Seriously anyone that hasn't gotten that 9/11 was a clear inside job by now, ESPECIALLY those who are into politics and are suposed to be educated, is an IDIOT, I don't care anymore!
I was for Bush and for the war and I looked at the evidence CRITICALLY and with an open mind even though it ENRAGED me and destroyed my belief system.
OK, maybe not an IDIOT...but you certainly aren't able to analyze data and put two and two together.
Bill Maher either knows and he's paid off or he just isn't as bright as he may seem. I'm leaning towards the latter.

Bill Maher is irrelevent, the idea he put forward to possibly millions of americans is.

 See my post above.

 The dog did not bark, and everyone knows this.  Bill Maher is a pompous ass, but the point he brings to the table is still damning, and to the benefit of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

That' correct, the dog did not bark and it appears that the public whether they want to or not, are coming to the truth about 9/11 and the sewerage is going to flow everywhere for the stench to permeate even the hardest of the die hard Bushites. Anyone who brings national attention to this matter is a big plus for the nation and regaining our freedoms that are being disolved as we speak. We need a complete overhaul and may it happen soon!

Six weeks ago it hadn't occurred to me that 9/11 was other than two Muslim-hijacked planes slamming into the Twin Towers and bringing them down, in the process murdering 3000 innocent people, mainly Americans. Then late one night, the documentary "Loose Change" was shown, on a history channel here in Sydney which is, ironically, operated by Rupert Murdoch. I couldn't believe what I saw! But, blow by blow, the film proved to me that 9/11 could only have been a controlled demolition job, which could only have been done with the knowledge and/or connivance of Bush and co themselves. I started to talk to my friends about it and most of them didn't believe me, most knee-jerking "Conspiracy theory!" And now the only thing I find hard to believe is that most people _still_ talk as though 9/11 was 19 Muslims killing 3000 Americans! And a whole lot of these people _will_ not look at the very video evidence disproving this. It’s been filmed, it’s on video, for heavens sake! In a normal court case, if you can produce a video recording of the crime being tried, the court case will be over in 20 minutes! These people simply will not. We are the "conspiracy theorists" and that is the end of the matter. These people are no ordinary idiots, as you suggest - they are bloody-minded. Their game is not the truth, their game is to support Bush, or the GOP, or right-wing politics, or war-mongering, or Israel, right or wrong, or religious fundamentalism, or anti-liberalism, or anti-gay rights, or anti-pro choice, or some other either/or lunacy, using the truth if it suits them or otherwise using half-truths and even outright lies. This is what any propaganda machine does, and the people thus brainwashed do not even suspect that they are being used. But remember how we used to argue like that ourselves in college, foam at the mouth, cherry-picking only the facts that supported us (and our paroxysms making us feel good)? Perhaps it's the mark of a grown-up person to have risen above any partisanism, and to have become more open and impartial. At first I was a bit scared too to loudly proclaim that 9/11 could only have been an inside job. But then I found all the other courageous individuals, mainly on the Internet, who, in spite of your new pro-torture, anti-_habeas corpus_ laws, do loudly proclaim just that, that this administration is the most spectacularly corrupt the world has ever seen (spectacular because it’s so blatant). Australia is not as bad; it doesn't have the same “homeland security” laws as you do in America. But, brown-nosing to the last, prime minister John Howard managed to sneak in a few nice little laws of his own late one night, one of which makes calling him an idiot a _seditious_ act. (But you _are_ an idiot, John, don't you want to know the truth?) We know that politicians on the world stage don't have any shame. John Howard will therefore not lose any sleep over a) the fact that he has been made a complete fool of by his “friend” George Bush, and b) has supported the whole criminal episode that is Iraq, where the "coalition of the willing" is using depleted uranium to add to the untold suffering they are causing. And at the start of all this is the inside job of 9/11.

Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
Sydney, Australia

did we not find out about this way back when "Fahrenheit 911" came out? That was Michael Moore. Bill Maher is coming forth with some kind of 911 revelation here? NOT. Okay, good for him, he is saying SOMETHING now. But he is way late in his criticism of the President. Very late indeed. That is not an ad hominen attack. That is just the plain truth. He waited until it became "popular" to criticize the President. And now, 3 years into the Iraq War, he's suddenly having all these articles critical of the President and his policies published in Huffington Post. I AM glad for whatever positive attention 911 truth can get on mainstream media. But Maher still makes me ill cuz he's just SUCH a wuss. :p

Okay, that was an ad hominem attack. Sorry. I'm only human and the guy makes me sick.

Hear, hear...this is but a snowflake on the tip of the iceberg!

But still impeachable and if this is how the real investigation is going to begin, then let's go for it. (Same guy)

There was definatly a threat to his life.....

"Angel is next" was phoned into the Secret Service, and Angel is a code name for AF1.

This has been confirmed by several sources and even Condi stated that was true on a Fox interview shortly after 9/11.

This is strong evidence to 9/11 being an inside job, and that Bush was probably told to go along or he would end up like JFK.

thats right, angel is next as well. but i still dont know where Tarpley got that from, interesting as it sounds.

There are several reports.... Here is one....

"They also feared that Air Force One itself was a target. Cheney told the president there was a credible threat against the plane. Using the code name for Air Force One, Mr. Bush told an aide, “Angel is next.” The threat was passed to presidential pilot Col. Mark Tillman."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/11/60II/main521718.shtml

Does anyone know if the "angel is next" comment was investigated by they 911 commission?

I think it is evidence that someone who knew the code for air force one (likely in the gov't) was behind the threat to AF1.

------------------

All aspects of the truth are consistent

Yes it was, but they said that it was a farce! Yet in the article I provided, Bush himself is saying that AF1 was threatened from a credible source.

It's a CYA in process..... If they did not say there was no such thing, then this would surely indicate that it was an inside job. By trying to kill it in the commission report, they can attempt to discredit the story.

However, they are forgetting that the story has come from the President!

http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing12/9-11Commission_Hearing_2...

Now, I want to turn to one other area where there has been some misconception. And perhaps I can start with Admiral Leidig. In this regard, you were a participant on the Air Threat Conference Call.

ADM. LEIDIG: Yes, sir.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: And do you recall at some point -- we have it at 10:37 -- that the vice president of the United States reported on that call that there was an anonymous threat against Air Force One, using the then-code name Angel, that it was to be the next target? Do you recall that, sir?

ADM. LEIDIG: Sir, I think that occurred right after I was relieved on the watch by General Winfield. Right after we resolved what was going on with United 93, around that time General Winfield took over. So I'm familiar because I've looked at the transcript, but I wasn't on the conference at that time.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Now, let me ask General Eberhart and General Arnold whether that information was communicated to you in any real- time basis.

GEN. EBERHART: No, sir, not to me.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: The information, according to the staff, that that was another phantom report, that there was no anonymous call, there was no use of the code name Angel for Air Force One or a statement that Air Force One was to be next, and yet that mythology was perpetuated for some weeks, if not months, thereafter. And as we know, those things, it's hard for them to go away.

So to the best of your knowledge here, do you have any information which would suggest that there was a threat received on September 11th against Air Force One?

GEN. EBERHART: I was not aware of it that day nor this day, Mr. Commissioner.

MR. ARNOLD: Nor was I.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

im not positive, but wasnt it the same "team" or faction that took out Ahmed Massoud, head of the Northern Alliance? he was killed on Sept.9,2001. gee, i wonder who made that happen? anyway, what i remember reading is that he was taken out by people posing as journalists, and that Bush's secret service detail on 9/11 was approached outside of where he was that morning by "journalists" who said they had set up an interview, but the secret service turned them away. i forget where i read that though.

Many things point to the theory that Cheney (who else) played a game with Bush on 9/11 and behind the smokescreen of the "attacks" Cheney grabbed all presidential powers. Maybe Bush was wondering in the classroom what trick they were playing on him - his face fits that of someone that did expect "something" but is wondering why something else happened. These people rule by intimidation - Cheney dug up dirt about Bush, and so he became his new puppetmaster. (Latest from waynemadsenreport.com is that John McCain is similarly being intimidated by Bushco.)

John McCain, who i have never trusted, has been especially disgusting lately. hes such a goddamn coward. yes, Bush is happy and content not rocking the boat while Cheney does what he does.

It seemed eerily similar to the assassination attempt on Reagan in 1981...

If Reagan had been killed then Bush Sr. could have been President for 11 years....

Not sure if Cheney could have pulled that one off.

Both may have been an intimidation tactic..... Guessing Bush Sr. knew about both attempts.... how sick is that..

What is Georgies "Boner" nickname?..... the temporary?

oh i go a step further on that one. remember, George H.W. Bush is an ex CIA honcho. he wasnt just a field operative. he more than knew about the Reagan attempt in my opinion, not to mention few other high profile killings........

But to go as far as to put a hit on your own son..... he wanted this one bad!

that was evil enough to clear him of any accusation.... would have also given them more of an excuse to amp up the theiving of our rights

as well as additional excuses for complete failure of our defense systems.... lost in the chaos of it all.

Yet this allows me to give Bush slack for sitting in that classroom in utter shock...wondering what he should do at that point.... would they make another attempt on him when he left the school?

He had to be thinking he was as safe in that school as anywhere else

haha, i wasnt implying that he was behind that, i was saying he was behind the Reagan attempt. but i sure as hell wouldnt put it past the old spook.