Conspiracy? What is the truth about 9/11? By Gary Dickson -- Lake County Record Bee

Conspiracy? What is the truth about 9/11?

By Gary Dickson -- Record-Bee columnist
Lake County Record Bee Lakeport CA
Posted: 01/16/2009

Conspiracy? What is the truth about 9/11?

Almost before the smoke had cleared from the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and from within the cavity at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, conspiracy theories began to appear. There were so many and they emerged so quickly that President Bush addressed the matter on November 10, 2001, in a speech to the United Nations. The President condemned the introduction of "outrageous conspiracy theories ... that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty."

Bush's comments failed to stop citizens from issuing their own 9/11 theories and his appeal didn't suppress the audacity of claims made by some conspiracy theorists. Today, there are millions of pages, on the web and in print, which offer wide ranging explanations of what happened on 9/11. This led Time Magazine to print, "This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality." On September 11, 2006, a large group of protestors assembled at Ground Zero wearing "Investigate 9/11" t-shirts. In 2008, 9/11 conspiracy theories topped a "greatest conspiracy theory" list compiled by The Daily Telegraph, Great Britain's best selling newspaper.

I recently watched "Loose Change" on PBS. I had not previously heard about this documentary and I found myself mesmerized by the pace that it leads viewers through explanations concerning dozens of questions that have arisen surrounding the events of 9/11. And, "Loose Change"

likely makes the most audacious claim of all the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Viewers are bluntly told that the attacks on September 11, 2001 were orchestrated by the United States government. Wow! That's a hard pill to swallow. Yet, many people still believe the CIA assassinated President Kennedy and the Moon landings were faked in a NASA studio.

One of the most interesting elements surrounding "Loose Change" is that its writer and filmmaker, Dylan Avery, did not plan to make a documentary about 9/11. In 2002, while hoping to be admitted to film school, he set out to write a script and make a film about a fictitious World Trade Center-type of assault, with a twist. The attack would not be what it seemed. Instead of an act of terrorism, his storyline was going to feature government insiders who planned and carried out the attack for their own evil purposes. The deeper he dug into 9/11, for background information, the more he became convinced that the 9/11 attacks, in reality, were just like the fictitious story he was creating.

Since 2002, Avery has produced three versions of "Loose Change". Naturally, he has received criticism from numerous individuals and organizations. His first two versions were produced on a shoestring budget. The last one, "Loose Change Final Cut", had $200,000 of financial backing. With each new edition, Avery strengthened the information on some theories and abandoned suppositions that had been disproved by facts or scientific argument. Although this young man has incurred the wrath of many, he has also been applauded for his diligent efforts to make his documentary as factual as he can possibly make it.

To most Americans, the idea that our own government would carry out such an evil act on its own people is beyond the realm of acceptability. Be that as it may, Dylan Avery's fearless work has caused many skeptics to think twice. But, political activist George Monbiot says that if it were true, Dylan Avery would have already disappeared, like Jimmy Hoffa. But, I don't believe that. If the government did make 9/11 happen, the one thing that would cause widespread suspicion now would be the death or disappearance of Dylan Avery.

Everyone has a right to think what they wish concerning the historic and tragic events of 9/11, but I believe everyone should at least view "Loose Change" and consider the information that Avery presents. In the seven-plus years since 9/11 many puzzling issues concerning that horrific September day have become issues of debate.

Note: If you can't catch the documentary on PBS, you can view it on your computer at YouTube.com, or purchase a copy from a variety of outlets.

Gary Dickson is Record-Bee publisher. He may be reached at 263-5636 ext. 24 or by email at gdickson@record-bee.com

Article Indicates LC2E Showed on PBS

"I recently watched "Loose Change" on PBS"

"Note: If you can't catch the documentary on PBS, you can view it on your computer at YouTube.com, or purchase a copy from a variety of outlets"

Do you think with the Bush Administration's exit we will see more of this???

More attention to finding the truth needed!

I can't believe with all the questions looming over this event that no mainstream media will touch the subject of renewing an investigation of the events of September 11, 2001. Where is all the talk of thermate in the dust of WTC? If there is nothing to hide then why not release the videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon? How are all four black boxes missing from all the suspected aircraft? How do you explain Norman Minneta's testimony before the congress? How could anything hit one of the most protected buildings in the world? I could go on but I know I am just preaching to the choir on this site! I am just frustrated and am waiting for the time for "truth" to break through all the lies.

MarvinRayBurt

Yes, and the "Conspiracy Theories" exist because

they won't answer very basic questions. The conspiracy theories were not brought about by us, but by them. Remember that!

The Facts Behind NORAD Proves 9/11 Was An Inside Job

One of the basic questions the government still won't answer is why they continue lying about NORAD on 9/11. Here is the latest from NORAD concerning the organization's monitoring capabilities on 9/11, "Since the tragic events of 9/11, NORAD’s role – which previously was outward-looking – now includes monitoring airspace within North America." -- http://www.norad.mil/50/nutshell.html

What did NORAD say before 9/11 concerning its monitoring capabilities over American skies? "The Air Operations Center (AOC) maintains constant surveillance of North American airspace to prevent overflight by hostile aircraft. It tracks over 2.5 million aircraft annually." -- http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usspc-fs/cmoctrivia.htm

When it comes to NORAD, the official 9/11 narrative fell apart when the first article on NORAD was posted on June 4, 2008 at www.DNotice.org. To date, five articles on NORAD can be read at DNotice.org.

That NORAD did monitor American skies on 9/11 is an historical fact, not a hypothesis to be further investigated. The NORAD angle of 9/11 proves that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job.

Dean Jackson/webmaster DNotice.org
Washington, DC

Come to our DC 911 Truth meetings

Hi Dean, since you are in DC, you should come and meet us. We get together twice a month in downtown DC or Bethesda. Full info at:

http://www.dc911truth.org/

Making time

Hey Sheila,

I've been meaning to. I will have to make time!

Dean Jackson/webmaster DNotice.org
Washington, DC

Void

Void

Sheila -

Many thanks to you and dc911truth.org for the excellent "Obama flyer"!

I passed out about 80 yesterday and it is now a permanent fixture in my literature kit, which I never leave home without.

Thanks again!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

MarvinRayBurt -

I think you mean Sec. Mineta's testimony before the 9/11 Commission televised on CSPAN, not Congress, yes?

The msm are controlled and, as I've said many times, when we see 9/11 truth on the evening news our work will be done, assuming it isn't a limited hangout (I think they're getting ready to frame Pakistan, btw).

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

"Wow! That's a hard pill to swallow. "

Welcome to the matrix Gary! If the truth can't set us free, I don't think anything can. The truth is spreading folks let' s keep the ball rolling.

This paper stepped out on a

This paper stepped out on a limb. Other than sending a number of people their way, which I think we will do anyway, how do you think we can help them? Some of the small newspapers are going to survive the economic collapse. What should they do to maximize their chance of being one of them?

Dickson is really taking a hit in the comments section

With lines like:

"Why am I wondering how many of these posts will be read at upcoming sanity hearings and court cases where the criminally insane are prosecuted?"

And this is his newspaper. We can help by posting supportive comments at his site. Let him know we appreciate his courage.

Loose Change appeared on PBS?

Really? and that wasn't posted all over the blogs? I watch the Public Begging Station often and never seen any hint of Loose Change appearing on it, (not that that really means much) unless it was a local programming station event. Maybe he's a closet truther and wanted to surreptitiously get the word out without too much flack at the office. I believe if Final Cut actually aired on PBS, 9/11 truth would be all over the MSM and we'd be on our way to a new investigation. That is if they could actually cover it for more than two minutes objectively without a pair of mindless talking heads.

Peace all

DTG

Like the PNAC document said, "change will be slow absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, such as a new Pearl Harbor" That is a very true statement. It was the catalyst for change towards imperialism. Now let it be the catalyst for change towards a new and truly free nation.

Discrediting by Association

What is this (paragraph 4)? "Yet, many people still believe the CIA assassinated President Kennedy and the Moon landings were faked in a NASA studio".
Yes. Knowing that the CIA killed JFK = believing that the Moon landings were faked...
We take it once more: "Yet, many people still believe the CIA assassinated President Kennedy".
By teaspoons: "Yet" – "still believe"
Yet –  still believe… In spite of what? In spite of (see preceding paragraph): "audacious claim" – "bluntly told" – "hard pill to swallow".
As Bush said, in spite of being sooo outrageaous...

Still believe… Believe or know?

What is the point of posting this average piece of propaganda?

Millions have watched Loose Change, by now. It is viewed and announced as an "entertaining documentary" by the second biggest TV station in my country. Wake up friends! It is considered not dangerous, fit for viewing. Perhaps it helped some people to believe, but not to know, because it is full of bogus information
(http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/index.html).
I recently tried to see Loose change 2 once more, and got sick of the many false claims and bogus evidence. It is too loose to change anything. George Monbiot was enforced by Loose change 2 to disbelieve the "conspiracy theorists", like a medicine that is not strong enough will help the resistance against the "conspircy virus" (Monbiot's phrasing) to get stronger, not weaker, the denial gets stronger, not weaker by all these false claims mixed with valid ones. (Final Cut is much better, but the brand "Loose Change" is unfortunately discredited anyway.)

It is not a matter of believing but a matter of knowing.
(http://druckversion.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Contentment%20and%20Denia...).

And once more: The classical conspiracy theory is the official one, just like the Reichtags fire, the Gleiwitz sender, the czarist intelligence produced conspiracy flick about Zion the elder which is of the same kind as the bushist intelligence produced conspiracy flick about fatty bin Laden "confessions" (http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html), the Stalin produced "TROTSKYITE-ZINOVIEVITE TERRORIST CENTRE" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Trials).

How long are we going to relate to this kind of muddling the waters?