Title: The Fugitive, His Dead Wife, and the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory That Explains Everything

http://www.gq.com/story/kurt-sonnenfeld-9-11-conspiracy-theory

http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2015/jul/16/terrorism-buildings-design-architecture-how-world-trade-collapse-911-...

July 15, 2015

Devastating terrorist attacks which cause structures to collapse are helping researchers come up with safer building plans. The 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centre, as well as the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, are just two which have been studied at the University of New South Wales to help researchers in their quest for more stable structures.

Catastrophic Science is a series produced by the University of New South Wales

http://www.kaaltv.com/article/stories/s3853321.shtml
http://www.keyc.com/story/29568362/911-mobile-exhibit-opens-for-first-time-in-minnesota
http://kimt.com/2015/07/15/national-911-exhibit-is-in-the-area/

If you are nearby Waseca County, MN between Thursday July 16, 2015 and Saturday July 18, 2015 you may be interested to go see what artifacts are on display at the mobile unit.

Please share experience if you go to see the 9/11 mobile unit.

Is NIST trying to get ahead of the curve for how to handle forensic science errors in WTC reports?

Registration for the event has closed. Bummer. Maybe somebody nearby the event can interview some people at the event.

These are the types of events that we need to engage NIST at. This would have been a great forum to ask TOUGH questions about NISTS WTC 7 collapse study using their DIGITAL MODEL as PROOF of their THEORY. Would be good to bring up the measurement of the phase 2 of free-fall collapse in the WTC 7 report.

http://www.nist.gov/forensics/forensic_error_mgmt_2015.cfm

http://www.nist.gov/director/international_forensics_home.cfm

[quote]
On behalf of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and its partners, we are announcing the first-ever international symposium devoted exclusively to the topic of forensic science error management. Join us in Arlington, VA, July 20-24, 2015 for the International Symposium on Forensic Science Error Management – Detection, Measurement and Mitigation.
.....
Organizers are planning the meeting around several tracks:

Criminalistics and Digital Evidence;

Just read New York Times coverage,

Paul Lioy died July 8, 2015

Cause of death is TBA.

Collapsed at airport at age 68

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/12/nyregion/paul-lioy-scientist-who-analyzed-9-11-dust-and-its-health-effects-dies-at-68.ht...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_J._Lioy

I just saw the new "Jurassic World" Movie in 3D at the Imax and before the start of the film were all the upcoming movie previews.

Two of the movie previews caught my attention that I thought could help give attention to 9/11 truth if played right.

First Movie was called "The Walk" with an October 2, 2015 release date.
-The story of French high-wire artist Philippe Petit's attempt to cross the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in 1974. ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3488710/ )

Second Movie was called "Ant-Man" with a July 17, 2015 release date.
-Armed with a super-suit with the astonishing ability to shrink in scale but increase in strength, con-man Scott Lang must embrace his inner hero and help his mentor, Dr. Hank Pym, plan and pull off a heist that will save the world. ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478970/ )

The Walk:
The movie trailer shows spectacular views of the WTC which show the scale of how massive the buildings were. A lot of attention / interest will be directed toward the Twin Towers. It shows people sneaking past security and might warm people's minds up to the idea of questioning more 9/11.

http://youtu.be/JbnW_NoiUTM

A common theme seems to be that the people who do not support a new investigation either have never read any 9/11 building reports, have no opinion, or have no idea of what WTC 7 even is.

Here is another LEADER who has never read any of the reports but firmly believes that the reports cover information substantially.

Recently I've seen McCain plead ignorance, Chomsky plead no opinion, and now this Congressman pleas that the investigation has adequately shown the facts but admits to not have actually read any of investigations himself.

The congressman was asked a question on WTC 7 and the Congressman says that radical terrorists brought it down; not fires..... But then again he hasn't read any of the reports so he doesn't know the actual NIST story is ordinary office fires.