as well as leave a comment... gives it more "juice" for the rankings

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

....uses the phrase "catastrophic attack" at the 4:42 mark?

Words that would have special resonance in the years to come...as the PNAC RAD document gained fame....

Was that part of the script too?

I guess it was too early to use "catalyzing"....

Could something be done about this? Would having an effective search function be expensive?

Use the "Google tab for Search only on 9/11blogger" and use keywords to highlight what you are looking for.

To find things on 9/11 blogger it is very effective to use "tracker"

For example, click on a user name (such as your own) and then click on "track" it gives you a list of all of the blogs you have commented in.

here is your track: http://www.911blogger.com/user/1191/track

tracker is also very useful because it will tell you if there are new comments from the last time you viewed the blog if you are logged in.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

The main tracker page is a very good way to see at a glance which topics are generating the most discussion, and how recently.

The main tracker page is my 911Blogger home page. From there, you see the news, the blogs and where the latest discussions are taking place.

I have used the tracker to see what is being discussed.

However, when I click "My recent posts", it takes me to my own blog entries, not to my latest comments.

I went through several tracker pages, but my name didn't show up on any of them so that I could have clicked on it and then clicked on "track". I'm sure it would have turned up *eventually*, but...

Sorry for being so thick-headed -- am I missing something?

Wouldn't it be user-friendly to have a tracker button "my latest comments" so that one wouldn't have to search for one's name on the tracker pages first?

If I can click on your user name and go to "track" and see all of your comments on different blogs, you should be able to see it. It should work.

Or click "my account", "track" and you should see all of the blogs you have commented in.

http://www.911blogger.com/user/1191/track

You can always just bookmark this link if you want to keep going back to it.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Ok, so on the tracker page I have to

1) click "My recent posts" (which takes me to the "recent posts for Vesa" page)

2) click my name in the author column on that page (which in turn conjures up the "track" tab)

3) click the "track" tab (which shows the list of blogs in which I have participated)

That is two steps more than would be necessary for normal everyday comment tracking (cf. my previous comment), but I guess I can live with that. (Did anyone guess I enjoy doing usability testing at work? ;-))

Nunyabiz:

"Use the 'Google tab for Search only on 9/11blogger' and use keywords to highlight what you are looking for."

That's precisely what I had been doing with poor results.

Thanks to all who replied.

WTC7 the Smoking Gun of 9/11

Where did that come from?

www.northtexansfor911truth.com

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6602

that is a bloody good video. btw how many people died as a direct result of wtc7 coming down?

Only 1, or maybe zero. I've heard reports that a SS agent was in there when it came down. I've not yet memorized his name.

I'm sure others here can give you the evidence for (or against) this 1 death.

Want to figure out 9/11? Ponder the 9/11 "Mineta Stone"

I agree Jon.

I get voted down every time I say this, but this story isn't a big deal and actually helps out the debunkers.

People are looking at things from post-research on 9/11.

Going back to that day, on 9/11/01, not too many people were saying,
"Of course WTC7 won't come down, its a steel structure building and no building like that has ever come down until the twin towers which were hit by airplanes".

What it means is, a hell of a lot of people thought WTC 7 was in danger of coming down. And they were perfectly reasonable in thinking that.

The fact that WTC 7 came down isn't the smoking gun. The smoking gun is HOW WTC 7 came down (which NIST still can't explain).

Get voted down for having a legitimate question.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

I am getting voted down in this thread. All the way through. This "Miss Congeniality" contest gets harder and harder. I'll have to remember, legitimate questions and concerns are bad, following the choir, blindly, is good.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

you are justifying that a major news channel can make up future news because they think it might happen:?

thats insane! and its just as insane to think that anyone could have predicted that a steel building was going to collapse .

What's being said is that because of the damage WTC7 received, people assumed it was going to come down, and reported it as such.

BTW... I'm not taking anything away from Veritas911. Certainly, it would be nice to know who originated the report that WTC7 was coming down, and why.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

The BBC and CNN report provides powerful circumstantial evidence that, when considered together with the direct visual evidence of WTC7 being demolished, infers that a conspiracy was concocted to destroy building 7 while simultaneously using the media to make it seem as if the building collapsed of its own accord.

The fact that this would occur directly following the demolition of the two towers is further corroborating evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job.

The story devised to cover the WTC 7 demolition was absurd on its face, thus another conspiracy was concocted after the fact, to bury the live televised news reports because they clearly contradicted not only the visual evidence of WTC 7 being blown up, but the fact that the reports went "live" too soon, also succeeded in completely destroying the time line of events necessary for their story to "hold up" under careful scrutiny.

Of course this careful scrutiny never occurred. The story has since been absolutely censored by the mainstream media and the government at large. So great was the conspiracy to cover-up the demolition of WTC 7, that it was not even mentioned in the official 9/11 Commission Report.

What's so ironic about all of this is, many people point to the Bush Administration's incompetence as "proof" that they were unable to pull off 9/11 as an "Inside Job". It would seem that they were essentially right. Their ineptitude resulted in the smoking gun which is WTC7; thus, they have effectively failed in their attempt to pull this off!

When all the facts are considered together with available direct and circumstantial evidence, it becomes clear that 9/11 was an Inside Job. It can no longer be denied. The only question remaining is, what are we the people going to do about it?

"infers that a conspiracy was concocted to destroy building 7 while simultaneously using the media to make it seem as if the building collapsed of its own accord."

That's an interesting thought, and certainly possible. However, we can't make a leap like that based on the information that we know. If the media was told by Karl Rove that building 7 was going to come down, then yes, absolutely, I would agree with that hypothesis.

We need to know where the report originated from.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton