Details and Preview of Upcoming BBC Episode of 'The Conspiracy Files'

Blogads

Banner Exchange

Details and Preview of Upcoming BBC Episode of 'The Conspiracy Files'

Submitted by admin on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:17am.

Media Coverage

584KB WMV
Sorry for the poor quality, this is
a direct rip from the BBC stream
Update: There is also a short teaser clip available here.

A few new details have come out on the BBC 'The Conspiracy Files' on 9/11 which is to air this Sunday, these come via a blog by the editor:

9/11 questions - bbc.co.uk/blogs

Through the internet and the media generally, allegations of complicity by the US government in the 9/11 attacks are intensifying.

We've just finished a new series called The Conspiracy Files which will start this Sunday on BBC Two at 9pm with a programme about 9/11.

We’ve talked to a number of the people who question the official version.

Dylan Avery, the 23-year-old film-maker behind the internet film Loose Change says the US government “will willingly kill its own citizens for whatever gain it seems necessary and then lie as much as they need to cover it up.”

Alex Jones, a Texan nationally syndicated radio talk show host, tells the programme “9/11 is an inside job… a false-flag terror operation.”

Jim Fetzer, former US marine and retired university professor, who helped found a coalition of academics called Scholars for 9/11 Truth repeats the Sherlock Holmes quotation “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

But we found that simple requests, such as asking to see the plane wreckage of flight United 93 at Shanksville, or flight American Airlines 77 at the Pentagon, were refused after months of delay by the authorities.

Yet if we had been able to film the wreckage from flight AA77 we would have had extremely strong evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.

Trying to prove or disprove these alternative theories is not easy.

Officials are loathe to engage, thinking that any response will only fan the flames of popular conspiracy theories, and yet no response seems to be worse still.

9/11: The Conspiracy Files travels across the United States investigating the allegations and talking to witnesses wherever possible.

Be sure to check out their blog entry for the full details, and to post some comments.

You can find the preview clip here as well~~, however I have had no luck so far in getting it to play. Expect to see a downloadable version of this clip popup as soon as it starts working~~.

Thanks 911veritas for the heads up!

» login to post comments | printer friendly version

» login to post comments | 9 points

No whammies No whammies...

“when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

I hope there isn't mention of the improbable exotic weaponry theory.

Otherwise, this is a pretty fair-minded little blog. I like that they are actually trying to investigate what we're saying. I also like how they mentioned how unwilling the U.S. is to cooperate.

If you have nothing to hide, why do you hide everything?

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Submitted by Jon Gold on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:30am.

» login to post comments | 7 points

Agreed. I'm a little

Agreed. I'm a little apprehensive now, after seeing Mr Fetz raise his ugly head.

However, if this documentary is as good as the preview suggests, this will hopefully prove to be a massive boost for the movement.

The documentary follows one of the most popular - if not, the most poular - shows on UK tv -- Top Gear (8pm - 9pm GMT). A couple of weeks ago it boasted a bigger audience than Big Brother (c. 7.1 million).

Fingers crossed!

I'll get this show recorded and uploaded to google vid and i'll post a link on the almighty blogger as soon afterwards as possible.

Submitted by tiffosi99 on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:13pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

Very cool.

Thank you.

"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Submitted by Jon Gold on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:23pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

Yes

And when pigs fly we will have a new source of cheap transportation.

Sorry to sound sarcastic, but my expectation is that this documentary will be designed to appear serios - but will focus on strawmen theories like the Pentagon and Dr. Fetzer. Just the fact that people watching this documentary might seek out Dr. Fetzer's work on Scholars is a huge liability.

Its like Bill O'Reilly said when he had Dr. Fetzer on:

"I hope people go to your dopey website."

i bet he does

Submitted by John Albanese on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 1:02pm.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Optimism........

surely you've seen the latest NIST report on the flying pig phenomenon?

Joking aside, if this documentary causes 0.1% of its audience to go beyond skepticism and turn to activism, it will have been worthwhile.

I, personally won't learn anything new from it but it will highlight the collapse of building 7 - something that the sheepish majority are still unaware of. Then they have to ask themselves "why didn't I hear about WTC7 before?".

I do agree, though, that the mention of star wars beams and hologram planes will have a negative effect - but hopefully outweighed by the inescapable evidence that Jones and Avery SHOULD be putting forward.

Submitted by tiffosi99 on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 5:23pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

John, right again. This is

John, right again.
This is going to be a major hit piece.
I can't wait to watch it. Alex Jones said it's gonna be bad.

Submitted by card51short on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:16pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Yep. So much for being

Yep. So much for being optimistic - this BBC hit piece won't even mention Northwoods for God's sake.

Submitted by tiffosi99 on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 10:48am.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Cool, I'm going to try and

Cool, I'm going to try and grab it to so we'll have a much better chance of successfully getting it up with the more people that record it.

Submitted by Dem Bruce Lee Styles on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 3:14pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Digg

Digg this story, If u can:

http://www.digg.com/world_news/BBC_Preview_on_9_11_Conspiracy_2_minute_T...

Submitted by sleepy2k23 (not verified) on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 3:58pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

How can we see this documentary en France ?

John A MITCHELL
mouv4x8@club-internet.fr

Bonjour ,

Have asked the BBC on their web site how can we in France see this documentary. Have not yet had a reply. Does any one on this blog have an idea how we the French can see it ?

Thanks for any reply

Yours

John

Submitted by mouv4x8 on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:46am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Chances are

you will be able to find it on Google Video or similar services soon after it has been aired.

Submitted by bruce1337 on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:53am.

» login to post comments | 6 points

I have my fingers crossed

I have my fingers crossed for this, but we all know the outcome already.

People I wish were included in this documentary:
Dr. David Ray Griffin
Bob McIlvaine
William Rodriguez

Submitted by FalseDichotomy on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:51am.

» login to post comments | 9 points

why no DRG?

Why isn't David Ray Griffin included? Anyone paying the least bit of attention knows that he is the most credible.

Fetzer is a crank, maybe a mole, who just happened to be first to establish a "scholars" group.

Submitted by jfal on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:56pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

I actually believe Alex

I actually believe Alex Jones is the most credible. He just gets upset and angry (LIKE HE SHOULD) and people take that as him being crazy for being passionate about something in this world of zombies.
Not to take anything away from DRG. Tarpely and Bowman are certainly high on the list as well.

Submitted by card51short on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 11:18pm.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Alex....

Alex takes away from his credibility when he says that Global Warming is a myth, created by the NWO...

I mean come on Alex...We are all skeptical of the powers that be, but the polar ice caps ARE melting

Submitted by evanswj937 on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 10:16am.

» login to post comments | 6 points

no doubt about it, they have

no doubt about it, they have been going HARD on the "global warming myth" lately. Alex is a patriot but hes clearly no scientist. not that i am either but when 95% of the worlds scientists agree on something i find it kind of hard to disagree with them. and when most of the 5% of scientists that disagree with global warming get their funds traced back to the oil industry it doesnt look so good.

Submitted by Chris on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 10:36am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

You cant blame him

You cant blame Alex for being so paranoid about EVERYTHING... When you find out that so much of what you thought was true is really a lie, its somewhat understandable that he questions EVERYTHING

Submitted by evanswj937 on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 10:42am.

» login to post comments | 0 points

No guys, Alex is right about

No guys, Alex is right about Global Warming, he's not “being paranoid";

The truth about global warming - it's the Sun that's to blame

(1998 Study) Scientists blame sun for global warming

An experiment that hints we are wrong on climate change

Global warming on Mars – without SUVs!

Global Warming Detected on Triton

New Storm on Jupiter Hints at Climate Change

Global Warming on Pluto Puzzles Scientists

Cosmic rays blamed for global warming

MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS POLITICS NOT SCIENCE

The Creeping Fascism of Global Warming Hysteria

Submitted by Dem Bruce Lee Styles on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 11:46am.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Check that, why is anyone

Check that, why is anyone voting this post down? Those are FACTS right there! Wake up! How ironic is this? "Global Warming" is happening but it's not as described by the mainstream media, Tony Blair and Al Gore. IT IS LARGELY THE SUN! PLUTO HAS GLOBAL WARMING! Christ, how can people become aware of one manipulation (9/11) and yet still fall for others? Pathetic.

Submitted by Dem Bruce Lee Styles on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 2:18pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Get past 9/11...

Get past the FRN,

Get past the machinations of an elite always greed-grabbing after the illusion of control through manipulating the people with endless propaganda...

Get past the next ivory-tower destruction and renaissance in science...

Get past the filth and toxic swamp-making by pollution and waste in all forms...

Then get our heads around the implications of a universe simply swimming through a tireless flood of electrical phenomenon and endless symbiotic energy for all. For example: http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/041025paradigm.htm

(Please my fellow truthers, as we here are focused upon 911 and it's immediate tangents for the most part, let's not forget how others are/have already moved on into a new world just waiting for us to complete our task of seeing justice done and returning Truth back upon a pedestal of proper respect. Should we succeed in bringing about a paradigm shift in politics, the terms of war, and the overriding socioeconomics of this part of humanities interactions.... be prepared for the flood of revolutionary information currently being held back by the mud of our paralyzing status quo. Thus, the extraordinary potential of humanity realized afterwards, may serve as our prize for success in surviving our current intellectual poverty.)

Submitted by Erin S. Myers on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 3:14pm.

» login to post comments | -7 points

can't wait to see it.....

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by nothwind on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:10pm.

» login to post comments | 6 points

There were plane parts

There were plane parts recovered at all 3 crash locations. Whether you think there were enough, or whether they were of the right type, etc. is one thing, but the misnomer that there were no plane parts at all is incorrect and is an easily debunkable myth that we do not need to be spreading.

Submitted by FalseDichotomy on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:19pm.

» login to post comments | -11 points

Sorry....

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by nothwind on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 1:59pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Don't plane parts

have serial and part numbers?

Why hasn't a single piece of any of the four planes ever been positively identified, has coming from the type of planes they supposedly came from?

It's not that hard to id parts. Mechanics in every industry do it every day.

Submitted by DoYouEverWonder on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 5:59pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

And why would "they" want to positively identify plane parts...

...when it's so much more effective at keeping us divided to withhold / fudge information on the flights and watch us argue over whether or not there were planes and what kind of planes, et cetera...

The flaw in this plan is that by doing so, "they" also manage to clue in to anyone who's paying attention with less than half a brain that "they" are up to something... Then again maybe "they" want us to think/know they're up to "something" and be unsure and afraid of exactly what - and therefore easier to manipulate?

How tangled is this web, anyways?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Fascism Lite - Now with 75% less mass murder and 25% more public appeal!

Submitted by dissyness on Thu, 02/15/2007 - 2:10pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

9/11 video censored at Google video?

Slightly off topic but very relevant...

This email just came from news@brasschecktv.com and refers the the video posted at this site via google video

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/80.html

--------------------------------

On 2/10/07 I posted "The 9/11 Solution",
and since then our logs show that 19,802
have visited the page and seen the video.

Unfortunately, for reasons not clear, Google Videoremoved the video from their web site last night.

This morning I attempted to upload the video to
YouTube.

It was automatically removed:

"...due to terms of use violation."

I have read the Terms & Conditions of both Google
Video and YouTube and there is nothing in this video
that violates their written terms.

I am the video maker and am sole copyright
owner of the material.

The content is not illegal, an invasion of anyone's
privacy, obscene, an incitement of hate or violence,
or a portrayal of graphic violence.

In short, they had no cause to remove it.

If anyone has specific, detailed, actionable
information on how I can appeal to these
people to stop censoring this video, please
let me know.

Please: No idle speculations, hand wringing
or even expressions of sympathy.

But if you have SPECIFIC experience with Google
and/or YouTube on this kind of a problem and
can point me to exactly who I should contact and
how I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.

What the page looks like now:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/80.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. If you were one of the lucky few who downloaded
the video before it was pulled, please feel free to
distribute it in anyway you want. As the copyright
owner, I authorize you to do this.

If you can point me to the link were you have uploaded
it, all the better.

P.P.S. This has happened at an inopportune time
for me personally. I will not be able to respond
personally to any e-mails for the next five or
six days.

Thanks for all your support.

Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

-----------------------------------------

All aspects of the truth are consistent

Submitted by solar roller on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:27pm.

» login to post comments | 3 points

The video was probably

The video was probably removed because it had footage from NBC or ABC. Both of them have entered into agreements with youtube/google to keep their copyrighted footage from being spread online. This is the same reason why some clips of WTC7 were removed from youtube about 2 months ago.

The creator of that video can't claim copyright (as he does in this email) because he does not own the copyright for the footage he used from other news agencies.

Just another reason why we shouldn't depend on these video sites solely, because they could just scrap it all at once.

Submitted by FalseDichotomy on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 12:35pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Lawyers and the destruction of freedom

These copyright laws are just another attempt to stop the spread of information..... way to go LAWYERS!
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Submitted by JJJames on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 1:05pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Copyright on non commercial video?

nothanks:

I'm no lawyer, but do you need ownership of a video clip if that clip is put into a video for non commercial use?

Submitted by solar roller on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 1:26pm.

» login to post comments | 5 points

Might be worth them having...

an opening screen citing the "FAIR USE" policy and law.

See the beginning of Loose Change, 9/11 Mysteries etc for specifics. Worked for them... maybe upload as a different user also.

Also include that the persons on the footage "do not necessarily endorse the content of this video".

It might help to mention "non commercial" and that it's investigative journalism etc...

Worth a try, best wishes

Submitted by 911veritas on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 2:39pm.

Recent Headlines

Recent Media

Action Items

Blogads

Banner Exchange

User login

9/11 Inquiry Sites

9/11 Regional Sites

9/11 Related Sites

9/11 International Sites

9/11 Memorial Sites

News and Blogs

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

Details and Preview of Upcoming BBC Episode of 'The Conspiracy Files'