Here's mine:

I watched Joe Scarborough's stand-in, Michael Smerconish, interview Mike Berger from 911truth.org . Mr. Smerconish refused to discuss the points Mr. Berger raised about the problems with the 9/11 Commission Report- why are he, Scarborough Country and MSNBC so uninterested in the Commission's and the government's suppression of the discovery of the black boxes at ground zero? Don't you want to know what they reveal? Don't you want to know why they denied they were recovered? Why didn't Mr. Smerconish ask Mr. Berger to elaborate on his claim that the testimony of Bush's Secretary of Transporation conflicts with the statements of documented liar Dick Cheney on Cheney's whereabouts on 9/11?

Additionally, Mr. Smerconish refused to address any of the points Mr. Berger made about WTC7, instead getting flustered, interrupting him and insisting on bringing up the Pentagon damage, claiming that the "small hole" and apparent lack of wreckage is central to the 9/11 Truth Movement's theory that we have not been told the whole truth about 9/11. It is not- as anyone knows who's researched alternative sources of information on 9/11. You are ignoring what is central to the Movement- the demand for answers to reasonable questions about the performance and statements of key officials and agencies, questions that were ignored by the 9/11 Commission, or answered with lies.

What a joke- even the person brought on to defend the official 9/11 story had to be rushed off the air because he questioned the Warren Commission's absurd conclusion, that Oswald was responsible for the Kennedy assassination. If Mr. Smerconish and Mr. Emerson had actually read the FEMA report, they would know that it did not claim WTC7's fall was related to damage related to the collapse of the twin towers:

FEMA Chapter 5: WTC 7 - page 5-1
The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers.

FEMA Chapter 5: WTC 7 - page 5-31
The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. [..] the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurance.

Scarborough Country and MSNBC have totally disrespected the 9/11 victims and their families, and insulted the intelligence of tens of millions of Americans.

Erik (I included my full name, address and phone in the email to msnbc)

70% of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee's Questionis were ignored by the Commission
http://www.911independentcommission.org/questions.html

Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official 9/11 Story
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

115 ommissions and distortions of the 9/11 Commission
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404

Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

--
Zogby Poll Finds Over 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation (Less than half trust the "Official Story")
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060522022041421

911blogger is gettin spam with porn bots.

It's a step up from the typical shill atleast.

Great job by Mike Berger...

I feel he did the best he could under the circumstances...

Three cheers :)

Lionel of 710 WOR New York demolishing Smerconish on his show last night:-)

Lionel is close to coming out as a truther.

Here's an interesting piece in Smerconish's bio:

"At the age of 29 he served as a presidential appointee under George H.W. Bush as a Regional Administrator in the Department of Housing and Urban Development."

Getting the right connections.

Anyways, the technique used by Smerconish is typical of those tv hosts that don't show any sign of respect for their guests (unless they are truly powerful and on your side).
It's interesting to note that Smerconish's strategy is that to give a few truths, like the zogby poll and the video (although bad quality) of the WTC7 collapse, and trying to mock the poll, saying people are buying it. If I were watching the show I'd be offended. But there is much more offensive stuff going on in the show.
Smerconish doesn't let Berger finish any of his arguments, he constantly interrupts, the volume of his voice is much higher than the guest's, he keeps asking questions but is not really interested in the answers. And look at the bottom of the screen: all it says is "Conspiracy vs. Reality". That's not very journalistic or objective.

Just sent in my mail:

Liars, Liars, set the world on fire:

But we'll hold you accountable anyway.

So, here is what Mr. Emerson said:

Listen, in any catastrophe your going to have sometimes irreconcilable statements because people's memories aren't.. aren't.. exactly accurate, they don't reconcile each other all the time, they don't confirm each other. However, in the statements that this man just made, I can tell you one that FEMA definitely, Federal Emergency Management Association, definitely concluded that World Trade Center building number 7 collapsed because of the collapse of number 1.

And here is what the source he is quoting here actually said:

FEMA Chapter 5: WTC 7 - page 5-1
The performance of WTC 7 is of significant interest because it appears the collapse was due primarily to fire, rather than any impact damage from the collapsing towers.
FEMA Chapter 5: WTC 7 - page 5-31
The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. [..] the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurance.

NIST hasn't report on WTC7 yet.

http://www.teamliberty.net/id243.html

Just add you for the forthcoming trial-list:

Accessories after the fact--are people who receive, comfort, or assist a felon knowing that he has committed a felony, or is sought in connection with the commission or attempted commission of a felony. See 234 A. 2d 284, 285. The term thus applies to anyone who obstructs justice by giving comfort or assistance to a criminal offender in an attempt to hinder or prevent his apprehension or punishment. 378 F. 2d 540, 542.

This should be especially be given fact for the so called "forth estate" (a bad joke, IMO)

No regards for covering-up a mass-murder on national tv...

Sitting-Bull

germany

it was pretty apparent the host's strategy was to get to the Pentagon right off the bat and bring up the questions of where the family members were if it wasn't 77 that hit the Pentagon. i can pretty much garauntee that anything else that could've been covered he would be completely clueless about - hence the focus on that subject.

how ironic that the discussion of the turning point of our modern day society can't get 10 minutes of real discussion. but of course the emotionally driven coverage is no problem to come by.

Jeers, not cheers, to Mike Berger who, when asked if the 9-11 Commission got it wrong, couldn't respond affirmatively (IOW, despite multiple openings/opportunities, he never would simply say "yes" to that question). What a weaseley wimp of a 911 truther Mike Berger turned out to be -- and that's giving him a huge benefit of my large doubt after the way he wasted limited time promoting the notion that 767s hit the WTC by referring to unsubstantiated hearsay evidence (which is especially inexcusable given all the the far more solid evidence which indicates that 767s did not not the WTC).

But, hey; that's what fake opponents do for one another...
______________________________________