Which city did they mention?

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

they mentioned at least 3, i'll have to go back and watch, but they only had video from Boston. im gonna go ahead and assume that the George Washington in the video isnt 911blogger's GeorgeWashington,haha. or maybe it is, who knows.

If you use that brain of yours, you should be able to figure it out...

Who did I ask that question to? What do the both of us have in common?

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

hey Jon, why do you go out of your way to start shit with me? do you know what that looks like? was that really called for? i know we have had arguments before but i really try not to start anything with you. you are the older one in this equation, i figured it would be you who would be most interested in keeping things civil.

Sorry if it came across that way. I was trying to promote a GOOD thing that you would appreciate.

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

ok, sorry, we have had words before so i took this as a shot:"If you use that brain of yours, you should be able to figure it out..."

my fault if it wasnt, sorry for the over-reaction in that case. and i do appreciate it, despite any words we may have had over petty shit, we basically have the same goals and anyone who devotes time/money/energy to the cause of 9/11 truth is appreciated by me.(except for those that work from within to destroy the momentum this movement has had. that obviously isnt you, im speaking mainly of the Morgan Reynolds crowd)

Now, what do I win?

LOL

Keep up the good work, y'all!

The truth is on our side, we are winning.

Be well.

I could think of several reasons why the Boston Press would ignore this.

at this point all mainstream media has their ass on the line as much as anyone in the government. All they are responsible for is ignoring us at this point. They have realized that debating us does them absolutely no good.

We can not rely on them

So don't expect anything but complicity and coverup. You can go ahead and believe the Times or any of their papers when they claim to have erred with WMD reporting (just look up Judith Miller) but the facts are clear. They helped sell the Iraq War, they helped to cover up 9/11.

Who are these mysterious owners of the biggest papers in our biggest cities? Where do their interests and loyalties lie? Is it with the American people?

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

We only need to watch the Boston Tea Party video on Google 100,000 more times this week

if that freaking "Sex Accident" video can hit 2,000,000 views? what a joke.... what is that video? is it funny? is it interesting? is it anything? NO!

we need to get the videos of the speeches up there.... The speech that Michael Berger gave in St. Louis was very good

The Boston Tea video is good because it is short and sweet and it will give people something to look at and to link the other videos to when we get them uploaded

Right now it is listing the views at 1,055?

it was at 1,052 this morning before I watched it three times.... am I the only one watching this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4182149218743525800&q=boston+te...

Google video has become a wasteland of traffic-enhansing-wannabes.

Youtube is well on its way to becoming like google video, ever since google bought it.

Thanks for the label... perhaps you could take a minute to label yourself... give yourself a name that best describes you.... like Bob, or Jim or Dick or Arlo or ???

Input appreciated.

I'm not ashamed of trying to bolster the numbers on these videos... the same as Google isn't ashamed of altering them.

I am ashamed that these are the measures we need to take to get this seen by the people. I am ashamed of our media.

"perhaps you could take a minute to label yourself... give yourself a name that best describes you.... like Bob, or Jim or Dick or Arlo or ???"

I second this: it is a courtesy that cuts down on unnessecary confusion and allows us to know who to complement when referenceing your posts! *smiling brightlly*

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

take a look at the man who just took over The Philadelphia Inquirer:

Brian P. Tierney is a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, businessman and former Republican activist.[1] He is the chief executive of Philadelphia Media Holdings L.L.C., and the publisher of the The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.

He founded Tierney Communications, a public relations firm, in 1989. He sold Tierney Communications and an ad agency he ran in 1998 to True North Communications.[2] Tierney's most notable public relations client was the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. In the late 1990s Tierney heavily criticized The Philadelphia Inquirer and Inquirer reporter Ralph Cipriano over reports about the Archdiocese. Cipriano later accused The Inquirer of giving into demands from the Archdiocese and censoring his reports.[3]

In March, 2006 Tierney assembled a group of mostly former clients or people that are with him on the board of the Episcopal Academy to buy Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. He and other local businessman formed Philadelphia Media Holdings L.L.C. and bought The Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News and philly.com from The McClatchy Company which was selling off less profitable newspapers after buying Philadelphia Newspapers Inc.'s parent company Knight Ridder.[1]

yep, the same guy who actively tried to castrate The Inquirer and keep it from printing stories damaging to his powerful clients now holds a major stake in it. and notice that he assembled "a group of mostly former clients" to buy it. real nice huh? pretty obvious where Mr. Tierney's interests lie. ive already noticed stark changes with the editorial board and also with what stories they choose to put on A-21 instead of the cover where they belong. i remember watching a weekly public affairs show that comes on each saturday morning around here("Inside Story" for those of you in the area) and Tierney was always the most obvious shill, always making excuses for the republican party and big business despite the reality. i never could have imagined that same partisan hack would own the only paper i read almost daily.