Recent Headlines

Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence
Investigate Waste, Fraud & Abuse at NIST
Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Recent Media

Kevin Barrett: Beam weapons critics making 'a tactical mistake'

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

For weeks now we have been told by a vocal group on this forum that the so-called "Space Beams" research of Professor Judy Wood is 'disinformation' and damages the movement.
The argument has split Scholars for Truth down the middle and has resulted in an unprecedented volley of attacks on the integrity of James Fetzer, who has an open mind on these theories.

Steven Jones chose, wrongly in my view, to ally himself with this group and as a result has left the Scholars with his band of supporters to start a new rival group.
Those of us who stuck by the right of Judy Wood to propose this research have also been insulted and bullied by a vocal minority. Until now there was no voice to answer these shill accusers.

Now, in an interview on GCN on Saturday, Kevin Barrett and Sophia from 911 Mysteries have come to our defense. While it would be asking too much for an apolgy from those who have dragged our names through the mire, it would be good to know that Kevin Barrett's wish that the subject be treated with the seriousness it merits is respected.

http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Barrett/0611/20061125_Sat_Barrett2.mp3

Kevin Barrett on Directed Energy Weapons aka "Space Beams"

"I would urge people to go take a look at this material".

''I think we don't really need any kind of unanimity from researchers''

''I don't think this is doing any permanent harm to the 9/11 movement ''

''I think people who are blowing it up into something really huge are either sort of panicking or just making a tactical mistake''

''...people who are really sort of allergic to the idea that some kind of unconventional technology might have been used. ''

''[the perpetrators] would have taken advantage of the most advanced technologies of deception and demolition, and in fact they would have arranged it in such a way that anyone who figured out exactly what happened and described it accurately would sound completely insane''

''So, I wouldn't rule out anything and I think we need to allow researchers to pursue their own path,''

''we need to criticize each other in a hopefully amicable manner''

update: Thursday, December 14

This blog has had over 200 comments, not all of them mine. That should be enough evidence of a lively interest in this subject , despite the stated view of many that to discuss it is damaging to the movement.

I would welcome clarification from Kevin and Sophia, but it is clear from their words that they do not support the theory but are interested in discussing it. That is all I have been arguing for, and it seems that by your actions in posting here many of you agree.

EVIDENCE FOR SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ON 9/11

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Alex Floum is Top-Lapdog of

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Get of this site Nico you

Get of this site Nico you batshit nutty fruitcake!

DBLS: your house is falling apart.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Ooo Ooo Ooo!!!

Do Me Next!!! 

 

heh 

Hahahahahahahahahaha,

Hahahahahahahahahaha, excellent! That was so funny, all be it unintentional I'm sure, still good though! Here's a few excerpts from Nico's mad ravings, these are even better;

"It is *Haupt, Holmgren, Grable*, who must be "crazy". As suggested by many, i.e. also 9/11 Truthling Manic Dem Bruce Styles, one of the most rabid 9/11 Truthlings on 911blogger.com, but ironically a hiphop fan like me.
Did the perps pick him for me, to trigger my negative emotions? If so, the perps tried that also with Eastman, Jonathan Gold and Kyle Hence before, all 'music empty'.

Since i am also an electronic music fan, especially drum n'bass, where is *that* truthling for it yet, dumbasses?!"

"3. "Agent" John Albanese attacks Haupt openly on 911blogger.com as "CointelPro" and even tried to call the INS on him to check his immigration status.

This is an illogical character assassination strategy of Albanese, himself however also linked to some multiple disorder.
In one case it is a construct by someone called nicotips@yahoo.com, that Albanese allegedly works for Canadian Intel. But Albanese's "strategy" is indeed completely illogical:
*If* Haupt would be illegal in the U.S., wouldn't the INS protect him, after informed by the indirect line of the 9/11 Perps?

Or would they do the opposite and trick him out with a very sinister honeypot connection? Did they?

Albanese is either so dumb like fish or cointel-pro concept himself.

However we know he isn't that dumb at all and a slick limited hangouter at least."

"Sabotage? Of course an Orwellian Concept is indeed sabotaged by me, especially "Special K" activism, the worst form of sabotaged pseudo activism itself,
see also my YOUTUBE Interview from RadicalPragmatist, in which i ironically look like Charles Manson. It must have been my brain cells, influencing my skin apparatus : )

Do the perps want to turn me into a suicide commando, Vendetta or terrorist or cancerize me with Polonium 210-cigarettes (True Blue?)?

Hence said similar things on so called "sabotage" about Holmgren and Grable as well.
He must know why. He once worked for the Soros family!"

"The MIT 9/11 perps also think, they found my weakest link to turn it against me: Pornography and Voyeurism obsessions.

(Well on that matter i am pretty dissapointed of the MIT 9/11 Perps:
Hey Folks, i am in NYC!!!
I worked for Christoph Schlingensieff and Josh Harris.
It was all in WIRED Magazine already years ago!
Are u stupid, LOL?? Bring on the tapes!)"

wow

how do you explain this? it is sooooo insane that i fail to see what he even accomplishes with these sorts of fictional attacks.

maybe this guy is just a heartless opportunist who wants to just make himself as famous as possible - at anyone and everyone else's expense - by creating the most prurient and slanderous accusations possible.

Maybe he is just the internet equivalent of a "shock jock" who ensures good ratings by saying the most outragious things possible.

i wonder if any of this stuff is actionable in a court of law. i do have an attorney on retainer. i wonder if there is any value in going after this guy legally for slander?

Mr. Albanese, You Don't Need Alex Floum as Your Attorney!

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

You're right

According to Haupt I have the entire Canadian Intelligence Services at my disposal.

Does Canadian Intelligence Also Need a Good Attorney?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

John Ashcroft? Hows the Israeli job?

Your buddy Chertoff has been looking for you.

Attack Ideas, not

Attack Ideas, not People

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Pre-9/11 Cold Fusion U.S.

Pre-9/11 Cold Fusion U.S. Patent, once blocked by Steven E. Jones, linked to suspicious murder
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2364
By ewing2001
December 14, 2006

picked up at (internal story)

Pre-9/11 Cold Fusion U.S. Patent, once blocked by Steven E. Jones, linked to suspicious murder

December 14, 2006

by ewing2001

(see also
Steven "Los Alamos" Jones biggest Traitor of U.S. since George Westinghouse (1880)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2325 )

(Photo: Eugene F. Mallove, Fleisch/Ponsman Cold Fusion Supporter)

As 911bloglines.com and others resported (Rosalee Grable, "HeavyWaterGate",

Jones sabotaged cold fusion research
, in 1989 a panel organized by the U.S. Department of Energy, with the help of Steven "Los Alamos" Jones (now one of the leaders of the "9/11 Truth Movement" concluded there was no convincing evidence that useful sources of energy would result from the phenomena attributed to cold fusion...

However the US Patent Office accepted at least one patent of cold fusion in 2001,

interestingly also only a few weeks before 9/11.

This US patent 6,248,221, was cited by Infinite energy, by Eugene F. Mallove.
Mallove discussed the R&D behind this patent with co-inventor Randolph R. Davis (the other is Thomas F. McGraw), whom he has "known since the early 1990s", though he "was unaware of his involvement with this work":

Landmark Cold Fusion Patent Issued
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue41/landmark.html

"...Approval of the patent was through an art group within the USPTO that somehow managed to escape the well-known forces of opposition..."

Mallove was highly critical of the DOE Sabotage Stunt against the Fleischmann-Pons paper of 1989.

He brutally was killed May 14, 2004. The crime wasn't officially solved until 1 year later.

Pureenergy wrote, that he "left MIT faculty position in 1989 in protest over what he considered to be rigged data intended to debunk Cold Fusion...."

http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/2004/05/15/EugeneMalloveDies/index...
Pure Energy Systems News
May 15, 2004

NORWICH, CT, USA

Dr. Eugene Mallove, the tireless spokesperson for integrity and honesty in cold fusion
research, whose persistent efforts finally persuaded the U.S. Department

Dr. Eugene Mallove, to give the phenomenon a second look
after 15 years of denial and stonewalling, was killed in Norwich, CT on 14 May 2004..."

The official patsy killers had been mentioned here:

http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituaries/2004/EugeneMallove/

# Second suspect implicated in Mallove killing - Provides more details
of the murder and of the two suspects: Gary McAvoy and Joseph Reilly.
McAvoy "cried and curled up into the fetal position when he was first
questioned about the murder of Eugene Mallove." (Norwich Bulletin;
July 12)
# Police say McAvoy did not act alone

http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituaries/2004/EugeneMallove/

McAvoy Pleads 'Not Guilty'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove

....On October 4, 2005, a judge ruled that there was enough evidence for Joseph Reilly to stand trial for felony murder...

http://www.controversial-science.com/cf/patent.html

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issues "cold fusion" patent

"...According to a report in the new technology journal Infinite Energy (Issue 41, 2002), the U.S. Patent Office has approved a cold fusion patent. Although the details behind the patent are being withheld for proprietary reasons, according to Infinite Energy Editor-in-Chief Eugene F. Mallove, U.S. Patent #6,248,221 for "Electrolysis Apparatus and Electrodes and Electrode Material Therefor," issued to Randolph R. Davis and Thomas F. McGraw, is definitely a patent for a form of cold fusion technology. The Davis and McGraw patent cites several cold fusion papers, including Pons and Fleishmann's 1989 article "Electrochemically Induced Nuclear Fusion of Deuterium"...

...Why the Davis and McGraw patent was allowed to slip by the usual cold fusion censors remains a mystery, but while it is certain Patent #6,248,221 represents a breakthrough, it is not the first time a cold fusion patent has fallen through the cracks at the USPTO. A cold fusion device invented by physical chemist James Patterson is patented under U.S. Patents #4,943,355 and #5,036,031. According to Mallove, the most recent Patterson patent was granted by accident in 1994...

...Davis and McGraw, in a paper presented at the American Nuclear Society's 33rd Intersociety Engineering Conference on Energy Conversion ("Critical Factors in Transitioning from Fuel Cell to Cold Fusion Technology"), explain why more patents are likely to be issued, even by the perennially biased U.S. Patent Office....

Posted on: Thu, Dec 14 2006

A Downside to the 9/11 Directed-Energy Weapons Hypothesis?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Why Would Probable Truth about "Free Energy" Get Rated "-5"?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

I agree with your position Thomas

and i was amazed to see your name ( and Judy Wood and Jim Fetzer for pete's sake!) on Nico's list of suspected inflltrators. I guess if both sides suspect you then you are probably OK.

Like you I refuse to attack Dr Jones without clear indication that he has intentionally harmed 911 truth. Ditto 'GW'/Floum. That does not make it 'disinfo' to ask for clarification on certain issues of possible conflicts of interest. My concerns over Jones's past and his present unscientific disinclination to consider the possibility that directed energy weapons were used at the WTC have not been answered. We are constantly being told to "Ask questions; Demand answers'' but when they are at all awkward we are met with a hail of abuse. Do the perps need the protection of the Truth movement? It seems so.

What was that...

I was saying about providing ammunition against us?



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

911ConspiracySmasher.blogspot.com

Could make a living bashing this movement based on the work of 2 or 3 people.

Nice of those 2 or 3 people isn't it?



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

explain to people that they've been

conditioned into thinking all this "space age" technology can only be real in fiction movies and video gamesl. Then point them to all those articles proving them wrong. Also point out that the government is always 15-20 yrs ahead from where the publicly admit

I can't wait...

For John Albanese's movie...



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

a movie good for those who want to

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

No...

I suspect it will be a movie that exposes the 9/11 Perps even moreso than we have already done.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

When I say "we"...

That doesn't include you and your merry band of lunatics.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

you really are a gullible person.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

If it's...

One person that knows about "the trap that's clearly being laid out", it would be you.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

Last time I tried your trick of cascading posts ...

dz popped up and said, "You're flooding the site''.

I don't ...

let Conspiracysmasher decide what I post on 911blogger.

Do you?

And one last question before I go...

If, as you often say, you have no interest in attracting attention to 'space beams', why have you posted so many comments on this blog?

No...

My common sense helps me decide what I post on 911blogger.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

Spacebeams is, like, soooo last week

Don't you guys have anything new and "fascinating"?