Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Dr. Greg Jenkins, PhD physicist, Interviews Dr. Judy Wood

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
| | | | |

Everyone who has been following the debate within 'Scholars for 9/11 Truth' are well aware of the divisive nature of speculations spewed forth by Fetzer/Wood/Reynolds faction regarding directed energy beams and the demolition of the WTC towers.

A video interview conducted January 10th, 2007 at the National Press Club by Dr. Greg Jenkins, a PhD physicist, attempts to probe the lone 'scientist' who is the pillar behind these speculations. When questioned about information which is publicly posted on her website, Dr. Wood's responses ranged from evasive to juvenile. During one segment of the interview, Dr. Wood is presented with a photograph, her 'favorite' picture from her website, of the South Tower collapse. Her abysmal lack of analytical ability is clearly demonstrated as she attempts to describe what she observes in the photograph.

Run time is 35 minutes including a 2 minute introduction and a 3 minute ending sequence. Enjoy.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017

I couldn't watch it...

because I didn't want to get depressed.....

Clowns representing the movement....... I can't help feeling she is either disinfo and one of the most clueless people about........

i watched the first question

i watched the first question he asked her and thats all i could take. Judy Wood-"uh, we really havent got into listing them yet, just energy weapons." sounds like a real expert......

Sounds like

a boss trying to represent a report that one of their assistants wrote while she was out golfing.
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

it really is sad but very

it really is sad but very useful. we should just link to this when CB Brooklyn and the Nico clowns come around. no arguments, no responding to trolls over 3 pages, just link to this.

Precisely.

That is precisely why this video has been made available. The dialogue and speculation of exotic energy weapons may not necessarily go away completely, however this information should be a great benefit to winnowing out such horrible presentations and foolish defenses by the likes of Dr. Woods.

Best of luck to us all,

e

"that is what the military does when there is nothing else to do." -911truthiness

Greg Jenkins and Judy Wood: An Interview and Analysis

Greg Jenkins and Judy Wood: An Interview and Analysis
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8110

A Brief Analysis of Dr. Judy Wood’s Request for Correction to NIST: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8294

yes, exactly

It would also be helpful to link to something where these clowns are on the record defending her, because they could easily change their tune later and new people won't remember who exactly showed such suspiciously poor judgement in the past. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any easy way of finding old posts on this site... or am I missing some cool trick for that?

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

I don't know about a "cool"

I don't know about a "cool" trick--but our site search can be occasionally brisk.

If you have a name and can remember the rough time frame, that helps. I've hunted down 911debunker, MoronJihad, Randkiller2006 on others with less pain than expected.

Anyone else?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

off subject, but it's j woods, so who cares

http://www.kurdistan.org/Speeches/warcrimes.html
how long has the us been involved in systematic killings? oh yeah, that's how we took over this great land. ever hear about the holocaust of native americans in the msm, history books, museums, etc.?

Clearly Judy had a bad day, but why focus on that?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Interview Transcript

JW = Judy Wood         GJ = Greg Jenkins 

[Transcript of last part of interview] 

GJ: You have to do some analysis [calculating the energy involved with an energy beam—something that Judy Wood describes as a “distraction” earlier in the interview] 

JW: [Interrupting] is dust denser than solid steel or is it—? 

GJ: [Interrupting]—Of course not.  It’s much less dense. 

JW: So… then how much do we have?

GJ: How much of what should we have?  [Pausing because no answer is given]  Of steel?  Or of concrete? 

JW: This, this, this is, [stuttering nervously] this is not uh… productive.  It’s not educational.

GJ: It’s educational for me.

JW: This is a game you’re playing. 

GJ: I’m really not playing a game.  I’m just trying to figure out what you have on your website.  I’m asking questions regarding it. 

… [GJ commenting after the interview] 

I was just trying to see what kind of scientific basis this was in.... and I think I found out.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Jenkins gets the height of the TT wrong twice

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Must see video....

I had to give this blog a 10...

Not for Wood's junk science, but for Dr. Greg Jenkins (of DC911Truth) interview of her.

I think he is totally flabbergasted by her ridiculous claims as any real scientist would be too.

The only real shame is that this got to the National Propaganda (ooops Press) Club in the first place.

nuff said...

Is this guy being paid by the NSA?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

When is Judy Wood going to stop distorting Jones' research

Judy Wood has repeatedly distorted Steven Jones’ position on the use of thermite.

[Reynolds and Wood] “Why does Dr. Jones continue to boast that he uses "the scientific method" after it has been pointed out repeatedly that his thermite hypothesis does not account for the data? Does not science throw a failed hypothesis overboard after the evidence repeatedly contradicts it?”

Answer:

Jones has never claimed that thermite or its variants account alone for all the observations. There is obvious evidence that incendiary thermite was used and there is evidence that the towers exploded which may have been caused by nanothermite or may have been caused by something else, such as conventional demolition explosives.”

When is Judy Wood going to stop distorting the research of Steven Jones?

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Still following rule #1 I

Still following rule #1 I see.

Rule #1) Always attack the person, never the subject matter.

I see you and CB_Brooklyn both posted comments referring to the same documents at almost the exact same time. Where can we sign up to get on your cult mailing list?

NSA? Would explain the "collapse" disinfo

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

you traitor.

you traitor.

Jim Fetzer, with all due respect, you are delusional.

It pains me to say that because you’ve been one of my biggest heroes in the 9/11 truth movement. I feel betrayed.

I was there too, both for your presentation and for the interview. I saw—and the video shows—the exact opposite of what you described: Greg Jenkins’ conduct was a model of propriety and restraint. Judy Wood, on the other hand, was vague, evasive, interruptive, kept derailing the questions, was clearly unwilling (or unable) to discuss anything on a professional level.

Lacking any scientific (or even logical) basis for her claim—other than one ambiguous photo, she resorts to accusing Jenkins of having ulterior motives, playing games, interjecting distractions, not being “productive.” This is a posture of desperation.

One thing the video does not show is how you came up to Jenkins after the interview, while he was still seated, and began shouting at him things like “Who put you up to this? Was it Jim Hoffman? Do you know Steven Jones?” and on and on until several people, including myself, surrounded you to defuse the situation.

Your attacks here on Dr. Jenkins, are unbecoming. Pure ad hominems and non sequiturs. As a philosopher of science and professor of critical thinking, you should know better.

If you are absolutely sincere, please try to rehabilitate yourself by acknowledging your errors. It may not be possible, the way you’ve squandered your credibility this past year. But we need someone with your experience and charisma in this movement. Don’t let ego or paranoia get the better of you.

And please don’t take us for fools.

I second that.

And witness to the accuracy describing Jim Fetzer's strange behavior after the interview.

What say you, Jim?

e

"that is what the military does when there is nothing else to do." -911truthiness

Woods looked and sounded

Like some drunk they found in an alley somewhere.

She was clearly lying through her teeth.
I'd really like to know what it is that Fetzer and Woods and a few of these other disinfo loons are getting for this.

if anyone

has this video in a quicktime format - or could convert it for me - i would of course be eternally grateful.

Alright man I’ll try and

Alright man I’ll try and grab it for you and convent it to mpeg, check back here later and I should have it up...

Original Video files

John, I have the original. I sent you an e-mail and can send any format you want, in any resolution you want.

Check your e-mail.

Thanks to 'Dem Bruce Lee Styles' for offering to convert....

--- hsgsj

Alright cool, no problem

Alright cool, no problem I'll stop converting it and the original will be the best quality anyway.

Wow, that was horrible. 

Wow, that was horrible.  "Dustification"???  Nobody is really saying the beams were "dustified" are they?  They were broken in convenient 20-30 foot pieces, the concrete was reduced to dust. 

Plus how can she say there are no images of molten metal?  We have videos that show backhoes hauling out the metal, plus numerous witness accounts.  And yet she tells us that its not really important to determine the exact "energy beams" that were used that day.

Incredible.  Think for yourself people.Smile

"Dustification"??? Does

"Dustification"??? Does she also have a "dustologist" like Mark in CrossBall?

Seriously, I'm pretty certain "dustologist" is a made up word, by me, and probably others, for silliness.

What worries me is when these people say "dustification", they ARE NOT being satirical.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

"dustification"

a quick google search on this word says it all.

That's sad. Impeachment.

That's sad.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

This is fantastic, Medics I

This is fantastic, Medics I suggest you have another go man and watch it all because Greg Jenkins does a brilliant job just asking Wood the most fundamental of basic questions, and the way she responds to each one is to almost squirm in her seat and say the most indicting ridiculous shit.

He asks her what tests she has done to produce powderized metal and the reply is amazing she says - "errmmm just put things in a microwave" YEA LIKE PUTTING METAL IN MICROWAVES IS A GREAT IDEA!