"...it is quite a change to see 9/11 skeptics being given some form of recognition..."

Not a change at all. You've always been given recognition.

It seems like '06 has been quite a year for the truth movement. Do you all agree?

Jon...

The cat in the background was some nice comic relief, especially when you 'shushed' him. (:

"Why do you constantly check this site if you think the truth movement is bogus?"

There is nothing bogus about reality. You exist, don't you?

What is Bush paying you 911Poller?

"What is Bush paying you 911Poller?"

Are you speechless,anonymous?

There is nothing bogus about reality. You exist, don't you?
911Poller | 06.05.06 - 10:09 pm | #

________________________________________________________________________________
Nice none answer poller you have a gift thats for sure.

"Nice none answer poller you have a gift thats for sure."

Certainly appropriate for a non-question.

....In what way, in your opinion?

The new zogby poll, MSM coverage of the inconclusive new pentagon video, MSM coverage of 9/11 Chicago Truth conference, LC2E devouring the web, and generally from what I myself have observed, many more people opening their eyes to the disturbing probable reality.

And about why you come here...I guess I was wondering why a skeptic such as yourself spends so much time on this site. Just curious. Are you trying to gain info to fight the truthers? If so, I can't imagine what you've found here that would help your debunking efforts.

9/11 Action Alert!!!

"There is disagreement here about the NYT's article's "recognition." I've already stated that the last two paragraphs say it all.

Now how would you interpret it?"

Actually, the disagreement has to do with your first statement, "You've always been given recognition."

Please name for me the first time, and in what newspaper the phrase, "9/11 Truth Movement" appeared.

I KNEW IT! I knew Olbermann would turn tail and defame the 9/11 truth movement as bogus. Too good to be true. No, it was merely "incompetence" in a "pre 9/11 mindset". Riiight. If only FBI Agent John O'neil was alive.

When the money trail behind 9/11 is finally revealed, it's going to point to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan government, and most importantly the United states.

As far as 911poller, maybe be is a 9/11 Truther simply wanting to seperate fact from fiction and just has an odd way of showing it? He only seems to argue the controlled demolition theory, so maybe he knows the rest is possible.

"It seems like '06 has been quite a year for the truth movement. Do you all agree?

Jon...

The cat in the background was some nice comic relief, especially when you 'shushed' him. (:"

He's a she... Quite a year my friend, but not good enough. ;)

This will make you all feel better:

45% doubt 9/11 story

While political leaders in Washington desperately try to convince Americans that the major threats to the country are gay people having weddings, Mexicans picking lettuce and the off chance that somebody might one day burn a U.S. flag, the American people seem to have more serious concerns in mind.

A solid 45% of people polled by Zogby International now agree that "Congress or an international tribunal should re-investigate the 9/11 attacks, including whether any U.S. government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success."

In other words, nearly half the country suspects there are U.S. government officials who permitted or even helped plan the horrific mass murder of September 11, 2001.

The credibility of Washington leaders is now so critically eroded that one of every two Americans would now support an international tribunal investigating the actions of the U.S. government.

The survey results, released May 23 by Zogby, also show 42% of Americans believe the official 9/11 Commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence."

It's a far cry from the near-unanimous support the White House, Congress and the Pentagon earned from the shocking horror of the 9/11 attacks nearly five years ago.

A growing "9/11 truth movement" is gathering converts at a furious clip, even filling convention centers with people from all walks of American life who can no longer accept the dubious "official narrative" told by the U.S. corporate media in the immediate aftermath of the made-for-TV slaughter of innocents.

In Chicago this weekend, some 500 skeptics of the "Islamic radical terrorist" story met at the first International Education and Strategy Conference for 9/11 Truth, according to the New York Times.

Official media such as the New York Times still presents the skeptics as oddballs obsessed with minutiae such as the melting point of steel in the World Trade Center towers or dubious claims that Flight 77 didn't actually strike the Pentagon.

Meanwhile, uncontested evidence pointing to staggering levels of government complicity -- such as shamed CIA chief Porter Goss' breakfast with Mohammad Atta's financier on the very morning of the attacks or the Pentagon intelligence program that actually identified several of the hijackers a year before the hijackings -- continues to be ignored by the mainstream press and the more melodramatic 9/11 skeptics.

A Zogby poll in 2004 found that 49% of New Yorkers believed that some national leaders "knew in advance" that the outrageous crimes would take place and did absolutely nothing to stop the murder of some 3,000 innocent Americans.

The psychologically devastating attacks of 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that Bush Administration officials said was necessary for their plans in the Middle East, according to the now infamous "Project for a New American Century" report published a year earlier.

Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, "Scooter" Libby and Paul Wolfowitz are the most notorious of the 16 members of PNAC who were installed in top positions of power once the Supreme Court appointed George W. Bush as president only nine months before the attacks took place.

http://www.sploid.com/news/2006/06/45_question_911.php

Incidentally, my definition for "recognition" in regards to the media would be for them to cover 9/11 Truth just as much as this or this.

Jon....

I'm working on starting a truth movement at the university I attend so I could legitimize the school paper writing about it and maybe getting a LC2E showing to happen. LC2E has a few fallacies though, like the B52 hitting the empire state building, so I'm wondering if it's known when LC final cut comes out? And I'm also wondering if there are any places I can find tips for starting a local truth movement at my school. I'd say it's about a 2/3 liberal school, about middle of the road as far as universities are concerned.

"Jon....

I'm working on starting a truth movement at the university I attend so I could legitimize the school paper writing about it and maybe getting a LC2E showing to happen. LC2E has a few fallacies though, like the B52 hitting the empire state building, so I'm wondering if it's known when LC final cut comes out? And I'm also wondering if there are any places I can find tips for starting a local truth movement at my school. I'd say it's about a 2/3 liberal school, about middle of the road as far as universities are concerned."

LC3 is due out in September I believe. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. As far as school... I would think it would be easy to post something on the Bulletin Boards in the hallways... post your number in little tear away pieces at the bottom, and someone is bound to call you.

You only need two people to have a meeting.

Jon...

That sounds good, I was just thinking that so many people have been in my position and might have advice to offer as to what strategies work well.

"Jon...

That sounds good, I was just thinking that so many people have been in my position and might have advice to offer as to what strategies work well."

I do know that a lot of schools already have 9/11 groups. Check to see if there's already one in existence.

Hey everyone, I think its good news at least it got a mention, sure the piece was bogus but it got out there. The same goes for the NY times hit piece, goto aol news while you can to vote.

On another note it was really great to personally talk to so many in the movement who I have only seen on video or read their researc. Dz was a great guy, and I always love running into somebigguy. Got to talk to Jon Gold and Kyle Hence for a time as well. Gary and the Lone Lantern Crew I don't want to leave you out either. Everyone seemed like good people with a mission. Get this info out there, and start prosecuting.

If we can get 100-150 to march in Chicago, and Alex can get 1,000 people to go to his conference, IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES GROUND ZERO CAN AFFORD US! If we can come 1,000 strong, stay respectable, SIR AND MRS people to death, convince them to take a copy of loose change and other material, the end will begin for the criminals. I truly believe in my heart that if people mobilize RIGHT NOW we can far exceed 1,000 people and become part of a historic event that may lead to the people regaining this once great nation.

Peace kids, we still have a lot of work ahead of us!

Hey Jason.

Rudy the Recycler blasts anti-terror cuts.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060606/ap_on_re_us/security_grants_giuliani

Hey, I would very much like to see some of the new friends I made at my site.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/05/terror/main1683852.shtml

Hey bb... I met you didn't I?

lol @ Jason "1,000 strong" Bermas haha

Should be shooting for 10,000 at least...especially if half of new york doubt the official story!!! We'll be in NY, so travel shouldn't be a problem for these local skeptics.

THOSE WHO WANT SOME
COME AND GET IT
BETTER COME STRONG
OR DON'T COME AT ALL.
THIS IS NOT A THREAT
ITS A PROMISE.

I will be in every newsperson's face that day and demand they cover the skeptics fairly.

lol @ Webster Tarpley too for saying he didn't know members of PNAC were zionists. Fool me once, shame on me...

These Loose Change kiddies better get their shit together or I'm going to start doubting their intentions as well...

remember what I said about coming strong...

and I KNOW its fool me once, shame on you... save it

Culhavoc has an interesting take on 6/06/06. Seriously, check it.
http://culhavoc.blogsome.com/2006/06/05/chicagos-sears-tower-60606/