's murder is still fouling this page.

And you're somehow not angry about the disgusting assertion by Wood and her cohorts that "Space Beams" killed thousands of innocent people on 9/11?

Hypocrite!

How is it less disgusting to assert that thousands of innocent people were killed by explosives?

Because I fucking posted it there! Cool how that works, huh?

It's my statement of my personal feeling on the matter and like I told the other guy - if you don't like it, TOO FUCKING BAD.

Have you read this? Pretty interesting :

The bizarre case of Michael Zebuhr

6 year coma?!  Interesting...

That Judy Jetson was not in a coma for those six years. More likely a good excuse for disappearing for a while to do some whacked out covert work. What hospital did she spend the coma in? Anyone know?

As for Zebuhr he may have been killed because he knew something, or he may be another case of "deathus fakedensis", currently reaching epidemic proportions in some circles...

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

Waking up from a 6 year coma and then pursue a career as an engineering professor is rare indeed.  Even rarer not to become a vegetable or other serious neurological problems.

Do I doubt it? That lends to belief and on serious issues like this, belief is not enough.  But the occurance of waking up from such a long coma is certainly news worthy on a local level at least.  I can't find any mention of this at all. (blogs don't count).

When did she wake up?   

I'll check it out, thanks stallion.

Let's just say I have a totally different take on it than you do (are you really DBS btw?) I see you posting the highly suspicious details of the events leading up to and following Michael's murder but then you start mixing in all kinds of completely unfounded stuff. I am certainly not going to sit here and pick it apart but I see that you equate Alex Jones with white supremacist groups and out of the blue accuse Steven Jones of luring in students to murder (lol - so bad)... this just isn't gonna work for me, DBS.

On the other hand I would support an investigation into Reynolds, Wood and Mattingly. 

had to register to get all of the comments on Judy Wood...

 Hard to understand at times, and is kinda boring. Definetely get the hw solutions to follow so you can become professient and make sure your doing it right. Hw assignments are a pain in the ass. Due every class, and graded on correctness (get the solutions!). Tests aren't too bad though and grading is reasonable.

Does not need to be teaching.

She is an odd lady, to say the least. She is very good at what she does, but she can't always explain it well enough for students to understand. SHE TAKES FOR EVER TO GIVE EXAMS BACK!!!!! It took here 3 weeks to give an exam back once.

Like others said, she had good intentions and when she wasn't trying to convince us Bush blew up the WTC she was actually nice, but she wasn't a great teacher. Too many times she starts examples and doesn't finish them. And yes, she was in a coma for 6 years. How crazy is that.

She woke up from a coma and decided her calling was to become a professor. She did not really seem to know the material, and she was hopeless at trying to convey it to the student. She fails to be able to complete a thought if not a sentance. If it is possible at all, aviod her.

uh she was real easy on some tests, and horrible on others, i took one test before i even got the previous one back

Dr. Wood has good intentions, but she is not wound too tight. Not a good teacher if you are looking for orgainization and structure. She gives lots of real world examples and tries to illustrate topics more than most teachers. However, this will not help you are her tests. They are difficult.

ok um... what's a good word that will describe her... She um.... SUCKS!!!! SHE IS SO HORRIBLE! WOW! I MEAN I WAS LIKE WOW, WHY ARE YOU STILL TEACHING?

VERY VERY VERY unorganized and unprofessional. Avoid her at all cost. I did not belive a professor could be this bad until I had her. She gave my first exam back three and a half weeks afte I took it. She expected homework to be turned in at the beginning of class yet she was always late. Always!!

Very bad teacher, never organized, can't understand a question and if she can, refuses to answer it. Need a microscope to read the board. Looks to take off points rather than to give you points. Refuses to answer her door when you knock on it. I want my money back for the lack of teaching.

what they said... dont take her and if you must, go to SI

She is unwilling to help you understand the material in class. She is not an effective teacher. I depended on my book to pass the class. I do not suggest her for anyone! She ridicules students in class when they ask questions.

oh wow...she is a terrible teacher. she writes SO small on the board and talks straight into so the class has no idea what is going on. Don't dare ask a question in class because she will laugh in your face. The only way i passed her class was for my SI leader. I do not recommend her at all.

Talk of groundless smear campaigns. That guy has labelled almost everyone in the Truth Movement as disinfo, including some excellent and respected colleagues.

Yes, I 'm posting again. To that extent only am I a 'hypocrite'.

That shit is out of control.

simple, practical methods with laser beams & holograms! They are doing more harm than good to the truth movement.

I just took the links to Fetzer related material off of my website.