Here's what I don't understand. It's bad enough that they are clearly not advocates of 9/11 Truth... but why do gatekeeper on the left feel the need to attack the 9/11 Truth Movement? Why not just shut-up about it? What do they possibly hope to gain by going after us? Especially considering that we ARE RIGHT... and they are soooo very WRONG.

Christopher Hayes has penned the latest worthless hit-piece on the 9/11 Truth Movement. For some reason, The Nation has chosen to actually publish it. The article, entitled "9/11: The Roots of Paranoia" is poorly written. It is poorly researched. It is highly opinionated. It is logically inconsistent. In a word... it is WEAK. Why the Nation continues to tempt fate by lending credibility to these "conspiracy deniers" is beyond me.

Mr. Hayes even acknowledges that "one-third of Americans think the government either carried out the 9/11 attacks or intentionally allowed them to happen." I have no doubt that the number is much larger, but let's just say it's only one-third. Clearly the majority of this group are going to be "progressive" thinkers. These are the people most likely to actually read "the Nation". Why risk alienating up to a 1/3 or more of your core readers? It just doesn't make any sense! I for one feel thoroughly alienated by the Nation. Quite frankly they sicken me.

Here, from the mouth of a "first responder"; a fireman named Douglas Herman speaks truth to power, about what really occurred on 9/11/01. in 9/11-Why We Fight Mr. Herman talks about how 343 of his brave brothers perished. About how all too many U.S. citizens have turned a blind eye, and still do, to this very day.

This is a well written article from Rense.com on the truth of what happened that fateful day. It also speaks to what America will face if we fail to honor the memory of those who died by bringing that truth to light. Five years is far too long for this injustice to go unredressed.

We need more brave men like Douglas Herman to speak out on what they know. If you agree, please take a moment to "buzz" this story at http://www.buzzflash.net/shakeit.php.

As many here already know, Buzzflash.com recently launched a new "user-driven" news website at Buzzflash.net. Supposedly users have the opportunity to drive the top news story by "buzzing" it.

Within 48 hours of the launch of this new site by Buzzflash, the top buzzed story was "Pulling the 9/11 Lynchpin". It has remained the top story for the last several weeks.

Buzzflash.com is part of the left-gatekeeping wing of the so-called "progressive media". As such, they do not like to shine the light of truth on anything 9/11 related. Don't take my word for it, visit www.buzzflash.com and try to find any articles supportive of 9/11 truth. You won't.

So then it was not a surprise when little subtle efforts popped up to downplay the wealth of 9/11 truth articles that are consistently buzzed at Buzzflash.net. Most recently, the Infowars article entitled 9/11 Truth Remains The Critical Issue has popped up on the Buzzflash.net cue. Posted right above the article is this "warning label" that reads: "This story has negative votes. Be careful before you buzz."

The Venezuelan government officially regards Bush as a genocidal Nazi who arranged the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to justify aggression against other nations.

See article: HERE

To date, this is the first world nation to make such a declaration official. While the news of this event has been sharply ridiculed, it represents a stunning benchmark that has the potential to open the floodgates on world opinion regarding the truth behind the attacks of 9/11.

Say what you will about Hugo Chavez, he has proven himself to be a leader unafraid to speak truth to U.S. imperalist power. This in and of itself sets him apart from 99% of all world leaders.

This declaration by Venezuala represents a significant benchmark. The fact that it coincides with the shift in congress represents a significant opportunity. 9/11 Truth is a topic that will never go away. It will however, be ignored. Unless we continue to force the issue.

Venezuala has levied some serious charges against the U.S. Government. It is incumbant upon us as citizens to answer these charges. Our U.S. Representatives are responsible for setting the record straight.

Bush Admits He Lied About Rumsfeld For Political Purposes

Last week, President Bush unequivocally told a group of reporters that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and Vice President Cheney would “remain with him until the end of his presidency, extending a job guarantee to two of the most-vilified members of his administration.” Bush said, “Both those men are doing fantastic jobs and I strongly support them.”

Today, he announced Rumsfeld is resigning and being replaced by former CIA Director Robert Gates. At the press conference, Bush said that “the only way to answer that question, and get it on to another question, was to give you [the reporters] that answer.” Bush admitted that he had talked to Rumsfeld about resigning and was actively searching for his replacement at the time. Watch it: HERE.

Thus far, the mainstream media seems content to give Bush a pass for admitting to this blatant deception. ABC news characterized it as Bush having "misled" the press. It's one thing to mislead by withholding pertinent information or shading the truth, it's another thing entirely to LIE OUTRIGHT. This MUST call into question every statement of consequence ever uttered by Bush, from the claim that Iraq had WMD's on back to what he knew about 9/11 and when he knew it.

Flight 93 'was shot down' claims book - UK Daily Mail

"Twelve eyewitnesses state seeing another jet nearby."

"They claim they saw an F-16 move closer in and fire what were probably two Sidewinder missiles, one of them catching at least one of the Boeing’s huge engines, after which the ‘plane dropped like a stone’."

"Someone else ‘heard a loud bang’ and saw the airliner plummet. A Vietnam War veteran said he ‘heard a missile’, a sound he knew well... there are numerous and highly credible witness accounts of a mysterious white jet being seen after Flight 93 went down."

"Jim Brant, owner of the Indian Lake marina where debris was found, said he heard the roar of jet engines overhead, then saw a fireball rise into the air. He looked up and noticed a white plane circling the wreckage. ‘It reminded me of a fighter jet,’ he said."

If you are still living in a sick neo-con christian-fascist bubble (as is George Bush), what is the next best thing to serving up Osama Bin Laden as an October Surprise? My guess is it will be serving up Saddam's head on a stick (remember: "he tried to kill my dad!". Especially considering UBL is probably already dead or is still on the CIA payroll.

We all know how much the Bush cabal likes parading the carcass of so-called "evil doers" all over for the world to see. Remember Uday and Qusay? This is a sick bunch of wannabe cowboys.

But there may be a heavy price to pay for Saddam's blood. As the following article illustrates, if Saddam (or should I say WHEN Saddam) is found guilty and sentenced to death, Iraqi law requires that his execution be carried out within 30 days. I bet these sick sons of bitches are ghoulish enough to actually do it on Halloween (Oct. 31).

There is little doubt but that they do plan to "off" Saddam. They have to! He knows too much. But at what cost? Plus, the way things are going in Iraq... there is a realistic chance that the world may rally and actually call for his return to power. Something Bush would never allow to happen. But things are getting so unbelievably bad, perhaps the only way to avoid that eventuality is to kill him. And my guess is that's exactly what they plan to do.

Given the bombshell revelations in Bob Woodward's new book, "State of Denial" and Condi's weak and unconvincing "denials" and "deflections", we have more than enough reason to call for a completely new investigation of the events surrounding September 11, 2001.

Here are some of Condi's verbatim statements about the allegations that she was strongly warned by George Tenet of an impending attack on America:

"What I am quite certain of is that I would remember if I was told, as this account apparently says, that there was about to be an attack in the United States, and the idea that I would somehow have ignored that I find incomprehensible," Rice said.

"I don't know that this meeting took place, but what I really don't know, what I'm quite certain of, is that it was not a meeting in which I was told there was an impending attack and I refused to respond," Rice said.

Rice referred to the session as "the supposed meeting" and noted that it is not part of the independent Sept. 11 Commission's report.

"I remember that George was very worried and he expressed that," Rice told reporters. "We were all very worried because the threat reporting was quite intense. The problem was that it was also quite nebulous."

PUTS FORECAST OCT. SURPRISE?
Sunday, October 01, 2006 - FreeMarketNews.com

Source: FMNN

INITIAL POST 09.30.06

A faithful reader and commentator, "A. Magnus" writes has written the following email, posted to FMNN General Feedback:

"Do you like October suprises? Is there a big bang coming to hit the markets? If you believe that those in the know use insider information before major events then you might be interested on the HUGE number of October 6th put options for the big indexes. Check out the concentrated puts on the Diamonds DOW Trust (DIA):

See FMNN for specific financial data. (REQUIRES REGISTRATION)

According to the post: "Make no mistake - something wicked this way comes, and the smart money has already taken preventative steps."

(Reposted from a previous blog)

Final Post (on 9/11 Blogger) from Lauro Chavez:

Honestly, you know what - I’m done with all of this. Every time I log onto this site, it just makes me sick. I cant believe I actually told myself this was the right thing to do. You all proceed on with your investigative studies - I'm going to continue to tell my story to people who actually care; not people who question the questioners. I'm on your side - remember?

Look - I spoke with Alfons yesterday from Veterans for 911 truth - honestly, I cannot prove anything. I cannot prove that I saw a document stating the scenarios for our exercise. I cannot remember the name of the officer that told me and about 8 other people there was an order for NORAD to stand down. I cannot prove either of those things - but I heard them with my own ears. You know excuse the fuck out of me for not remembering to bring in my recorder - oh wait - or my digital camera.

My point is that we all know something about 911 isn’t right. Lots of things are not right. I agree 190% (now you'll probably ask, "why doesnt he agree 200% - he must be a fake")

I'm absolutely convinced there are mis-info agents in this blogger and this will be the last time I log on to it. I refuse to be subjected to negative energy - I will tell you the same I told James Bennett from (Screw Loose Change), who asked me to clairify his points about my letter - I will use my energy only for the positive. Just like Mother Theresa said "Do not invite me to an anti-war protest, because it still supports war. I'll gladly attend a peace rally anytime" Thought manifests our reality, and I always keep my thoughts positive. I will not battle for my character, my friends and family know the man I am - and thats all that matters to me. I think that military people who know things will see what you have tried to do to me, and shun away from coming forward. As even now I am having second thoughts.

DZ posted this on the "front page" last week. the jury is still out as to whether or not this "Chavez" guy is legit or disinfo. Alex Jones and Paul J. Watson have a nice follow-up from DZ's post HERE

The source for the following write-up can be found HERE

Has anyone bothered to call this "Chavez" guy yet?

Developing...

***

U.S. MILITARY SGT GOES PUBLIC:
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY ORDERED U.S. AIR FORCE TO "STAND-DOWN" DURING THE ATTACKS OF 9-11
GIVES EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT OF WHAT WENT ON INSIDE U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND AT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE. AS PLANES HIT WTC
RELEASES DETAILS OF TOP SECRET MILITARY DRILLS WHICH TOOK PLACE THAT DAY - SAYS THEY WERE COVER FOR ATTACKS!

I felt it necessary to follow up to a recent story that was published in Cincinnati Post. It was titled "1 in 3 believe 9-11 conspiracy theory."

I must admit that at first I was overwhelmed with joy that our local paper was actually starting to have real journalism and talk about real issues. Then I read the story and it was a total debunk to make the actual people around the world who feel there was something not right about 9-11, to look like over reacting conspiracy theorists.

Left Gatekeepers: "Silence is Betrayal"
Written by Chris Rose

It's getting harder and harder to be a "left gatekeeper". The Hugo Chavez story is a good case in point. Notice how tentative the "progressive" media were about jumping on the Rangel Pelosi band wagon.

While many of these gatekeepers are "adept at playing the public mind", they do so while knowing and to a certain degree, suppressing the truth within their own minds. It's kind of like the habitual liar who starts to believe their own B.S. It becomes harder to keep track of the actual truth. Here, the progressive media have implicitly "agreed" to remain collectively silent on the "9/11 Truth" issue.

So when a story like "Chavez calling Bush the devil" breaks, the progressives tend to sit back for awhile to see how the story is being played by the MSM. Remember, they kept "silent" on Chavez when he was ranting about Bush and his involvement in 9/11 only a few days prior. How can they possibly comment on the "Chavez called Bush the devil" story without simultaneously revealing themselves to be hypocrites? Keeping in mind the fact that the truth of the first story (Bush and 9/11) tends to prove the truth of the follow-up story ("Bush is the devil"). "Oh what a tangled web" indeed. This phenomenon is not unlike that of trying to avoid stepping in one's own B.S.

Is Chavez a Rogue "Thug" or Brilliant Strategist?
Written by Chris Rose

I was eager to see what Hugo Chavez would have to say to the world, during his recent speech at the United Nations. I did not know what he would say, but I knew he was not going to allow himself to be ignored. If that indeed was his objective (to not be ignored), he certainly succeeded.

Weeks prior to his UN "El Diablo" moment, Chavez was making a little news for calling George Bush something other than "The Devil", he was calling him a terrorist. In fact, Mr. Chavez accused George Bush of being the worst kind of domestic terrorist when he implicated him directly for being behind the 9/11 attacks on his own country. But again, that story made "some" news, but it wasn't front page headline news. Not like his comments at the UN are. Mr. Chavez is being viciously lambasted for having the audacity to refer to the United States Commander and Chief as "The Devil"! It's almost funny! In fact, I think Chavez even scored a few world leader chuckles for the remark during his speech.

I find it especially interesting and quite dissappointing (although no longer surprising) to watch how the Democrat "leadership" is now joining the chorus of those condemning Mr. Chavez' remarks. Rangel and Pelosi have been particularly vociferous in their outrage. Rangel apparently angry at Chavez for having the temerity to come to "my country" and "my district" and call "my President" names. Give me a break Charlie! That's the kind of outrage you should have demonstrated when "your President" came into "your district" after 9/11 and told everybody it was okay to breathe pulverized asbestos! And Pelosi, puhleeze! Her criticism of Chavez calling the President names lost credibility right after she then called Chavez a name. Oh yeah, call my President "The Devil"? Well you're "a Thug"! Real grown up Nancy. Talk about "do as I say, not as I do". Pelosi would have done better to issue a "I know you are but what am I" statement and being done with it. So all of this non-sense got me to thinking... is this perhaps what Senor Chavez intended?

READ ARTICLE: HERE

Here's my take...

This is a brave and bold piece of journalism. As such, Raw Story has made this its headline item. Concurrently, Drudge has as his headline "The Pope Must Die: Says Muslims".

Think about that for a minute. An article written by Nafeez Ahmed, no less, is published that purports to blow the lid off of one of the largest cross-continental "homeland security" anti-terror initiatives, credibly exposing it as nothing more than a lie. A multinational lie between the U.S. and Great Britain (with Israel playing a collateral role)... and how does the MSM respond????

QUCK!!! WE NEED A MAJOR DIVERSION!!!

Enter Drudge: "The Pope Must Die: Says Muslim"

Meanwhile, as it's headline, CNN.com is running a story about a baby snatcher that looks like some weird John Mark Karr/Michael Jackson love child (Boyyy they are pulling out all stops!!!)

Pagan posted this clip a few days ago. There were only a few comments on it. Please take a look:
http://www.911eyewitness.com/truth/downloads/northtowercomplete.wmv

Now compare the flashes to this video of an acknowledged controlled demolition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL3zIv7LdZQ

Do you see what I see!?!?

This is perhaps the clearest visual evidence of explosives going off as the tower collapses. You can clearly see the charges. Also note how the spires disentegrate after the tower has already fallen.

Is this why Bush is suddenly talking about the terrorist capabilities to plant bombs in U.S. buildings? Please view the video and share your thoughts.