www.northtexansfor911truth.com

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77
pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 12, 2007 - s (165 ratings)

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter 2: Flight of American 77
pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 28, 2007 - (22 ratings)

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following ... all » the ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4648624627192508186

Pandora's Black Box -Chapter Two- Flight Of American 77 p2
nine11Revolution - 32 min - Jan 17, 2007 -
(19 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following ... Alle » ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33xszThkz_s

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (trailer)
johndoeXLC - 3 min - Nov 15, 2006 - (18 ratings)
... Pandora's Black Box - Flight of American 77 based on Air Traffic Control, Radar and the Black Box. The First part of the series, Pandora's Black Box - ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_brTPDJTs8

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two (trailer)
johndoeXLC - 3 min - Jan 2, 2007 - small full starsmall full starsmall half starsmall empty starsmall empty star (55 ratings)
Trailer for upcoming film - Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77. http://pilotsfor911truth.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yojJhxoL1ag

AA Flight 77 Data Recorder pt1-Pandora's Black Box
uneedhelp - 10 min - Jan 22, 2007 - (11 ratings)
AA Flight 77 Data Recorder pt1- Flight Of American Airlines 77
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZHLk8CyP6g

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77
nine11Revolution - 33 min - Jan 17, 2007 - (22 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs5ax_r0Zn8

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (New 9/11 docu).avi
http://pilotsfor911truth.org - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 13, 2007 star (31 ratings)
Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 http://pilotsfor911truth.org Pentagon Sept11 9/11 flight 93 conspiracy theory infowars
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1809159567446839479

Pandora's Black Box: Flight of American 77
Pilots For 9/11 Truth - 1 hr 5 min - Jan 22, 2007 - (16 ratings)
Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-44862351366604505

Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 (trailer)
BlogginForTheTruth - 3 min - Jan 13, 2007 - star (7 ratings)
... Pandora's Black Box - Flight of American 77 based on Air Traffic Control, Radar and the Black Box. The First part of the series, Pandora's Black Box - ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY28NJ_mLxw

I think we should be careful with any evidence that the government supplies. The 'five frames' and the black box data come from the government. Both were in the hands of the government for weeks and months before release to the public.

Do people here agree that this alone renders those two sources of evidence suspect? That's how I view it.

Why base theories on such suspect evidence? To me it looks as though these two pieces of evidence, which contradict each other, are meant to confuse.

that the government is factually contradicting its own reports.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is simply pointing this out and seeking official government clarification.

If we had a truly non-corrupt and independent news media the headlines across the country would read:

GOVERNMENT REPORT SHOWS FLIGHT 77 DID NOT HIT PENTAGON !

This is the best way to point out to the general public that we have not been told the truth and need REAL investigations.

Their (Pilots for 9/11Truth) careful and methodical approach provides a solid foundation from which we can question the government myth and highlight its obvious problems. Since the government controls all of the physical evidence, our only truly credible (legitimate) way to dispute their claims (aside from the physics at the WTC) is to use the information and reports (FBI, FEMA, NIST, NTSB, etc) they provide to prove that the government myth is false.

It is an unfortunate side-effect that this also fuels rampant speculation, which only weakens our public campaign, imo.

(btw - this info fits with my working theory regarding the Pentagon, LOL@myself)

Many truthers suspect that the government intentionally created, and continues to maintain, ambiguity about the event at the Pentagon to keep the movement divided, waste our time and energy and give the msm, which they control, a quick and easy issue to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth movement with. I'd say that strategy has worked pretty well for them so far, wouldn't you?

No worries, we are growing every day and getting more information every week and they are getting more desperate and starting to make tactical mistakes.

The truth marches on!

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

We will need your help to distrbute this release. I have compiled a list of mainstream media emails and will be distributing it tomorrow. I will also be on the Meria Heller show tomorrow.

Spread it far and wide.

Cheers!
Rob Balsamo
http://pilotsfor911truth.org
http://forums.pilotsfor911truth.org

That's cool..........It's getting it into the mainstream that's the challenge
A big thanks to pilotsfor911truth.

flight known as AA-77 was a real flight, and/or that it was anywhere near the Pentagon on 9/11!

For example, how could Hani Hanjour have flown it back 250 miles from Ohio & even find the Pentagon?

or Atta or anyone else. The plane (AA77 or a duplicate) was simply flown over the pentagon either by remote or by a military pilot. At the same time prepositioned explosives in/around the pentagon were set off, while either a missle, or a small unmanned aircraft (a3 skywarrior or global hawk) was crashed into the pentagon.

thats one theory

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics/Science/Mathematics do not lie, only people do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB

Pilots do not fly planes anymore. Most modern commercial airplanes are flown by the on-board Flight Management System (FMS) from takeoff to landing, inclusive. (and sometimes taxiiing, as well)

The pilot and copilot are only there in case of emergencies.

Everything is electronic (electro-mechanical) and computerized. (i.e., no more physical wires connecting yokes and peddles and rudders and such -- they use electronic servos with hydraulic assist and things like that)

And it is merely a matter of a few small electronic and/or computer program modifications to make it impossible to turn off the FMS and have complete control over the airplane.

----
Ad hominem per factum, beyotch!
You are undeservedly egotistical.... often laughably so.
Pseudo-intellectuality does not behoove you.

overthrown the FMS & flown the plane back to the Pentagon?

There's a switch to do that. Or reprogram it.

However, it does kind of kill (no pun intended) the whole "Hani Hanjour (or whatever his name is) not being a good enough pilot to fly the plane" 'theory'. All he really had to do was know how to "program" (enter values into) the FMS. Although why he would program it to fly to the Pentagon and then have it do that big circle before it crashes is a wonderment.

I am of the opinion that someone took control of the plane's FMS system via remote control and disabled the ability to turn it off and programmed it to do what it did. (beforehand someone would have had to mess with it to allow this to be done)

I do not think Flight 77's pilot would have allowed them to take control of the plane away from him, unless they killed him or disabled him, but supposedly, from what the [liar] said his wife supposedly told him when she called him from the plane, that did not occur.

----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief Correspondent

http://www.chico911truth.org/

LOL
___________________
Together in Truth!

how fast was Flight 77 supposed to have been going when it allegedly hit the Pentagon again? anyway, are you going to include the people that claim to have seen a "business jet" or a smaller "12 or so person jet" in your analysis or only those that support Flight 77 hitting? also, will you include the fact that many if not most of the eyewitnesses have direct ties to the military and the MSM(mainly USA Today) in your analysis?

For the record there are only 4 statements of a small plane.

Out of hundreds of statements.

And they were all from farther away from the crash site. For example, from an apartment.

Don't worry, I will look at and consider ALL of the anomalies. Including the "missile" controversy.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

i think its only fair that you provide the occupation of the "eyewitnesses" you use to bolster your case though. i think its pretty relevant here. many people will have a hard time trusting the words of military people and media types. i wont even get into the history of the CIA and USA Today. lets just say its called the CIA's favorite paper for a reason and an unusually high number of their reporters were the "eyewitnesses".

Out of hundreds of statements.

Do all those hundreds state that they saw the plane hit, as you
state above?

But to give you an idea

Approximately 100 people saw the plane hit the Pentagon.  Even more saw the plane of course.  I have about 40 statements from that claiming that the plane went completely into the building.  This would explain why there is not much debris outside of the pentagon.

ZERO saw it miss.  No one.  Everyone who described the color of the plane called it “silver”.  Everyone confirms the plane was flying "very low".   I have over 20 statements confirming multiple traffic jams.  The traffic next to the Pentagon was "stand-still".  Take a look at google maps to see the highways right next to the Pentagon.  From these traffic jams the plane flew over and struck light poles.  The sound of the plane was described as “very loud to deafening”.  There are almost no statements of a “quiet” plane.

A few people described the plane as sounding like a missile.  Two described missile sounds without seeing what happened.  No one saw a missile.

I am going through every single statement and marking it up to prove that I am not missing anything.  I think there are around 200 statements total. 

The testimony comes from two large collections that I have combined, and I've found some more statements that I have also included to form the largest collection of Pentagon statements.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

???????
now i know, somethings are not liked to talk about here ;-)

Unlikely that anyone would "see" a missile as they can travel many times faster than an airliner.

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/SeanManning.shtml

There is no sane reason to fly a plane OVER the pentagon after taking so long to reach it and then fake the damage.

There a plenty of sane reasons to do it - make people think a plane hijacked by Arabs hit the Pentagon, without having to worry about plane debris outside the Pentagon that would inevitably remain in large amounts, and would make it hard to hide that the plane was not Flight 77. What this means is that it would be crazy to fly any plane other than Flight 77 into the building, because it would leave evidence.

What you seem to be saying is that it would be too easy to detect a flyover so therefore they would be too crazy to do it that way. That's an open question for me.

Even at 300 to 400 feet altitude, there would have been a pretty strong draft that would have caused the fireball and smoke to be noticeably pulled up over the Pentagon in the direction of the plane's flight, and that was not seen in any of the 3 released videos. (unless they were all highly modified and special effects-created rather than images of the real explosion, which is always a possibility)

----
Ad hominem per factum, beyotch!
You are undeservedly egotistical.... often laughably so.
Pseudo-intellectuality does not behoove you.