Blogads

Asbestos Dangers



Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.

FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.

Get the news, get the facts.

User login

RSS Feeds


Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Web Stuff

This site best viewed with Firefox





Kevin Barrett: Beam weapons critics making 'a tactical mistake'

( Home » blogs » Andrew Lowe Watson's blog » Kevin Barrett: Beam... )
Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.
Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 1:15am.

For weeks now we have been told by a vocal group on this forum that the so-called "Space Beams" research of Professor Judy Wood is 'disinformation' and damages the movement.
The argument has split Scholars for Truth down the middle and has resulted in an unprecedented volley of attacks on the integrity of James Fetzer, who has an open mind on these theories.

Steven Jones chose, wrongly in my view, to ally himself with this group and as a result has left the Scholars with his band of supporters to start a new rival group.
Those of us who stuck by the right of Judy Wood to propose this research have also been insulted and bullied by a vocal minority. Until now there was no voice to answer these shill accusers.

Now, in an interview on GCN on Saturday, Kevin Barrett and Sophia from 911 Mysteries have come to our defense. While it would be asking too much for an apolgy from those who have dragged our names through the mire, it would be good to know that Kevin Barrett's wish that the subject be treated with the seriousness it merits is respected.

http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Barrett/0611/20061125_Sat_Barrett2.mp3

Kevin Barrett on Directed Energy Weapons aka "Space Beams"

"I would urge people to go take a look at this material".

''I think we don't really need any kind of unanimity from researchers''

''I don't think this is doing any permanent harm to the 9/11 movement ''

''I think people who are blowing it up into something really huge are either sort of panicking or just making a tactical mistake''

''...people who are really sort of allergic to the idea that some kind of unconventional technology might have been used. ''

''[the perpetrators] would have taken advantage of the most advanced technologies of deception and demolition, and in fact they would have arranged it in such a way that anyone who figured out exactly what happened and described it accurately would sound completely insane''

''So, I wouldn't rule out anything and I think we need to allow researchers to pursue their own path,''

''we need to criticize each other in a hopefully amicable manner''

update: Thursday, December 14

This blog has had over 200 comments, not all of them mine. That should be enough evidence of a lively interest in this subject , despite the stated view of many that to discuss it is damaging to the movement.

I would welcome clarification from Kevin and Sophia, but it is clear from their words that they do not support the theory but are interested in discussing it. That is all I have been arguing for, and it seems that by your actions in posting here many of you agree.

» login to post comments | -4 points

out of the realm of possibility?

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 1:33am.
» login to post comments | 6 points

STOP IT!

Stop muddying the water with SPACEBEAMS!

We've already proven explosives were planted INSIDE the towers.

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:35am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

i don't doubt that

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:37am.
» login to post comments | -1 points

No it wasn't a fucking "Energy Weapon"

Stop muddying the waters asshole. People like you are only helping the 9/11 criminals remain on our streets.

And take the word "truth" out of your website that your pimping and replace it wth "DISINFO"

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:44am.
» login to post comments | -5 points

S4, please...

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:47am.
» login to post comments | -4 points

don't you say a god damn

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:49am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

Fuck you AND your disinfo website promotion

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:51am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

what exactly on my site is

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:56am.
» login to post comments | -1 points

All I've seen you post about is debunked SPACEBEAM theories

destroying the twin towers. And HELL NO I'm not going to check out a website from someone who's promoting obvious DISINFO on this website.

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:02am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

is that you Alex censoring

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 4:52am.
» login to post comments | 3 points

Who is Alex?

And if you can read the comments why do you say that they're being censored?

Submitted by YT on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 7:13am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

Alex is "GeorgeWashington," the guy who is

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 7:37am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

on my commnet "what exactly

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 7:54am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

I think there are about 6

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 8:15am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

If you mark this down you

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 9:33am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

"If you mark this down you

"If you mark this down you are helping the criminals."

irrationality level: red

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/13/2006 - 6:20pm.
» login to post comments | 3 points

If you think the owner of this site is a criminal

Why do you keep posting here?

Submitted by YT on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 8:32am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

I have not called anyone a

I have not called anyone a criminal. I am not able to make that accusation without more proof.

Alex Floum does not own this site. It is the premier 911 forum and as such is the proper place to debate these issues.

Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 8:57am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Are you the one who said he'd be rotting in jail?

No? Then I probably wasn't addressing you.

Submitted by YT on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 9:02am.
» login to post comments | 9 points

"he collapsed it" comments

"he collapsed it"

comments are collapsed when they are lowly rated, not by team members of this site - in this respect we only have a vote - just like everyone else here (via the vote up/down widget).

what would lead you to believe that 'he collapsed it'? this is completely incorrect. it was collapsed because it received at least 3 negative votes with no positive votes. no single person here has the ability to collapse comments, and frankly the team members of this site aren't as obsessed with reading/posting comments here as some. the idea that any one of us is going through hiding comments is misinformation from someone who obviously doesn't understand (or hasn't read about) the comment moderation in place.

as for me, im voting down all the childish behavior on this site as of late, and i would hope that others would as well.

Submitted by dz on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 9:36am.
» login to post comments | -1 points

I'm very glad to hear it.

I'm very glad to hear it. Does that include my blog, since you haven't rated it?

Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 10:15am.
» login to post comments | 9 points

how do you know i haven't

how do you know i haven't rated it?

as for the comments, i've voted most of them down as this thread got really nasty apparently.

back to work, email me if i misunderstood what you were asking.

Submitted by dz on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 10:25am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

Just guessing, There are

Just guessing,

There are some much, much nastier threads that I wouldnt touch with a barge pole, as we say in Norfolk.

Now I have to work too.

Submitted by Andrew Lowe Watson on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 10:36am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

keep in mind that my site is

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:57am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

That explains a lot!

.

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:04am.
» login to post comments | 1 point

also one of the main reasons

also one of the main reasons everyone bolted...

Submitted by imgstacke on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:07am.
» login to post comments | 0 points

and by the way stallion...

and by the way stallion... what have you done for this movement? anything? have you done any origional research or activism? or do you just like attacking people on 911 blogger and think you're doing somethign for this movement by doing so?

Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 2:59am.
» login to post comments | -3 points

HA

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]
Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:06am.
» login to post comments | -2 points

i've asked what you've done

i've asked what you've done for 9/11 truth? it appears that you havn't done anything, which is what i suspected. Also, i've done more than just my website. I've written two small papers, and i'm 90% done my 70 page paper on norman mineta... i'm part of vancouver 9/11 truth, and i go out and hand out flyers, dvd's etc. i've donated money to those who i felt needed it, let alone the money i spent getting my website looking the way it is. so again, what have you done? and again, you critized my site for being disinfo, and you've never even looked at the site?!?!? are you kidding me? shut the fuck up and go do something productive, and stop critizing people like me who have sacrificed their time and money to do something productive for 9/11 truth.

Submitted by truth911.net on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:22am.
» login to post comments | 4 points

Get over yourself

You don't know me or what I've done. Google "stallion4 + 9/11" and you'll see how long I've been in this struggle (on the internet anyway). And for nitwit's like you to come along and start promoting debunked nonsense about SPACEBEAMS taking down the towers is a fucking insult not only to me, but to everyone else who's invested time in exposing the 9/11 cover-up. Try telling a 9/11 victim's family member about your SAPCEBEAM theory killing their loved one and tell us all how they feel about. You should be goddamned ashamed of yourself.

Submitted by stallion4 on Tue, 12/12/2006 - 3:40am.