Blogads

Blogads

Asbestos Dangers



Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.

FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.

Get the news, get the facts.

User login

RSS Feeds


Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox


Comparison Video - The Planned Demolition of the WTC

( Home » blogs » GazeboflossUK's blog » Comparison Video -... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by GazeboflossUK on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 9:19am.
| | |


SLIGHTY BETTER QUALITY DOWNLOAD CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE = http://www.sendspace.com/file/deiled

A video that compares aspects of well known, 'obvious' building demolitions with the almost hidden ones of WTC 1 & 2 on September 11th 2001. I say almost because ANYONE can watch this video and see it for themselves.

See hundreds of demolition charge flashes before and during the implosions of the towers.

Watch as huge horizontal blasts eject steel and concrete far below the collapsing section.

Its clear cut folks....those towers were absolutely laced with demo charges, fact.

And that creates all sorts of horrible thoughts....

We must expose the 9/11 Inside Job...for the victims, their families, subsequent war deaths and for everyone on this planet.

Thanks to the video "9/11: The Explosive Reality" - which inspired me to put this little video together.

Gareth.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Great work and video post!!!

Great work and video post!!! I can't see what else those flashes can be other than finely timed charges. They surely not materials reflecting from the sun. That was enthralling and so refreshing to watch. What beats me is why wasn't these flashes picked up on before in detail. This is big. Go and look at wtc7 for any too.

Submitted by i sick of lies ... on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 1:26pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

They are cutter charges alright....

I mean, there are materials that are white in colour (paper etc..) that are falling and you can see them....BUT there is an obvious difference in colour and in flight between the two.........and those flashes during the fall look exactly like those seen long before. You can see the charges hugging the falling steel. It's mind blowing.

Glad you approve of the video, too.

http://myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic

Submitted by GazeboflossUK on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 1:26pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

WTC7 - Bright White Flashes...

I observed these around 12 months ago when I got hold of the Naudet DVD...

During the 6.5 second near free-fall speed total collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC7), you can see several very bright white flashes that look identical to those that correspond to cutter charge explosives used in controlled demolitions, i.e. the 34th floor towards the western edge.

Looking at the the northern face of WTC7, several brief bright white flashes are visible towards the western edge during the collapse of world trade center building 7.

I made a short clip to show this (see below)...


Link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0vq-r0NM4g

---

It is much clearer in the larger XviD (10MB) version, which can be downloaded at :

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=I1F3I5L7

---

Best wishes

Submitted by 911veritas on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 7:02pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

I've reported some of them

I've reported some of them in detail before. I don't have the ability make videos but I cited the archive's and the time at which one could see them. I'm not the first either I'm sure. Thanks to those with video editing skills ;) !

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)
OIL IS OBSOLETE - WAKE UP - YOU'VE BEEN LIED TO, AGAIN!
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/

Submitted by Whitey on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 1:29am.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Flashes

Though I don't doubt CD at all for 9/11, I am uncertain about some of this footage showing flashes where no one else has seen them. Much as I would love for this footage to be "clean", I suspect the hand of Photoshop in many cases. Caveat emptor.

Submitted by 7man on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 1:34pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

"I am uncertain about some of this footage..."

"I am uncertain about some of this footage showing flashes where no one else has seen them"
Agreed. This was my first thought when I watched "Explosive Reality", how come we have never seen this before?
I am not saying the videos are fake, but the possibility exists that they can be. We have to stay aware of these classic disinfo tactics.

Hopefully the source video can can be independently verified
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Submitted by CattleRustler on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 5:36pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

ditto

There are hours and hours of footage all over so I'm sure it will be easy to do a side by side and see if they are there or not. I suspect they are there and that, initially, you aren't looking for them so the flashes seem like part of the video (artifacts or pixalation) but if you actually looking for them...you notice they are more abnormal then normal footage quality related issues.

What's with the 'subliminal red-flashes segment' at the end of the full length version of this video? That seems added in to me.
Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

Submitted by jpass on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 5:57pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

I checked

I've checked the footage....and they flashes are indeed there.

http://myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic

Submitted by GazeboflossUK on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 6:28pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Can flashes be seen in other earlier documentaries

that use news footage, like loose change or some of the other earlier films?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Submitted by CattleRustler on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 6:51pm.
» login to post comments | 0 points

The molten steel & the demolition wave...

(starting just below the impact area) as the demolition commences are all I need to see, regardless if the flashes are faked or not. You can clearly see the building being pulverized.

Submitted by Big_D on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 7:01pm.
» login to post comments | 2 points

no, we know that

the question isnt "was the wtc a controlled demolition", we know that already. The question is: "Is this footage 'enhanced', or is it real?"
Thats a very important question.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Submitted by CattleRustler on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 7:23pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

The Archive Footage is the same.....

The Archive footage backs up the cutter charge flashes.

Also, even in my own, personal (worse quality) clips of that day you can see these charges going off before and during the collapse of the towers.

I honestly never really noticed them until recently. And since I've been looking at this for 4-5 years I think that's pretty amazing....

I guess I still was suffering a little bit from 9/11 blindness Syndrome..

Now, I can't NOT seen them.

It's amazing. And very compelling.

http://myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic

Submitted by GazeboflossUK on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 8:41pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Important: Veritas, Arie, and others:

Veritas, Arie, and others:
1) How many different "collapse" videos are there?
2) How many of these were shown on the air before they went into circulation?
3) Is it possible that all of these videos, network and freelance were collected and touched up before they were shown on TV (to remove most of the flashes)?

Let's say that each video had a "collapse" time of 15 seconds x 30 frames/sec. = 450 frames. Is it within the realm of possibility that a small team of editors and a lot of coke could edit this footage prior to putting on the air? I have never considered this possibilty before, thinking that the networks rushed to get out the news ASAP. How can this archival footage be authenticated in a systematic fashion? Please post an answer to my inquiry.

Submitted by 7man on Sun, 06/03/2007 - 11:27pm.
» login to post comments | 1 point

More flashes & explosions

More explosions:
The Ulimate Con
http://youTube.com/watch?v=q7aRR9FGGJc

More flashes:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4837634583766795751

Great vid, thanks!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://TruthSeeker.us

Submitted by chucksheen on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 1:46am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

Most of the squibs and puffs that precede the collapses

of the Towers, were either across the tops of the mechanical floors or down the center lines of the buildings. This is exactly where you would expect to see these puffs, if this was a CD. Otherwise these puffs would have been more randomly distributed.

When you understand how the buildings were constructed and where the mechanical floors are and other significant features, it is apparent that whoever brought these buildings down, knew a lot about their construction and exactly where the building has to be 'cut' in order to bring it down.

I do believe, that the reason why WTC 1 was hit higher up and a messier collapse was because they had to make adjustments in order to drop the antenna properly.

Submitted by DoYouEverWonder on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 3:40am.