Kucinich is really the only viable candidate.

Considering there are a minimum of about 100 Million people in this country that are fully aware of 9/11 truth and know that this administration is guilty of Treason, War Crimes, Crimes against humanity, mass murder.

If just 1/2 of us voted for Kucinich he would win.

The mainstream media would freak out

"If just 1/2 of us voted for Kucinich he would win."

Not quite. It matters more where those people live than the number of them.

Simuvac, you said, "Remember, Kerry won the popular vote."

That case, and the previous presidential contest too, demonstrate that it also matters who counts the vote. And how they do it. And whose votes they allow, and disallow.

These too are relevant issues for our cause here, don't you suppose.

The other chillingly relevant issue concerns the survival of good candidates, viz., Robert Kennedy long ago and, more recently as Fetzer has alleged, Paul Wellstone.

If Gore won in 2000, then Bush CANNOT legitimately be president. If you aren't elected, you can't be re-elected. Ergo, Kerry won in 2004--by default if nothing else.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

The way the system works.... you can actually win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote and the electoral vote is what actually counts.

The system is flawed in more than one way
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Oh there you go with your facts again!

Actually I knew that, but I was waiting for Brainster to pounce. Oddly he didn't...

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/30-Jan-2007.html
http://www.stewwebb.com/Presidential%20Election%20BUSHES,%20KUCINICH%20&%20THE%20UN...NWO%20FROM%20THE%20HORSE'S%20MOUTH!.htm

He's well in the hands of the controlling elite. Anyone with a large media cloud around him should be suspect nowadays. Anyone who believes otherwise is fooling him/herself. All he does is send mixed messages to attract and distract honest, but somewhat ignorant, people.

The most important thing to do now is to get out of the duopoly party trap. If people fail to get out of that democratic limitation, there is little hope for anything to change to the mafia network which is infiltrating the US, and which is destroying it from within.

Sadly, history teaches us that the majority of people will only react when it is too late, and by that time they are too ignorant and confused to really know what the real problems are that should be dealt with.

Mr. Kucinich: Let me hear your opinion on the stealing Federal Reserve, the corrupt CIA, the corporate media kartels and our democracy, the ever growing militrary industrial complex, the massive influx of Hispanics (14% now, 20% by 2050) and the gangs that grow out of their poverty (such as MS13). Or do I need to explain those to you as well?

but Brend is right, regardless of the "negative point" he was given. The 2-party monopoly won't change a thing. How many times does this need to be proven before The People really take notice? It's going to come down to taking the streets. It's inevitable.

...he has been ostracized from the mainstream of the Democratic party because he has taken up positions contrary to the corporately owned mass media, the CIA, the military-industrial complex, and a host of other issues. He, like Ron Paul, is a patriot in the true sense of the word, a politician who defends the Constitution, not the Federal government.

However, he's known to flip-flop when the winds get cold (such as the 9/11 issue), and he does not really get to the hart of the problems (such as his UN troops replacement proposal for Iraq).

But more important than all the above is his Democratic party membership. Those people pay him and give him his platform. They can take it away at any time. At this point in time he's useful. Staying in the Democratic party means endorsing most of their previous policies and a 'belief' to have a place there.

If he really is a true patriot let him, Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney and all the other true constitutional republicans, libertarians, conservatives, etc. join together and form a new party. A party for and by the people, where they can talk about the real issues without being ostracized by their own party. I believe more and more people are interested in such a party or even parties (at the local level and above).

A naive dream? maybe. The alternative however is a real fascistic nightmare.

Paul also made similar comments about getting a new investigation.

A Paul/Kucinich or Kucinich/Paul ticket would be sweet!

Kucinich danced around the issue and his beliefs about what truely happened. There's a big difference between how he and Ron Paul answer questions. I suggest people play back interviews a few times with kucinich and paul to notice these differences. One is a straight shooter, the other a typical politician.

"... In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." (Galileo Galilei, 1564 - 1642)
OIL IS OBSOLETE - WAKE UP - YOU'VE BEEN LIED TO, AGAIN!
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/

Realist, I wish this really were realistic: "A Paul/Kucinich or Kucinich/Paul ticket..." i.e., a Republican running with a Democrat or vice-versa. Yes, it would be sweet, and partly for its effect in dissolving that artificial barrier.

Any Kucinich staffers reading this? Ron Paul staffers? To either: Does your candidate have that kind of courage?

http://www.truthdig.com/interview/item/20061214_battle_muny_light/