Blogads

Blogads

Asbestos Dangers



Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.

FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.

Get the news, get the facts.

User login

RSS Feeds


Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


World Trade Center Collapse Video REVEALS Demolition Sequence.

( Home » blogs » Godspeed2012's blog » World Trade Center... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by Godspeed2012 on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 3:39pm.
| | | | |

This video is not new, it actually has been used with fake explosion sounds to prove demolitions at the wtc.

This video is the original with no sound edits, it is stabilized, zoomed, 1/4 speed to reveal a demolition sequence 40 floors below going off diagonally reaching the service floor.

Not a conspiracy or fact?


» login to post comments | 3 points

There is clearly a straight

There is clearly a straight line of explosions from the initial squib, up diagonally to the right, to the second squib at the service floor. Question: if the visible expulsions of debris were caused by air being forced out by the upper section of the building crashing down, as the official story would have it, how did the expulsions move UP diagonally in a STRAIGHT line??? Explosions? You got it.

Submitted by bela lugosi on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 5:20pm.
» login to post comments | -6 points

i dunno

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by Tiguhs OndaBayou on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 5:42pm.
» login to post comments | 7 points

First of all the video you

First of all the video you present (metacafe) is a later part of the same footage that earlier shows what appears to be a thermite reaction and molten-iron spewing out of the same corner. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qitq-a9DXBU
The corner failure could very well be a result of that.
(note the explosive nature of 3-4 dust plumes on top of the collapse, spewing out rapidly at 1:53, center-left)

Second, you're apparently unfamiliar with the fact that demolitions pre-weaken a building. There are many flashes seen in the north tower going off randomly and many are not even close to the fires or impact-site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY
Also note that in the south tower collapse, many flashes can be seen going off in rapid succession.

Thermite also didn't have to be used entirely, it could've been easily combined with other explosives.

Typical demolitions also don't bring down a building to explode outward. But given the situation, how would anybody expect it to be a typical demolition with typical equipment and setup?

A building cannot crush itself entirely at the same speed to the ground even if the upper section was in-tact.
Definitely impossible considering the upper section and subsequent floors were obliterated and scattered hundreds of feet from all sides.
An initial crushing force of mass, if obliterated and vacated from the structure below, therefore loses it's ability to be a crushing force.
There is an energy gap there and the only thing to supply it would be explosives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosopher (1844 - 1900)

Submitted by Thrashaero on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 8:13pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

provenance?

How do we know that "this video is the original with no sound edits"? What good is just stating that as fact with no explanation to back it up?

Submitted by jfal on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 5:47pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

The alternate audio track

The alternate audio track aired on the Discovery Channel "Inside the Twin Towers" documentary September of 2006. I believe the authenticity is still in question. It was certainly not faked by a truther as it aired on several networks all over the world. View part 8 to see the clip. http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=Inside+the+twin+towers
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808138/

Submitted by Xenomorph911 on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 7:59pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Squibs addressed here...


Video thumbnail. Click to play
Click To Play

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://TruthSeeker.us
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here http://www.RockCreekFreePress.com

Submitted by chucksheen on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 7:02pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Is there a way to expand the

Is there a way to expand the video (like on youtube)?

"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosopher (1844 - 1900)

Submitted by Thrashaero on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 8:12pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points

Fullscreen...

http://blip.tv/file/306082

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://TruthSeeker.us
Spread the word! Many hands make light work! EMA: educate, motivate, activate.
Improve your activist toolkit and get your free RCFPs here http://www.RockCreekFreePress.com

Submitted by chucksheen on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 3:49pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Word

Yep! Looks like a controlled demolition to me.

Submitted by JR on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 7:31pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

It seems a little odd to me

It seems a little odd to me that the explosives would detonate in a diagonal line like that. I don't believe it was caused by air being forced out through the elevator shafts either. To tell the truth, I'm perplexed. Can we be absolutely certain that the line of explosions we see on this video are extant on the original video, and not something added on later to muddy up the evidence?

Submitted by bela lugosi on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 3:14am.
» login to post comments | 2 points

It's authentic

I noticed that diagonal line of explosions since late 2005 when I saw Loose Change 2. You can count on that footage being genuine. What's debatable is the audio...I've heard different versions of this clip with different sound tracks...

Submitted by JR on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 10:44am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

lots to discuss about this one

Firstly, there's a much clearer, higher-resolution clip than the one the YouTube video was made from here: http://fenopy.com/torrent/911__Multiple__Sequential_Explosions_from_WTC2...

[The file name of the high-quality clip is: WTC2 Demolition - southwest-below (HQ-Audio-frames missing).avi]

Secondly, the audio is certainly disputed. Here's some analysis I wrote in a bog entry ( http://www.911blogger.com/node/6806 - worth a look because there's another stabilized & better quality YouTube video there) :

ABOUT THE NON-DEMOLITION AUDIO CLIP
- the clip begins with theme music which means the audio was certainly altered (though to what degree is questionable)
- lots of people can be seen running from the collapse, but the voice of only one person is heard in this clip

ABOUT THE DEMOLITION AUDIO CLIP
- lots of voices can be heard which is what you'd expect when lots of people are visible
- the audio corresponds to the video: a loud explosion draws the attention of the firemen, squibs and the upper floors of WTC2 are seen "popping out" while sequential explosion noises give way to a hail of explosion noises
- there are more audio details in this clip: glass breaking, something metal (a tripod?) falling over, many people yelling and screaming, debris hitting the ground
- There are several different versions of this clip with wildly varying quality, and the different water marks/logos visible in these clips means that creating a fake of each one would be difficult
- (NEW) I recently saw a clip of a witness describing "popping" and "firecracker" noises as WTC2 collapsed, so this clip has at least some corroboration
- (SPECULATION) I think the non-demolition audio clip was faked because clips with the real audio were leaked (or going to be leaked) anyway. Regardless, there was and still is a lot of confusion over which is the real audio. What is needed is someone to find this clip in its original context, from a broadcast on or near 9/11, from any of the archived news footage that can be had these days. Perhaps the TV channel logos from the many different versions I've seen would be a start (download the torrent if you're interested in the TV channel logos)...

Anyway, thanks for the effort on this clip - I really think it deserves closer examination, and your blog entry may spark a lot of interest. Cheers,

pb

Submitted by PolarBear on Tue, 07/24/2007 - 12:33pm.
» login to post comments | -2 points

Disinfo

Audio in this clip is the real one, whats next, missile pods?

Submitted by Godspeed2012 on Tue, 07/24/2007 - 4:24pm.
» login to post comments | -2 points

That youtube video with

That youtube video with added on explosion audio is just disninfo-bait .

No discussion, so cheers this.

Submitted by Godspeed2012 on Tue, 07/24/2007 - 4:19pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

How do you know the demolition audio is fake?

It's the other audio - in which only one person is heard - that sounds fake.

Submitted by PolarBear on Tue, 07/24/2007 - 9:53pm.