"that is what the military does when there is nothing else to do." -911truthiness

Well summarized as ever. This was piece was particularly notable for hitting all the bases. Who writes this stuff?

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

I thought it was Kyle Hence and Rory O'Connor?

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Among others. Among MANY others.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

"Co-founded by award-winning journalists Rory O'Connor and Danny Schechter, Globalvision is a full-service, independent, international media company specializing in information, entertainment and educational programming."
rory's
http://www.globalvision.org/who/rory.html
and danny schlechter's
http://www.globalvision.org/who/danny.html

Rory O'Connor is a nice guy, even though we have our disagreements.

Can't say I know Danny Schecter.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

Gosh, if I can't trust Paul Thompson, who can and I trust?

O.K., so you've shared with everyone people who you don't trust. Well then, who DO you trust? If my sources are bad, who do you recommend I turn to?

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

Seriously, can someone explain to me why everyone gives a ton of negative points to posts like previous few. Is it because people do not believe them or because it's wrong posting something that's off topic to the thread? My question also includes the posts that "Amanda" posts about the suspicious websites and their owners? I would just like to know the reason they are voted down so quickly by so many. Thanks.

Those that come here just to argue and attack are typically the ones who seem to get voted down.

As for Amanda Reconwith, my guess is because she always posts pages worth of off topic junk which usually has a reasonable non-sinister explanation. Her actions are just annoying in general.

That MercuryMedia is the same company that promotes Loose Change right?

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

whats your point?

you do know that globalvision was co-founded by former msm senior producers (boston's abc affiliate and a cnn + 20/20 dude) and harpercollins is owned by news corporation (um, fox news), right? doesn't that at all concern you? these are the folks that brought us 'press for truth' after all.

#1. 9/11: Press For Truth was created with the help of the Jersey Girls, Bob McIlvaine, Sally Regenhard, Kyle Hence, Rory O'Connor, Paul Thompson, Larisa Alexandrovna, myself, and MANY others. If you're going to mention "the folks that brought us 'press for truth', make sure you mention ALL of the folks, and not just the ones that help people trying to paint the credibility of the film as "murky."

#2. The distributors of the film had nothing to do with the creation of it.

#3. There are obvious double standards taking place. The same distributor that brought us Loose Change, also brought us 9/11: Press For Truth. Why isn't the credibility of Loose Change being questioned for the same reasons?

It seems to me as if this individual is trying to hurt the credibility of a film that has oodles of it to go around.

The funny thing is, I have a version of the film that was made before Rory O'Connor became involved, and the information depicted in it is really no different.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

ah ok, i thought you were just taking a shot at Loose Change for no reason. no double standard here, personally i didnt even know who put out either film until just now. i should have read wolfowitz comments but they were hidden.

It would be so cool if people checked out their 'facts' before smearing them all over the internet. Have you confirmed that the Derek Mitchell of cooperative research used to work at the State Department? I fucking hope so because you are stating it here as a fact. I personally have no idea - except that Derek Mitchell gave me a ride home from a rally once and he was a very cool guy - didn't seem like the State Department type at all... but gee who knows. Do you have any confirmation of what you are now offering as fact?

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

you nailed 'em! Wow!
_______________________
"Cogito ergo sum"

It is NOT possible for AA77 to have struck the Pentagon for many reasons, including:

· Hani Hanjour could not have flown back 250 miles from Ohio to find & hit the Pentagon.

· Hanjour could not have made incredible maneuvers in a Boeing 757& fly 2 feet above the ground.

· A Boeing 757 can NOT make/disappear through a 16-foot initial impact hole. The airliner has a 125 foot wingspan & two huge steel/titanium engines that "disappeared" as did the 250 seats & all the luggage.

· There is no way they could ID a planeload of people that slammed the Pentagon @ 530 mph, while the plane itself was supposedly obliterated. The fictitious DNA results were fabricated to bolster the official lie.

· 80 videos of whatever hit or blew-up the Pentagon are being withheld by the gov't for no reason. (The only video released looks like an A3 SkyWarrior!)

It's because I am a plant from the CIA. I'm here to influence what the 9/11 Truth Movement focuses on, and what it doesn't.

Or, there is evidence to suggest that it actually was Flight 77, and I hate getting into the back and forth arguments that go nowhere.

Also, I hate it when media pundits have the ability to ask a question as simple as, "Where are the passengers", and make whomever they're talking to look like a fool.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

which almost came a reality 45 years ago? And there is very little & very weak evidence to support it actually having been AA77.

Jon, you have to realize a lot of these people are new to this.
I think it takes until around year 3 or 4 when you stop talking about the speculation and focus on proving the official story dead wrong. Which isn't hard to do, of course.
Of course, we're certain about CD, but we can't prove it.