hey everyone... i just posted a little thing on the impact times and seismic spikes... pretty interesting argument, i didn't come up with the idea, so i'm interested in what everyone thinks of it.

http://www.flatplanet.net/truth911/impacttimes1.html

i also wrote a summary for my site, any comments? i've got room for about 1 more line, so not much room to add without taking away... enjoy people.

-adam
http://www.truth911.net

thanks guys for putting it up.

Hey, I just thought of an argument that goes along with the Washington Post story to use:

Bring up the Washington post story with a skeptic who thinks that if it was a conspiracy it would have come out by now, and say this:

Now do you understand why the argument that "well, if it was a conspiracy we would have heard it by now" holds no water?

You have members of the 9/11 commission, who are just looking into what happened (this is taking for granted it was not a coverup job, which it was, but lets give them the benefit of the doubt for now) and covered up for 2 years that they felt they were deliberately and possibly criminally lied to by the pentagon. Now, the 9/11 commission wasn't just the commissioners themselves, but 80+ staff members that worked on it as well. So you have a huge story about the biggest crime in history, and the fact that the pentagon lied to investigators, and this lie lasted for 2 years before being exposed by The Washington Post. And not only the 80 staff members, you also have all of the Pentagon staff people who were contacted by the 9/11 commission during the course of the investigation, at least in the dozens. So we now have well over a hundred people covering up a huge story about 9/11 for 2 years.

You don't think that the actual perpetrators of the mass murder of almost 3,000 people couldn't keep a secret for 5 years, even if it was well over a hundred people that were part of the conspiracy?

Micahyah, I like your argument.

these are definitely cracks in the dam----

I just listened to Randi's entire show. There was a caller at the end who said he was an ATC, and he knew the procedures for when something like that happens. He claims that from inside sources, he knows that the tapes that were destroyed had to do with the initial time the "hijackings" started. When everybody's hair was on fire. He said the people he talked to said, and he put emphasis on this, "We were doing our job."

I took that to mean somebody wasn't doing their jobs... perhaps NORAD?

Randi gave a tremendous discussion today. It was really just incredible to hear it.

I didn't get to listen to the whole show, but it did sound like Randi was on a roll and continuing on about Norad way after finishing with Paul Thompson! She started Thompson at two and a half hours in, so probably check the whole show from that point on.

Malloy said he'll have Webster Tarpley on tomorrow/Thursday night.

I'm trying to listen to your link to the Randy Rhodes interview with Paul Thompson. It stopped a few times----at 3 minutes & 28 seconds and at 9 minutes and 15 seconds, not to buffer or anything. It just stops and goes back to the beginning. It doesn't start up again, it just says Stopped. I hate when that happens. I want it to play straight through.

Carol FYI, here's another link to the show I found, thanks to Yarrow Mahko:

randi rhodes' show today uploaded to 911blogger's ftp and available from yousendit here: