CW11 New York Airs Feature Story on 9/11 Skeptics


24MB WMV

CW11 New York ran a 7 minute spot on 9/11 'conspiracy theories' last night on their 10 o'clock news. While the clip is somewhat focused around Gary Welz, a college professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Fordham and a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, it merely uses him as a context for which to cover the larger subject of 9/11 conspiracy theories. The spot begins with X-Files music and quickly runs through a gamut of conspiracy theories from JFK, to Marilyn Monroe and Princess Di's murders, to Tupac, Elvis, and even Ken Lay still being alive. The spot labels all of these (and 9/11 conspiracy theories) as 'urban legends' and even features David Dunbar (author of 'Debunking 9/11 Myths') mentioning how such skepticism dishonors the dead.

Other things worth noting from the video are Gery Welz's comments on his experience on the morning of 9/11 (he saw the 2nd plane fly overhead into the south tower with a group of friends), bringing up how the EPA lied about the air quality around ground zero, the polls which support widespread skepticism, a brief mention of Loose Change and the missile at the Pentagon theory, the debunked 'plume' footage retracted from 9/11: In Plane Site, a reference to Dr. Griffin's book 'Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11' (although no mention of Dr. Griffin by name), and the claims of Flight 93's plume photo being fake.

According to CW11 New York's website they are "seen in over 10 million homes through over-the-air and satellite distribution". You can stream this video via their webpage for their Fact Finders segments.

A big thanks goes out to Larry for the heads up on this!

Show "Mark Bogani" by Amanda Reconwith

Flight93crash.com looks like a spook site

Their registered contact address is in the Somerset county goverment buildings just 10 miles away from the crash scene and they have NO photos posted of the crash scene. They only post Val McClatchey's photo fraud.

The site wants us to believe UA93 crashed in Shanksville, bottom line.

See the evidence:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1033

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Too funny...

Mainstream Media 9/11 Truth Coverage Checklist

9/11 Truth Debunking Talking Points:


  1. Missile hitting the Pentagon. Check
  2. 100's of people had to be involved, and wouldn't be able to keep it a secret. Check
  3. Psychological need to cling to an alternative story. Check
  4. Promotion of Loose Change. Check
  5. Promotion of In Plane Site. Check

Background Music:


  1. X-Files Check

Conspiracy Comparisons:


  1. JFK Check
  2. Marilyn Monroe Check
  3. Tupac Shakur Check
  4. Ken Lay Alive & Well Check
  5. Elvis Check

Things to avoid:


  1. Families call for a new investigation. Check
  2. Families call for release and declassification of pertinent documentation. Check
  3. 9/11: Press For Truth. Check
  4. Upcoming Arizona Conference Check
  5. Numerous polls indicating majority suspicions. Check
  6. Conflicts of interest in the 9/11 Commission. Check
  7. The complete document: Rebuilding America's Defenses. Check
  8. www.cooperativeresearch.org Check

Obviously that list can go on and on.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Nice one, Jon.

"that is what the military does when there is nothing else to do." -911truthiness

Jon, this is fantastic! lol

Well summarized as ever. This was piece was particularly notable for hitting all the bases. Who writes this stuff?

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

another pft promotion

you do know that globalvision was co-founded by former msm senior producers (boston's abc affiliate and a cnn + 20/20 dude) and harpercollins is owned by news corporation (um, fox news), right? doesn't that at all concern you?
these are the folks that brought us 'press for truth' after all.

Really?

I thought it was Kyle Hence and Rory O'Connor?


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

And me...

Among others. Among MANY others.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

read their resumes

"Co-founded by award-winning journalists Rory O'Connor and Danny Schechter, Globalvision is a full-service, independent, international media company specializing in information, entertainment and educational programming."
rory's
http://www.globalvision.org/who/rory.html
and danny schlechter's
http://www.globalvision.org/who/danny.html

And you know what?

Rory O'Connor is a nice guy, even though we have our disagreements.

Can't say I know Danny Schecter.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Show "and as far as cooperativereasearch goes" by wolfowitz in sh...

Sewing distrust?

Gosh, if I can't trust Paul Thompson, who can and I trust?

O.K., so you've shared with everyone people who you don't trust. Well then, who DO you trust? If my sources are bad, who do you recommend I turn to?

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

Show "supressing the truth" by wolfowitz in sh...
Show "yo....." by wolfowitz in sh...
Show "we know, wolf" by wolfowitz in sh...
Show "i'll take that as a yes" by wolfowitz in sh...

Seriously, can someone

Seriously, can someone explain to me why everyone gives a ton of negative points to posts like previous few. Is it because people do not believe them or because it's wrong posting something that's off topic to the thread? My question also includes the posts that "Amanda" posts about the suspicious websites and their owners? I would just like to know the reason they are voted down so quickly by so many. Thanks.

take a wild guess

thanks for asking. i didn't feel that it was too far off topic after seeing mr. gold post yet another endorsement for 'press for truth.' go back and read my previous posts on this page and do a modicum of research. i believe there are serious "conflicts of interest," to quote mr. gold, when it comes to 'pft.' evidently he's gone missing, or maybe he's checking out the murky water that lies beneath the surface of 'press for truth.'

Those that come here just to

Those that come here just to argue and attack are typically the ones who seem to get voted down.

As for Amanda Reconwith, my guess is because she always posts pages worth of off topic junk which usually has a reasonable non-sinister explanation. Her actions are just annoying in general.

agreed, but

no one has addressed any of the issues i raised. press for truth was put out by a company that was founded by ex-msm senior producers and still holds contracts with the companies actively disparaging 9/11 truth; it was based on a book that only relies on msm for evidence and is owned by the parent company of fox news; the website that contains all of the info from the book was created by a gov't official with direct ties to pakistan; the widows have regularly appeared in the msm; i could go on, but i think a blog entry is in order.

You do know...

That MercuryMedia is the same company that promotes Loose Change right?


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

whats your point?

whats your point?

Isn't it obvious?

you do know that globalvision was co-founded by former msm senior producers (boston's abc affiliate and a cnn + 20/20 dude) and harpercollins is owned by news corporation (um, fox news), right? doesn't that at all concern you? these are the folks that brought us 'press for truth' after all.

#1. 9/11: Press For Truth was created with the help of the Jersey Girls, Bob McIlvaine, Sally Regenhard, Kyle Hence, Rory O'Connor, Paul Thompson, Larisa Alexandrovna, myself, and MANY others. If you're going to mention "the folks that brought us 'press for truth', make sure you mention ALL of the folks, and not just the ones that help people trying to paint the credibility of the film as "murky."

#2. The distributors of the film had nothing to do with the creation of it.

#3. There are obvious double standards taking place. The same distributor that brought us Loose Change, also brought us 9/11: Press For Truth. Why isn't the credibility of Loose Change being questioned for the same reasons?

It seems to me as if this individual is trying to hurt the credibility of a film that has oodles of it to go around.

The funny thing is, I have a version of the film that was made before Rory O'Connor became involved, and the information depicted in it is really no different.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

ah ok, i thought you were

ah ok, i thought you were just taking a shot at Loose Change for no reason. no double standard here, personally i didnt even know who put out either film until just now. i should have read wolfowitz comments but they were hidden.

Dude you need to check your "facts"

It would be so cool if people checked out their 'facts' before smearing them all over the internet. Have you confirmed that the Derek Mitchell of cooperative research used to work at the State Department? I fucking hope so because you are stating it here as a fact. I personally have no idea - except that Derek Mitchell gave me a ride home from a rally once and he was a very cool guy - didn't seem like the State Department type at all... but gee who knows. Do you have any confirmation of what you are now offering as fact?

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Too Funny...

you nailed 'em! Wow!
_______________________
"Cogito ergo sum"

Jon, you're quite a gatekeeper regarding the Pentagon. Why?

It is NOT possible for AA77 to have struck the Pentagon for many reasons, including:

· Hani Hanjour could not have flown back 250 miles from Ohio to find & hit the Pentagon.

· Hanjour could not have made incredible maneuvers in a Boeing 757& fly 2 feet above the ground.

· A Boeing 757 can NOT make/disappear through a 16-foot initial impact hole. The airliner has a 125 foot wingspan & two huge steel/titanium engines that "disappeared" as did the 250 seats & all the luggage.

· There is no way they could ID a planeload of people that slammed the Pentagon @ 530 mph, while the plane itself was supposedly obliterated. The fictitious DNA results were fabricated to bolster the official lie.

· 80 videos of whatever hit or blew-up the Pentagon are being withheld by the gov't for no reason. (The only video released looks like an A3 SkyWarrior!)

Haven't you figured it out?

It's because I am a plant from the CIA. I'm here to influence what the 9/11 Truth Movement focuses on, and what it doesn't.

Or, there is evidence to suggest that it actually was Flight 77, and I hate getting into the back and forth arguments that go nowhere.

Also, I hate it when media pundits have the ability to ask a question as simple as, "Where are the passengers", and make whomever they're talking to look like a fool.


"So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies."

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Perhaps fake/imposter passengers, as per Operation Northwoods

which almost came a reality 45 years ago? And there is very little & very weak evidence to support it actually having been AA77.

Jon, you have to realize a

Jon, you have to realize a lot of these people are new to this.
I think it takes until around year 3 or 4 when you stop talking about the speculation and focus on proving the official story dead wrong. Which isn't hard to do, of course.
Of course, we're certain about CD, but we can't prove it.

No.....

WTC 7 proves CD

All you have to do is see it.

Press for Truth does little or nothing to expose 9/11 as an

inside job. It merely depicts the Bush cabal as liars who covered their own asses regarding their failures & incompetence about that fateful event.

Furthermore Jon, JFK was an obvious inside-job conspiracy, so

let them compare 9/11 truth to it all they want.

More things to avoid...

As you said, the list goes on and on, with far more credible and incriminating facts than what they presented, e.g.

- Thermate residue found
- Molten metal which cannot be aluminum seen pouring out of twin towers
- Melted iron under buildings (fires can't melt steel)
- Buildings collapsing at near free-fall speed
- Puffs of smoke/dust coming out of twin towers way below collapse zone
- Machine-gun like explosions can be heard on footage of collapse
- Explosions reported by WTC staff and firemen, e.g. in basement at the same time as plane impacts
- Huge damages to lobbies, respectively 77 and 93 stories below plane impact
- Evidence from crime scene shipped off for melting in China before it could be examined
- People got warnings
- Intelligence agents caught dancing with joy
- NORAD stand down
- Alex Jones predicted terror event blamed on Osama bin Laden

Avoided

Footage of the collapse of building 7 - CHECK
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

nice job...

Start up your mail people. I'm sending 25 a day.....lol. Join me, won't you?

Good Publicity

As usual Popular Mechanics attacked 911 truth

but it would take SO MANY

but it would take SO MANY PEOPLE!!!!!!! same ol tired crap, its like they all read off of the same friggin script or something.......

Good publicity or not?

I believe this is still good publicity.  However, I wrote those a-holes the following letter:

Your story on 9/11 was a sham.  Why don't you investigate the facts yourself instead just doing a story on "crazy" 9/11 conspiracy theorists?

As New Yorkers, you should know better than to think our government's story is based in fact.  Quite the opposite, even the FBI has no evidence linking Bin Laden to the attacks of 9/11.

Do your homework - the evidence and eye-witness testimony is widely available all over the net.

You misrepresented the 91/11 Truth movement as a bunch of kooks.  Actually, we are the patriots and you, in your support of the goverment's official conspiracy theory,  are the accomplices to mass murder.

Shame on you.  The truth will come out and you will have been on the wrong side of it.

"claims of Flight 93's plume photo being fake"

Sweet!

See it all here: http://flight93photo.blogspot.com/

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.

Does anyone have another link to this video

Having problèmes to hear and see this video here in France. Does anyone have a better link to this video ?

Thanks for any help

Yours

John A MITCHELL

Put it on YouTube...

They plugged the

James Fetzer "scholars" website with link to 911 Researchers. More Disinfo and the MSM eats it up.

Do anybody have better quality video? Audio is too low

on this download unfortunately.

--------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the botched crash scene at Shanksville.