...and you received a number of complaints about Reagan's threats to Dice, and then one of your staffers advises you that Dice is on the air with Reagan, after all of these complaints have been received, how seriously are you going to take the complaints?

If I was a commissioner, I would say "not very".

And what happens the next time one of these jackasses does the same thing? O'Reilly is notorious when he is on cable, but he has a radio show too. He walks a fine line, and it's just a matter of time before he pops off on 'Truthers' too.

Let's not set a precedent here. Let the FCC fine his frothing mouth off the airwaves if they see fit. We don't want to be seen as 'crying wolf'.

One fascist at a time. Just give 'em enough rope to do themselves in, and they will.

and that was the crime . . .

Lets give Mark Dice a chance to make his case.

He is on AJ's Sunday Show right now and he says he is not going to stop and says the Reagan should be fired and is asking for more complaints to be filed at the FCC.

He has also called for criminal prosecution.

So let Mark speak for himself.

We can still file on our own accord as Reagan threatened ALL Truthers sending DVD's & Truth material to the troops.

So that means you and me.

So this is a lot bigger than Dice alone.

I still say we should give MD a chance even if he does go on MR's show.

We are ALL INDIVIDUAL LEADERS - so NO ONE PERSONS SPEAKS FOR THE TRUTH IN TOTALITY.

We have an opportunity here and if Dice does go on air on MR's show perhaps he can plug some serious 911 Truth info like ae911truth.org - Karen Johnson etc.

Dice says a Pandora's box has been opened with the threats on him and the truthers. His own family has been death threated.

The issue here should be reaching out to MR's 4 million brainwashed audience. Silencing MR alone is not enough.

Dice may have weiged the costs.

Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and wait till we understand the full scope of developments.

We may be able to do both. Silence MR and reach out to some of those 4 million listeners.

EDIT - MD just said that that he is going to DEMAND that that MR be fired when he is on his radio show tomorrow.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Mark is also an eloquent speaker and handles himself skillfully while debating the devil.

Friday, June 13, 2008
Radio host calls for Mark Dice to be murdered. Ronald Reagan's adopted son, Michael Reagan, is calling for Mark Dice to be found and killed. He wants to pay for the bullets. Alex Jones and Mark Dice call for us to take action.
http://www.radiodujour.com/guests/dice_mark/

I've got to say that what Mark Dice is doing is very noble and courageous. Keep up the good work!

Although I don't know the exact protocol for handling complaints, I suspect that the FCC isn't that far gone that they can summarily dismiss a death threat made on public airwaves - at the very least, they must address it. I think it is irrelevant whether he goes on there as far as the complaint(s) go - it's now a matter of record, and must be followed through their Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division.

The jackasses will (and will continue) do this no matter who is speaking out against them. O'Reilly is different, in that he is brought to task by many of the mainstream media; hasn't he threatened a 9/11 family member or two in the past? I'm not aware that he has threatened anyone with death, tho. Please correct me if I'm mistaken.

I agree that they are hanging themselves - but only because people like Dice, and you, aren't letting them block out the sun with their fingers - and, IMO, making his presence known to Reagan's audience may not be a bad thing, but rather a good thing. Makes him visible, and perhaps safer.

Give the agency room to do their job and don't muddy the waters.
;-)
_____________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
http://truthaction.org/forum/
http://www.911blacklist.org/

I was just talking to Gillian and as an ex BBC journalist and film maker she made the point that Dice should attend but with these conditions;

1. No editing of the inerview and the interview to be filmed as to provide evidence if this is done.
2. He must not go alone and should take some one who is qualified to comment i.e.; Gage, Jones, etc
3. He must gain agreement there will not be any threats or personal attacks against him or his associates.
4. The interview must be a set length and he must recieve a set portion of time for his side of the story.

I personally still think he should not go because his audience is unlikely to listen to what is said and he might undermine his case against Reagan.

I think what Gillian has offered as advice would see the best possible outcome, if he does go!

Q. Does he look here rep?

Kind regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

this time I kinda agree with you.

Hopefully MD will have a chance to mention ae911truth.org, Operation Northwoods, LCFC, TerrorStrom etc.

We need start reaching out to our HARDEST CRITICS AND THEIR AUDIENCE.

So this looks like an opportunity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

I thought they took "live" calls?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

was not aware of that.

A number of people are saying if Dice goes on the show, that means he doesn't believe it was really a murder threat, meaning the FCC will dismiss the threat as being a threat? I'm not a lawyer and don't know; it seems like you guys do- what precedents are there?

How does Dice's refusal to believe his life is in danger change the seriousness of Reagan's threat- Dice may be crazy (like a fox?)

According to Martin Hill (corresponded by email and met him once, but i don't know him) Reagan has said he spoke rashly and didn't mean it. Even if Dice makes an ass out of himself, Reagan, by having him on his show and not killing him, no matter how he edits it- doesn't that prove his own idiocy, hypocrisy- and the right to say whatever we want about 9/11, even if it's irresponsible, bogus, bullshit?

That said, i'm all for a truth and reconciliation commission, and finding out who some of these people really are, that seem to have a full time media presence saying the stupidest, most cointelpro-sounding garbage- personally, i don't think they're all that destructive- the fact that they're out here in force loudly saying things most people immediately recognize as bullshit is just another clue 9/11 was an inside job- so that's where the missing $2.3 trillion is going, while the US is waaay behind on quality of life measures compared with other industrialized nations, and even productivity, even though we work more hours? Boy, these elites that control our media and political process SUCK; elites my ass- if you're elite, compete on a level playing field, where ALL the People have ALL the facts and you can't get away with mass murder and war-mongering, you fucking parasites. Damn Right, We the People will make better decisions than you- as Thomas Jefferson repeatedly noted.

edit- also, what are the precedents for Reagan's statements being protected speech; what laws make it illegal to make threats? Are they trying to legalize threat making? Oh, we're just kidding (psst- NOT! KILL! KILL! KILL!)

trying to understand what's going on...

9/11 Family Steering Committee Review of the 9/11 Commission Report:
http://911truth.org/images/resources/Family%20Steering%20Cmte%20review%2...

Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Did not know that either. The better solution might be to not go on the show, and then make sure Reagan is fired and criminal charges are pressed. That will in fact be a better opportunity for press coverage. Then again Mark Dice might just as well talk to the man with his best Christian intentions and try show him the light of truth about 9/11. One thing I know for sure, Mark Dice will make the best decision he can.

Cheers for the heads up.

I would definately advise AGAINST going on air in those circumstances. You WILL be framed out of the debate.

Did I say "debate"? Sorry, meant bloodbath...

______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
http://truthaction.org/forum/
http://www.911blacklist.org/

Firstly as you can see your point of view is well supported, and William really is the most experienced on such issues as you say! Don't go Mark!

A few questions "off topic" if you would indulge me...
Did you coin the term "Civil Informationing" as I am using it now and thought I should know were it came from?

What is your opinion of PfT allowing John Lear to remain a member after his "No Plane at the WTC" and "Remote Control impossible" video B/S? Your opinion...?

Finally due to the abuse of the word "truther" I have started referring to us as "9/11 Truth Advocates" do you think this is an appropriate term?

You said "BELIEVE!!!" and I with you and you've got to love quantum physics, lol!!

Kindest regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

>>And do some CI, or bannering, or emailing, or more research into AA77 and the Pentagon...[they are the Achilles Heels of the HI PERPS' schemes...]

Bannering and emailing, yes, but I think that our strongest points, such as demolition -- now published in a civil engineering journal -- are going to take us the farthest. Every aspect of the attack should be researched, but it's unfortunate there are so many poor and baseless claims, devoid of real science, about the Pentagon.