Is Fetzer correct that there were no seats or luggage recovered from the Pentagon plane? If so, what is the official explanation, that they burned up?

Fetzer must be thinking of Alex Jones. Nice touch that Delonge doesn't correct him; shows how serious Delonge is about the subject matter above his own ego.

Bowing down to your greater knowledge and research on this matter DHS, i'll take it that this was an ORIGINAL interview. But i do worry that it's a point of context for the shills out there.

Hey, does anyone know of any WTC 7 demolition flipbooks? That would be awesome to handout to people on the street... look at this crappy virtual one: http://www.fabrica.it/flipbook/flipbook_player.php?id=1134519093-2121222...

lol thanks for the ego inflation...
DHS | Homepage | 05.08.06 - 11:19 pm | #

No ego inflation intended, but credit where credits due.

hey,

alex hasn't added anything new to his audio archives in a long time. whats up wit that?

and hey..

anyone want to take over this blog for me?

www.911truthseekers.blogspot.com

http://www.nsa.gov/coremsgs/corem00003.cfm

The 4th amendment does demand it.

...this is now also making google news:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=9%2F11&btnG=Search+News

Hayden and the NSA- the most ignored "9/11 connection"?
A 'rant' based on research, compiled between 2001 and 2006,
by ewing2001
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2890

mirrored at
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=75&contentid=3498&...
with different spin introduction but the article should make clear, that this is NOT yet another limited hangout stuff!

also highly recommended:

http://www.wpr.org/webcasting/ideas_audioarchives.cfm?Code=jca
http://clipcast.wpr.org:8080/ramgen/wpr/jca/jca060501c.rm

Joy Cardin - 05/01C
After eight, Joy Cardin talks with a former Bush administration official who says nine-eleven was an inside job.

Guest: Morgan Reynolds, former chief economist, Department of Labor during
George W. Bush's first term. He is a U-W Madison alumnus, and will speak at
the State Historical Society, Saturday, May 6th.

Hi said....
"Is Fetzer correct that there were no seats or luggage recovered from the Pentagon plane? If so, what is the official explanation, that they burned up?
"

Yes, the official story is that the palne, along with everything else, just vaporized!!! LOL!!!

ewing:

great article from the looks of it, it is a bit too late at night for me to digest it all.

It would appear this is all moving too quickly...

Do you believe "fall guys" are being set up?

DHS,
the story is bigger than just setting up fall guys.
If "truthlings" would see the bigger picture, then Goss is already the victim
of a distraction ploy of this here:

"The Hayden-NSA PRE-9/11 and POST 9/11-spy program cover-up
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2890.0
Tue May 09 2006

The privatized Pentagon and the NSA/NRO/NGA will now finally take over, because leftgatekeepers looked to long on the distraction agencies CIA and FBI.

In other words, you see now the rise of one of the other goals of the planning of 9/11:
a domination war on a space surveillance program against Russia and China...

Truthlings however got fooled too long with the other distraction tools "oil"

Airliner seats are not even flammable. The notion that they'd be vaporized in a crash is incredibly silly. Well, so is the idea that engines made of steel and titanium would disappear into thin air.

Pentagon is the very soft underbelly of the official 9/11 fable which is why so many try to deflect attention away from it.

"""At 9:37:46, American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, traveling at approximately 530 miles per hour.61 All on board, as well as many civilian and military personnel in the building, were killed."""

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm

They needed to overhype the speed to underpin the nonsense about the vaporized plane.

I've always thought that claiming that speed - 530 mph - was just ridiculous. At first, you sort of hear it, and it goes in one ear and out the other. "Man, that plane was moving.

But then you think, well, the top speed of a 757 is about 620 mph. It lands and takes off at about 175-195 mph. So 530 mph seems awfully fast, especially to hit a 80 foot high wall directly.

Guess it must make sense to the people who don't think about it!

Due to air resistance at ground level a 757 simply can´t achieve this speed in level flight there. Remember we're talking about feet off the ground. Besides "ground effect" makes it impossible to control the plane in any way feet off the ground.

The energy release from a 100 ton plane crashing at 530 miles per hour would be stupendous to say the least and nothing like what was seen at the Pentagon.

I've been unsuccessful getting downloads from PodCast for weeks (I keep getting an instuction to download a plug-in, which I can't get to work either!)
I'm on an older Toshiba laptop running Windozzzze 98se.
Anybody have a recommendation?

install FIREFOX (5megs!) and its functions to install plugins.

... and

NICO tell us more!!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-869183917758574879

Ahmadinejad's Letter to Bush (9/11):

http://medias.lemonde.fr/mmpub/edt/doc/20060509/769629_lettre.pdf

I wonder why Bush hasn't allowed this letter to be published here in the U.S. yet..?

"September eleven was not a simple operation. Could it be planned and executed without coordination with intelligence and security services -- or their extensive infiltration? Of course, this is just an educated guess. Why have the various aspects of the attack been kept secret? Why are we not told who botched their responsibilities? And, why aren't those responsible and the guilty parties identified and put on trial?" - p.4.

They're making fun of Washington and the excessively gullible people who buy the 9/11 fable. :)

http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060509/OPINION02...