Explosive Interview on Louder Than Words Radio: Tomorrow Night
Dylan Avery sent us an email inviting everyone to tune in for an explosive interview from a WTC 7 survivor tomorrow night. Dylan pointed us to the following blog entry:
Explosive interview!
Tomorrow on LTW Radio we're gonna broadcast clips from an interview we conducted last Tuesday before we headed to Bonnaroo.
Btw, many many thanks to Travis of SCI for hooking us up.
You've seen him before, in a news interview widely disseminated on the web, but you've never heard from him since. Until now.
He was working in WTC7 on 9/11. And he saw and experienced things that drive a giant nail through the coffin of the official story.
Dylan assures us this will be well worth a listen.
LTW Radio is on GCN Live.
http://www.gcnlive.com, Network 4,
8 PM to 10 PM Eastern
- Login to post comments
I Like the sound of this... Please make sure it's archived on...
911podcasts.com :-))
We need a positive boost... This sounded quite mouth watering...
"he saw and experienced things that drive a giant nail through the coffin of the official story."
Good luck and best wishes
Not to be cynical, but how
Not to be cynical, but how many times has someone with a "bombshell" turned out to be phony?
Sam Danner anyone?
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
Hey...
Put some ketchup and mustard on those words, because you'll be eating them tomorrow night.
;)
I wouldn't make a big deal out of this if I wasn't confident in its accuracy.
Also...for the record...Sam Danner initially came to us, and we declined to publicize his story.
who's sam danner?
who's sam danner?
Trying to keep on blog topic... but
Sam Danner was someone who pretended to be at the Pentagon on 9/11 and saw a Global Hawk strike it...
It turned out that he was making it all up...
You can see the story at the old LC forums...
Link : http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?act=ST&f=19&t=7703
Hope that explains
Best wishes
Thanks for the info
I heard about this fake witness statement at the Pentagon, but did not know the "witness" name. An interesting question: who would be motivated to make up fake stories like this...? Who's interests does this serve to promote claims that turn out to be false/misleading (i.e. disinformation)? Not one single person has ever claimed a global hawk at the Pentagon, besides this fake witness to my knowledge. Not everything is fake, and not everything is solid evidence just because it "disproves" the official story.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
why would someone whos main
why would someone whos main area of research is to prove that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon initially say that he didnt talk to a single witness because he "didnt have time" and then change his answer to "they would all be unreliable, so i'll stick with ONLY their initial statements"?
http://www.911blogger.com/node/9083#comment
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8953#comment
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA
Why does someone
repeat the same questions over and over when I've already answered them:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/9285#comment-151023
Why don't you do something constructive, like actually showing me some real evidence within the testimony that is worth investigation or is significantly contradictory. My main area of research is not the Pentagon, I have an interest in all areas relating to 9/11, including thermate, controlled demolition, and other areas.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
to be honest, its not that
to be honest, its not that you outright lied that bothers me so much(the lie really wasnt that big a deal), its the fact that a guy who does so much research on the Pentagon trying to prove that Flight 77 hit wouldnt feel the need to even TRY and interview a single witness. the makers of The Pentacon did because they were not afraid of what the answers might be. is that your reason?
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA
I didn't lie
And the fact that you keep claiming that I do is offensive. Believe it or not, I had more than one reason why I didn't contact the witnesses, as I explained several times. Instead you have to resort to calling me a liar.
So in your eye it's NOT a lie to claim "there is no contradictory evidence"? That's the point of my review. If you can't grasp that point then you are a WASTE of my time. Claiming that there is no contradictory evidence ANYWHERE is FALSE. Do I need to interview the witnesses to show this point? NO. Did I resort to calling the flimmakers liars for ignoring this evidence? Nope. Unlike some people I actually have class.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
you changed your answer when
you changed your answer when confronted, parse words all you want but where i come from thats a lie. what was your motivation? thats for others to decide. i dont want to argue, you go in circles anyway. i'll just tell people to click the links i provided and read for themselves and come their own conclusions. why wouldnt you want to interview the witnesses? not even one? in your line of work(the pentagon)? it makes no sense at all. unless of course you were afraid that the previous answers that fit your views of what happened at the Pentagon might have changed based on various factors. keep selling the official story though, because they need your help, what with their multi-billion dollar propaganda operation that is our media selling us that same story endlessly. that "honey pot" that you work so hard to rip apart has only recruited god knows how many into our ranks. thats not to say that we should be pushing bad evidence just because it works, but i just dont see the government coming out with video of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon anytime soon. or ever. and you stay classy.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA
lets throw out ALL eyewitness accounts...
...from all aspects of 9/11, and focus ONLY on the physical evidence, the laws of physics, and those things not debatable or open to "opinion" and "spin", then we would truly get to the heart of all of these matters, and end the silly arguments that invade all aspects of 9/11. Imho you dont need any witness accounts to prove that the OCT is physically impossible. I realized this early on, hence my sig quote.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB
I think you're being hypocritical here
So you're saying it's not possible to have more than one reason? I'm not going to keep explaining what I have already explained.
But it is clear that you are being hypocritical. If you can accuse me of being dishonest, what about the fact that the PentaCon IGNORES the fact that their own witnesses said it hit the Pentagon and say there is no contradictory evidence? Even their OWN witness CONTRADICT THEMSELVES. It is IMPOSSIBLE for the plane to hit the Pentagon AND fly NORTH of the Gas station. So what basis do they have to say there is NO contradictory evidence when their own witnesses contradict themselves?
And you are going around harassing me by calling me a liar. Well you're a hypocrite. What about the fact that this film claims there is NO CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE? So what if I didn't contact the witnesses. The fact that they claim there is NO contradictory evidence is IRRESPONSIBLE. I don't object to the fact their witnesses claim what they say. I object to the fact that they claim there is NO contradictory evidence. I don't need to phone 100 witnesses who left reports in the media to show that there IS contrary evidence. I've wasted enough of my time trying to explain this to you. Obviously you can believe whatever you want to believe, and I don't really care quite frankly. I'm not particularly someone who wants to go hurling accusations and creating divisiveness among the activists.
Did I go around throwing insults and name calling at the people who made this film? No I did not. Not even after they called me insane and a liar. Amazingly, this guy calls me a liar before I even SHOW HIM the testimony!! What the HELL is that? Tell this guy on a forum I have contrary evidence and he says I'm a liar! And for my trouble making this review I'm THE LIAR? If I knew I was going to get all of this CRAP, I wouldn't even have MADE this review.
How does name calling change the fact that not one single witness has come forward to CLAIM that there was a plane that flew OVER the Pentagon. If these people can find one, that's GREAT, good for them. But they HAVE NOT.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
come on Dylan, give us a
come on Dylan, give us a clue. does he work for an alphabet agency?
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA
I'm a ketchup addict, and
I'm a ketchup addict, and don't care much for mustard.
That said, I will gladly eat those words after tomorrow. You know that.
I'm patiently waiting...
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
Danner
When i found out Danner had admitted he was lying i did some searching on him.
It seems he said the following on a web board
(about ham radio and first responders)
before he ever got involved with 9/11
"I am VERY involved with Homeland Security"
So i asked his son if i could talk to him or to clarify this.
He never did.
His son did admits he was a ham radio operator though.
more here...
http://911review.org/Media/Victory_Bollyn.html
http://brad.team8.googlepages.com/danner-bollyn
to me the whole thing was a setup
to discredit the 9/11 movement
=================
THiS is his call sign.
-Ham Radio Operator.
http://www.google.com/search?&q=N3MPE
tis is where he states he is with Homeland Security
http://www.weathermatrix.net/members/public.php3?o=WEATHERWATCH
===================
Dont just think outside the box.
Think like there never was one.
Brad
911review.org
btw...
LTW Radio is on GCN Live.
http://www.gcnlive.com, Network 4, 8 PM to 10 PM Eastern
Thanks Dylan...
Looking forward to it...
How was the trip to "Bonnaroo" ?
Best wishes
It was a very badly needed
It was a very badly needed vacation.
And now I'm back to work. :)
Was anyone promoting 9/11 Truth out there?
Huge festival like that... Golden opportunity. Did we make a showing, or no?
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
SCI?
Is that Michael Travis from String Cheese Incident that Dylan noted?
Maybe im wrong but he did say 'Bonnaroo' and 'SCI' in the same entry
You got it. Him and Jason,
You got it.
Him and Jason, the percussionist, are huge Loose Change fans. In fact, during a Q&A with SCI on Saturday, someone asked what their stance is on activism, and Travis blurted out at one point, much to the crowd's shock, that "everything started going downhill the day the government brought the Towers down..."
hey dylan
....how are plans coming along to have LCFC released in the UK ?
Question:
When people talk to you about 9/11, do you ever suggest that they look at some of the videos available online featuring people like DRG, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, Steven E. Jones, Michel Chossudovsky... You know, the longer academic lecture style videos? I really appreciate what you guys have done with LC (it was one of the first films that really got me questioning), but the earlier versions were pretty speculative and contained some "errors". These longer lectures by qualified intellectuals really provide unimpeachable credibility, and I think we should also be getting people to do deeper homework. Maybe suggest these types of clips as follow up to LC?
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
loose change is best
ive found loose change works the best, people who know nothing want to be entertained, seeing a lecture is very dull, plus loose change has got real great. visual evidence that cant be in lectures, although there is speculation (cleveland) besides that the coincidences the film piles up along with its watchability is the best way to begin.
Making an undebunkable movie is almost impossible, all criminal investigations begin with a mix of coincidences and hard evidence, although i do agree the cleveland part should be omitted and replaced with some more quotes from stephen jones/griffin papers , other than that its a great film
Well said billybipbip...
Loose Change is still my no. 1 9/11 documentary, it was fearless... even taking into consideration a few minor errors and a bit of speculation...
The 1st and 2nd edition both rocked and I cannot wait for the final cut.
There are some great presentations out there too by Kevin Ryan, David Ray Griffin, Professor Jones, Mike Berger, Peter Dale Scott, Webster Tarpley, Dan Abrahamson plus loads of others including Pilots for 9/11 Truth etc... All of these supplement the science and reason for the press for 9/11 truth.
Best wishes to all
Thanks for the input
but the question wasn't "What do you guys think works best?". It was "Do you ever promote scholarly lecture videos", and it was directed specifically at enigs.
------------------
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine
what works best
what 'works' best sounds quite Rovian. One would think the Truth should come first?
LC is way too speculative for my tastes. I never recommend it and offer harsh criticism when asked about it by those not too informed about the 9/11 attacks. It would reflect poorly on me if I were to recommend such a specious film. I generally refer people to "Everybody's gotta learn sometime", its not so much a limited hangout like 9/11 Press for Truth and it is generally based on solid evidence (unlike LC).
Save it, please
I will try to listen to all of it, but it would be nice if we could get a transcript, an online recording or podcast, or if one of us listeners could report out what that "giant nail" is.
Hoka hey.
Barry Jennings finally recovered from his 'amnesia'?
This should be interesting.
Podcast or similar ?
Yes a podcast or similar would be great - I'm on the other end of the planet and the time difference means I'll probably miss it.
Getting to the point.
What's with the suspense and teaser of an un-named man with a giant nail? That seems a bit theatrical and show business-like to me. With a subject of grave importance such as Sept. 11th, I'd like to see people put the information out when they get it and save the sales tactics for some other endeavor.
Who is the guy. What is his story? Thanks.
And please post the interview clip after tomorrow's show.
Peace.
...
agreed!!
feels like show-business a-la Alex Jones to me.
ditto. /////////////////////
ditto.
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
the gcn show is free
so what are they selling here?
the info will be available tonight at 8pm e, listen in.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB