Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

World Trade Center Collapse Video REVEALS Demolition Sequence.

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
| | | | |

This video is not new, it actually has been used with fake explosion sounds to prove demolitions at the wtc.

This video is the original with no sound edits, it is stabilized, zoomed, 1/4 speed to reveal a demolition sequence 40 floors below going off diagonally reaching the service floor.

Not a conspiracy or fact?


There is clearly a straight

There is clearly a straight line of explosions from the initial squib, up diagonally to the right, to the second squib at the service floor. Question: if the visible expulsions of debris were caused by air being forced out by the upper section of the building crashing down, as the official story would have it, how did the expulsions move UP diagonally in a STRAIGHT line??? Explosions? You got it.

i dunno

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

First of all the video you

First of all the video you present (metacafe) is a later part of the same footage that earlier shows what appears to be a thermite reaction and molten-iron spewing out of the same corner. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qitq-a9DXBU
The corner failure could very well be a result of that.
(note the explosive nature of 3-4 dust plumes on top of the collapse, spewing out rapidly at 1:53, center-left)

Second, you're apparently unfamiliar with the fact that demolitions pre-weaken a building. There are many flashes seen in the north tower going off randomly and many are not even close to the fires or impact-site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY
Also note that in the south tower collapse, many flashes can be seen going off in rapid succession.

Thermite also didn't have to be used entirely, it could've been easily combined with other explosives.

Typical demolitions also don't bring down a building to explode outward. But given the situation, how would anybody expect it to be a typical demolition with typical equipment and setup?

A building cannot crush itself entirely at the same speed to the ground even if the upper section was in-tact.
Definitely impossible considering the upper section and subsequent floors were obliterated and scattered hundreds of feet from all sides.
An initial crushing force of mass, if obliterated and vacated from the structure below, therefore loses it's ability to be a crushing force.
There is an energy gap there and the only thing to supply it would be explosives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosopher (1844 - 1900)

provenance?

How do we know that "this video is the original with no sound edits"? What good is just stating that as fact with no explanation to back it up?

The alternate audio track

The alternate audio track aired on the Discovery Channel "Inside the Twin Towers" documentary September of 2006. I believe the authenticity is still in question. It was certainly not faked by a truther as it aired on several networks all over the world. View part 8 to see the clip. http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=Inside+the+twin+towers
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808138/

Squibs addressed here...


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://TruthSeeker.us
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here http://www.RockCreekFreePress.com

Is there a way to expand the

Is there a way to expand the video (like on youtube)?

"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosopher (1844 - 1900)

Fullscreen...

http://blip.tv/file/306082

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://TruthSeeker.us
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here http://www.RockCreekFreePress.com

Word

Yep! Looks like a controlled demolition to me.

It seems a little odd to me

It seems a little odd to me that the explosives would detonate in a diagonal line like that. I don't believe it was caused by air being forced out through the elevator shafts either. To tell the truth, I'm perplexed. Can we be absolutely certain that the line of explosions we see on this video are extant on the original video, and not something added on later to muddy up the evidence?

It's authentic

I noticed that diagonal line of explosions since late 2005 when I saw Loose Change 2. You can count on that footage being genuine. What's debatable is the audio...I've heard different versions of this clip with different sound tracks...

lots to discuss about this one

Firstly, there's a much clearer, higher-resolution clip than the one the YouTube video was made from here: http://fenopy.com/torrent/911__Multiple__Sequential_Explosions_from_WTC2...

[The file name of the high-quality clip is: WTC2 Demolition - southwest-below (HQ-Audio-frames missing).avi]

Secondly, the audio is certainly disputed. Here's some analysis I wrote in a bog entry ( http://www.911blogger.com/node/6806 - worth a look because there's another stabilized & better quality YouTube video there) :

ABOUT THE NON-DEMOLITION AUDIO CLIP
- the clip begins with theme music which means the audio was certainly altered (though to what degree is questionable)
- lots of people can be seen running from the collapse, but the voice of only one person is heard in this clip

ABOUT THE DEMOLITION AUDIO CLIP
- lots of voices can be heard which is what you'd expect when lots of people are visible
- the audio corresponds to the video: a loud explosion draws the attention of the firemen, squibs and the upper floors of WTC2 are seen "popping out" while sequential explosion noises give way to a hail of explosion noises
- there are more audio details in this clip: glass breaking, something metal (a tripod?) falling over, many people yelling and screaming, debris hitting the ground
- There are several different versions of this clip with wildly varying quality, and the different water marks/logos visible in these clips means that creating a fake of each one would be difficult
- (NEW) I recently saw a clip of a witness describing "popping" and "firecracker" noises as WTC2 collapsed, so this clip has at least some corroboration
- (SPECULATION) I think the non-demolition audio clip was faked because clips with the real audio were leaked (or going to be leaked) anyway. Regardless, there was and still is a lot of confusion over which is the real audio. What is needed is someone to find this clip in its original context, from a broadcast on or near 9/11, from any of the archived news footage that can be had these days. Perhaps the TV channel logos from the many different versions I've seen would be a start (download the torrent if you're interested in the TV channel logos)...

Anyway, thanks for the effort on this clip - I really think it deserves closer examination, and your blog entry may spark a lot of interest. Cheers,

pb

Disinfo

Audio in this clip is the real one, whats next, missile pods?

That youtube video with

That youtube video with added on explosion audio is just disninfo-bait .

No discussion, so cheers this.

How do you know the demolition audio is fake?

It's the other audio - in which only one person is heard - that sounds fake.