Here’s a breakdown of the History Channel hit piece in a nutshell

Here’s a breakdown of the History Channel hit piece in a nutshell. Boy was this ever a highly unprofessional, condescending, biased work of ad hominem propaganda. Conspiracy theorists were derided throughout the program as being ignorant, mean and kooky with no personal lives. On the other hand, the Popular Mechanics editors were given the last word on each and every subject along with the undeserving title of “expert”. To the best of my knowledge, not one of the pencil pushing staff members have any credentials that are relevant to any aspect of 9/11 truth. Of course it was the conspiracy theorists that were accused of not having anyone of the valid expertise necessary for stating their assertions logically. They do this by completely ignoring the very existence and works of groups like architects and engineers for 9/11 and Pilots for 9/11 truth. Also just as expected, the History Channel failed to disclose the Chertoff connection and other major conflicts of interests that have clearly drastically compromised the research and conclusions of their so-called “experts”. It was disingenuous and deceptive from the very start. It only got worse.

They made the claim that the fires did not have to melt the steel in order for the buildings to have collapsed. They even admit that the fires did not burn hot enough to melt the steel. What they completely ignored is the undeniable fact that steel was observed and analyzed as having been melted by firefighters and experts alike. So we’re left wondering how exactly it was that steel was found in a molten state if as they had clearly stated themselves, it couldn’t have happened in the first place? The NY Times referred to this phenomenon as being “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered” and yet just like NIST, the History Channel and Popular Mechanics simply chose to ignore it.

Ignored study:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/index.html

They decided to only show the 90-foot hole in the Pentagon that occurred twenty minutes after the initial impact of the plane rather than showing us the most important photo of the much smaller hole that was only roughly sixteen feet wide immediately after impact. Another very convenient omission of crucial evidence.

Ignored photo:
http://911review.org/images/snopes/hole.JPG

Here's one of the most egregious lies that I noticed. HC mentioned the comments of FDNY Chief of Safety Albert Turi about reports that he had recieved that day. NBC reporter Pat Dawson claimed that what Turi actually said was that he had heard explosions, not bombs. But that was a total lie according to Dawson’s own account (listen below), “reports of a secondary device, that is another ‘bomb’ going off”.

NBC ignored its own report:
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/may2004/050504bombsinwtc.htm

As we can see, Mr. Dawson has a personal vendetta against the 9/11 truth movement.:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/7554

A few key points ignored by the hit piece.

No mention of the multiple news reports that reported building seven as having collapse before it ever did.

No mention of Pakistan’s ISI Chief (the alleged “money man” behind 9/11) meeting in Washington the very morning of 9/11.

These are just a few points off the top of my head. I’ll have more to add as my memory becomes refreshed. There was just so much that was either ignored, misconstrued or outright false in this piece.

they even managed to play

they even managed to play the old "anti-semite" card along along with hitting us with the "your hurting the families" crap. truly disgusting but so typical and predictable. and yes, that scumbag Mr. Dawson has a vendetta. and i guess its obvious now that Steven Jones research is extremely powerful and hard to refute. he got 2 sentences in and wasnt allowed to present any of his work. in the end though, it was a weak hit-piece and probably gained us quite a few converts despite how one sided it was.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Here's an excerpt

of something I'm writing:

Bill Doyle, from the largest Coalition of 9/11 Families says "the 9/11 Commission report doesn't even begin to get at the truth," and that “it looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts—a lot of families now feel the same way… The continuing cover-up is beyond belief." In mid-2006, when asked how many of the 7000 family members he represents believe 9/11 was an inside job, Bill Doyle responded “50-50”.

Those who cite the 9/11 commission report as “definitive” are misinformed, since the report itself is the primary reason why many family members suspect a “cover-up”. The 9/11 Family Steering Committee presented 400 questions and the 9/11 commission gave 30% of the answers. Subsequently, After the report was finished:

“An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11… [called] for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur… Focusing on twelve questions, the Statement highlights areas of incriminating evidence that were either inadequately explored or ignored by the Kean Commission.”

Dismissing these questions as “conspiracy theories” is an insult to the 9/11 family members. Like the MSM, the 9/11 commission continues to be too cowardly or too complicit to even ask them. This is an inexcusable and embarrassing “conspiracy fact”. The MSM often outrageously claims that it is an insult to the victims of 9/11 to question the official story, when the family members themselves are the ones demanding answers.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

I stopped watching about 30 mins into it

was just as you list here a complete hit piece without a shred of credibility. Thankfully this was so bad that the only people that would be swayed by such a pathetic show would be those that are unreachable anyway.

I couldn't agree more!!!!

I know it is easy for this type of thing to get us really pissed, but step back and take a deep breath, now simply conduct a micro experiment, "excluding "everyone you know who is down with the "truth", start asking folks if they saw this hit piece, ironically, the majority of the people who watched this last night were truthers, I can promise all of you, 98% of 911 "virgins" if you will ,did not see this hit piece,so continue the good work, raise a glass of your favorite poison, and laugh at the fact that all this hit piece did was justify your fight!!!!!!

Let's all email the History Channel

and suggest they do a series on the various aspects of 9/11.

It would be more worthwhile than their series of Ice Road Truck Drivers.

Does anyone have a recording

Does anyone have a recording (TIVO or something?) of the original broadcast from last night that can be posted on the net? I have a hunch that the History Channel has caught wind of the fact that we’ve pinpointed many of their errors and they’re going to edit some of them out before the program airs again. I have a feeling that Dawson’s contradictory comments will be removed and then denied though I could be wrong.

This will strengthen the movement

The best Expert response if I remember correctly "He said he heard an explosion, he didn't say he heard a bomb." That is what they call expert. This documentary made all the experts look like fools because they sounded like Official conspiracy nuts. How about the Minneta testimony. Instead of addressing the statement they personally attacked the truth movement. "Oh the conspiracy theorists love these vacuums." Just say the truth ass that this testimony could prove to be worthy of further investigation instead of attacking the movement which is irrelevant to the answer. I think it is time that the movement starts hitting the Liberal TV media and attacking Giulianni because let's face it that is why they are trying to debunk this effort so that they can discredit those trying to discredit their best chance of beating Billary Clinton.

lets not forget Lester

lets not forget Lester Holt's role in this. make him regret standing on the side of shameless propaganda. i havent found any contact information on him yet.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Hole with firefighter water

"They decided to only show the 90-foot hole in the Pentagon that occurred twenty minutes after the initial impact of the plane rather than showing us the most important photo of the much smaller hole that was only roughly sixteen feet wide immediately after impact. Another very convenient omission of crucial evidence."

That "smaller hole" you are referring to is the "larger hole" covered by firefighter water.
http://911review.org/images/snopes/hole.JPG

I remember when this photo fooled me, so don't feel bad.

http://www.911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pentagonhole_photos_notate...

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

They should be proud

I thought it presented the miracles of makeup/fantasy/deception in a nice little two-hour fictional documentary. Gavin was made all pretty and presented like the whore he is. The scope of the documentary was prevalent from the onset, a two-hour hit-piece for those who like fantasies before bed time. Deception is the category that such filth will be filed under in the halls of history. All in all, another standard production by what is left of the MSM.

What about the Put Options??

They just happen to not mention that. They focused alot on the 'low hanging fruit' stuff like the little white puffs on the side of the towers and the plane that was flying around the pentagon after the crash. They ignored the harder to answer issues.