The ex-Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahatir Mohammed, a feisty straight-talking politician, has reiterated his view that the September 11 attacks were an inside job. Mahatir, famous to Australians after being dubbed "recalcitrant" by ex-Prime Minister Paul Keating, apparently demonstrates more flexibility of mind in being open to the possibility of an inside job than Mr Keating, who to the best of my knowledge has never demonstrated what it takes to speak truth about the 911 attacks.

From Press TV: Original story here

An excellent interview with Richard Gage on 'Keeping It Real With Mike and Jeff' on Las Vegas AM station KNUU about a month ago, with hundreds of thousands of listeners in four states, I believe.

I hadn't seen this posted anywhere and I think it's definitely worth a listen. Mike and Jeff are great, very enthusiastic and supportive and Richard is the absolute professional as always.

http://970knuu.com/Local%20Shows/Keeping%20It%20Real/Keeping%20It%20Real%203-23-10.mp3

About a week ago, I sent out some tweets on my Twitter Feed concerning the destruction of the World Trade Centre, False Flags in general, and related matters.

No sooner had I done this, than I received a tweet from a lady calling herself "DrBabsie", one Tracy Blevins Postert, Ph. D, which went as follows:

"Challenge to Steven Jones and Niels Harrit: Debate me on thermite. Dr. Tracy Blevins Postert http://howitwasdone911.blogspot.com".

Well, naturally enough, as a 911Blogger reader since 2006, I can recognise disinfo. So I had a look at her blog; if anything, I was surprised at just how bad it was - poorly written, and not even close to being convincing. Not surprising at all was the information that she is associated with one, "Dr Judy Woods".

So I sent some tweets back her way; told her she should write a scientific paper like Harrit and Jones did if she wanted to challenge them; and reaffirmed my own staunch support of our best investigators, like Harrit, Jones, Ryan, Gage etc.

Chomsky Says President Obama Continues Bush Policy To Control Middle East Oil
by Sherwood Ross
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0911/S00052.htm

Noam Chomsky spoke at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London Oct. 27th.
Academic activist Chomsky is known to the 911 Truth Movement as a denier of the facts of controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings, in spite of the massive amount of irrefutable evidence (most of us see it as ordinary common sense backed up by hard core science).

As I recall, Chomsky also insisted, as many deniers do, that any conspiracy would have to be too large, that too many people would have to be involved, for it to have occurred. Then he dismissed his challengers with a wave of the hand and said, "What does it matter?"

I suspect that when Chomsky did this, he knew his arguments couldn't stand up, but he couldn't admit his mistake or the fact that he had been deceived, so he resorted to outright denial and a pretense of apathy; I also believe he still can't admit that he was wrong but probably knows it deep inside.

Now here we have Chomsky giving a speech in which he describes the war in Iraq as