The questions deserve answers! Like i said before.
We don't need to solve what happened on 9/11.The questions are enough.We need our congress to do the job we appointed them to do,and a media to cover it.
We also don't need to argue between us truthers.
So to the new congress....WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND ANSWERS!

Alan Dershowitz never misses a chance to lobby false charges of anti-semitism at somebody. i cant stand that man.

Engelhard: Carter’s Book is Mein Kampf, Protocols

Novelist Jack Engelhard, minus a firm grip on reality, absurdly lambastes former president Jimmy Carter as the author of a modern day version of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Engelhard is whirled into a tizzy by Carter’s Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid published recently by Simon & Schuster, not exactly the publishing wing of Hamas.

“Israel’s continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land,” writes Carter.

For Englehard, however, telling this simple and undeniable truth is akin to “Holocaust Part 2,” and is downright biblical, as in the Old Testament part of the Bible. “Historians tell us that Pharaoh was the first to stir up the multitudes against the Jews, and we have it from Scripture that a new Pharaoh will arise to torment us from generation to generation.” Carter, according to Englehard, is this “new Pharaoh,” arrived to persecute the Jews, never mind the colonization Carter writes about is an established and verifiable fact, one systematically ignored by Englehard.

Instead of reading Carter’s book “chapter and verse,” Mr. Engelhard relies on the pro-torture advocate, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz. “Dershowitz, to find point-by-point where Carter turns history on its head, truth inside out. That’s where we find exactly how Carter casts five and half million Israelis as villains against 300 million peace-loving Arabs,” the novelist writes.

But then, of course, novelists specialize in fiction.

Carter has not cast five million Israelis against “300 million peace-loving Arabs,” a sarcastic enough portrayal—in fact, racist, as it appears Engelhard believes most of these Arabs are anything but “peace-loving” and are instead stubbornly determined to kill the Jews, or at least push them into the sea, a common enough Zionist myth, for some reason usually accepted with little challenge, at least here in America. No, in his book, and on C-Span and elsewhere, Carter asserts a rudimentary and irrefutable fact: Israel is an apartheid state (although the term apartheid is less than sufficient) and so long as it remains so there will not be peace in the “Holy Land,” or for that matter anywhere else in the Middle East.

http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=693

In case the word hasn't been spread the "New York Film Critics" have chosen the fictional propaganda piece
"UNITED 93" has it's "Film of the Year". I will admit that I haven't seen the movie but "Film of the Year"?!!!!!
Was this the only film the critics watched all year? This movie was nothing less than a pathetic attempt to have us believe what DIDN'T happen. I'm not sure how the timing of this announcement fits in with mass media government cover up but let's not be fooled into thinking this "award" was given out on merit. Does anyone ever wonder how when people call into radio shows on their cell phones while driving that more often than not the connection becomes intermittent or simply breaks off ? BUT, we are all to believe that numerous, lengthy cell phone calls were made at 35,000 feet in a 757 going 500 miles an hour all without a hitch........ truth is stranger than fiction.

For the scientifically minded truthers here, I recommend this blog,

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2006/12/your_friday_dose_of_woo_and_no...

It's been going on since Friday and I just don't have the time to go on...
The arguments are getting technical too, but the bullshit is still flying..

Bullshit example: "What appears to be material ejected upward could actually be the light alluminum panels..."
They say that even though I continually point out that steel beams were photographed 200' away embedded in nearby buildings...

Below are two examples of OCT defenders quoting me, followed by their response.
Can you join it?

solar roller:
[You say that] Near freefall time is suspect? Just time one of the many videos yourself! I know that dust obscures the view, but it's really not hard to extrapolate to get close.
I don't need a website to tell me the collapse time.
Don't like that imprecision?
OK then please read the seismic proof link I gave above (for the twin towers).
THAT is exact. It is PROOF that the the official conspiracy theory is a farce.

Response:
Parts of the building not in the 208/208 ft square of the building's footprint fell faster than that in the footprint. How hard is that to get? The videos show this. The exterior walls peeled away and fell unimpeded. The core had to fall... through the core. The perimiter walls began to make it to the ground in a bit more than 9 seconds. The core appears to follow at between 11 and 13 seconds (dust, smoke, debris cloud makes it hard to tell exact time).
The seismic proof is anything but. The second collapse event that the seismograph records is less than free fall time, and therefore, cannot be correct. Instead, it shows us what the seismographs detected compared to background signals. So the beginning or end of the collapse was less "noisy" than the ambient vibrations. This teaches us a valuable lesson on attempting to use any device near its limit of detection.
So we have proof that the official story is closer to correct than this supposed gospel truth.
Regarding the fall of WTC7, it is the first time that a steel frame building collapsed after having part of another building fall into it, causing structural damage, accompanied by fire. So another first.
What appears to be material ejected upward could actually be the light alluminum panels that were attached to the exterior of the building, caught in the turbulent airflow, not steel support beams. Some clearly do not follow a balistic path, further evidence that these objects move at the whim of the airflow.

solar roller:
"Perhaps an accurate [NIST] computer model could explain how multi ton steel can be thrown horizontally over 200 feet!"

Response:
Perhaps. But I think you underestimate the difficulty of modelling the collapse process. You need collision detection. (Computationally expensive, but tractable). You need to model the elastic and ductile behaviour of the steel. (Also tractable). There will be a great many elements to model, which you will need to fit into RAM. (I believe current machines top out at about a terabyte of ram, so maybe). You need to model the fracture of the steel and failure of the joints (um ...). You need to model what the concrete is doing. You can't model every fragment of concrete (there are far to many), so you'll need approximations of the dynamics of concrete rubble in violent motion (it's safe to say they're unknown). You'll probably want to model the (turbulent) flow of the air, but current computers are simply not powerful enough, so you'll need approximations. (Computers a just getting powerful enough to model turbulent 3-D processes now.). There will be large relative velocities during collapse so you need a very small time step size. Combine that with the number of elements to simulate, and current hardware is simply inadequate to model the entire collapse within a human lifetime, even if you could design a model.

--------------------

All aspects of the truth are consistent