That's not how I saw it. Your boy got his ass handed to him, on his home turf.

Exactly! However, Kevin did a fair job in the face of a mass murderer enabler. In the future, anybody from the 911 Truth Movement should use any mainstream media attention as prime time to promote simple things.

Just shout it out over and over:

911 Press for Truth is the Official 911 Commission's Family Steering Committee's documentary covering their experience with the Official 911 Commission.

Major Miliray Exercises mimicking the exact acts of the supposed hijackers were occuring on 911.

Shout websites

Shout google search phrases, for example "world trade center 7 fire"

Shout David Ray Griffin; shout Professor Steven Jones; etc...

We need to sieze control of any major media airtime we recieve. The bottom line message of the shout-outs will break through to inquisitive minds. Loyal Bill O-Lilly viewers will not care how well spoken a 911 argument is, let alone such an argument has barely a chance on mainstream media.

911 Shout Outs are the answer for mainstream media appearances.

Well of course not. Running down the street shouting your head off would make you sound like a lunatic. That we agree on. But first get this straight, just because a lunatic is running down the street shouting, "911 was an inside job," the lunatic doesn't make a difference if it is true or not. Secondly, my comments were not made on the street, they were directed towards a television program purported to be a news/magazine show with a pretty decent sized audience. Anytime in the past 6 will years will show you that presently Bush has reached his lowest in the poles. His loyal base of foxxies have begun to doubt the Disneyland vision of US politics that FOX has sold them (and sold it to many of them with fluxuating lending rates). Finally this base of GOP/FOX is open for debate. They will investigate to some degree. I think it best that given that O'Lilly has the power to control his own show, trying to win a debate is practically useless, he'll damn everything. Truth Shout outs are needed and it can be done skillfully. Whatever the question the answer should alway manage to get across catch phrases, or solid 911 Truth names, or DVD and book titles, get those shout-outs to the foxxies. It will lead them to Truth. By no means was I criticizing Kevin Barrett, either. The fact that Kevin answered clearly to the best of his abilities under the extreme pressure of a setup from powerhouse Bill O'Lilly & FOX, it pretty much is a testament of the quality individual Mr Kevin Barrett appears to be. But this is not neccasarily about Kevin Barrett. Most of all, my comments were merely intended to push forthe an idea of sizing up each and every media interview for what it obviously is, and Bill O'Lilly is obvious. I think that whatever the show, whoever appears obvious, whatever the question, primarily it should be answered but always manage to bring it back to these primary ideas: 911 Press for Truth - the Official 911 Commission's Family Steering Committee's documentary about their struggle in dealing with the present administration in Washington DC. Also, the military exercises occuring on 911. And, why is the administration preventing an investigation? Why have they refused to turn over essential documents, film footage, and the release of official testimonies.

$20 bucks

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2364206678564389150&q=%2420+buck...

Typical scumbag tactics.

Kevin Barrett was excellent.

I've mentioned several times that the editors at the BBC have been very even as of late about allowing comments about alternative theories of 911 to be posted on their blog (and even several comments on their main news sight "have your say" forum). They will also be airing an upcoming show on it. The likes of Barret should be seaking out more 'reputal' sources of MS than assclowns like Bill Oily.

sound-bytes:

1) that the mainstream, "liberal" media hasn't covered 9/11 truth, and

2) that Barrett isn't teaching at university this semester.

O'Reilly made these 2 misleading points hit-and-run style, not giving Barrett any real time to respond/elaborate.

I don't think this rushed, hasty debate changed anyone's mind one way or the other. Barrett & others who find themselves under such ambush journalism should just repeatedly interject "WTC-7" and "NORAD stand down," IMO.

.

O'Reilly hammered away at a point he has made before: that if there was any merit to truthseekers' arguments, the "anti-American" press in other countries would have picked up on it and published front page articles. The fact that they haven't is proof to O'Reilly, and many others, that we must be wrong.

What Barrett should have pointed out is that there is no more any "anti-American" media, nor any "pro-American" media for that matter. The greatest part of the mainstream media around the world has been bought up by pro-Zionist entities. In the words of anti-Zionist writer Israel Shamir:

"Too many of our media lords subscribe to the notion of Jewish supremacy, and they are spread around the globe. In England there is Conrad Black: he owns many papers in Canada, the US, and in Israel. In our country, he owns the Jerusalem Post. When he bought this paper, he dismissed the staff and hired people of his opinions. He is a right-wing Zionist, a zealous supporter of Jewish supremacy......This international group of media lords, from Washington to Moscow, is not subservient to the interests of Israel. But support of Israel is part of their agenda..... [Galilee Flowers, pp. 219]

And suppression of all discussion of 9/11 is also part of that agenda, for obvious reasons. Kevin Barrett could have pointed this out, but if he had, it is unlikely Mort Zuckerman's Fox network would have broadcast it.