Kevin Barrett on Directed Energy Weapons aka "Space Beams"

"I would urge people to go take a look at this material".

''I think we don't really need any kind of unanimity from researchers''

''I don't think this is doing any permanent harm to the 9/11 movement ''

''I think people who are blowing it up into something really huge are either sort of panicking or just making a tactical mistake''

''...people who are really sort of allergic to the idea that some kind of unconventional technology might have been used. ''

''[the perpetrators] would have taken advantage of the most advancement technologies of deception and demolition, and in fact they would have arranged it in such a way that anyone who figured out exactly what happened and described it accurately would sound completely insane''

''So, I wouldn't rule out anything and I think we need to allow researchers to pursue their own path,''

''we need to criticize each other in a hopefully amicable manner''

Thank you, Kevin Barrett, for your support.

Andrew Lowe Watson, 911 Truth campaigner

or is working for the 9/11 criminals.

beams??? I've never heard that Barrett was into that junk before.

Barrett said them on his show last Saturday:

Truth Jihad Radio
Host: Kevin Barrett Ph.D.
Time: Saturday 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm

December 9, 2006
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Barrett/0612/20061209_Sat_Barrett1.mp3

It really sucks to see Barrett repeating those lines. It's hard to believe he's that naive.

'Repeating'? He was simply stating his view.

You make an excellent point. They would use whatever they needed to to get the job done. Nevertheless, I think Fetzer should be doing his research on his own and quietly instead of controlling the scholars. He's either got a big ego and a few marbles loose or he's deliberately misleading. 50/50

it is a false dichotomy to pretend that you are simply standing up for an open-minded debate on science.

none of this nonsense is worthy of debate on a scientific level, but, more importantly, there has been enough of a track-record established by the proponents of these theories, and their relationship to 9/11 hit-squads that smear and slander other activists - and their advocacy of entities like WingTV that at one time advocated violence against 911 activists (branding them war criminals and calling for their executions) - and their relationship to serial disinformation campaigns like pods and mini-nukes and keebler elves and no-planes and TVFakery and missiles and holograms that SATURATE the internet - and known connections to rabidly anti-semitic literature like Criminal Politics that is CLEAR cointelpro designed and distributed to discredit this movement - and past histories that show a CLEAR track record of disinformation and slander (such as Fetzer's past claims that the Zapruder (spelling?)Film was a hoax - and accusations of 'agent' against anyone who disagreed with him) - and the obvious close ties to the Bush administration Morgan Reynolds coincidentally enjoys - and the organized disruption of live events that Nico Haupt and his cronies have engaged in for the last 5 years.

The idea Andrew that I should ENTERTAIN this idea of "energy beams" that is being floated by this SAME nexus of con men (and women)is frankly an insult to my intelligence, and to the intelligence of everyone here.

What i WILL do is release my new film after my Boston gig, and let the masses decide for themselves.

SURELY, being the OPEN MINDED advocate of free speech that you are you should have no problem with my presenting their work - and their own quotes - and their histories - and their affiliations within the movement. Surely, they all must stand by everything they have said in the past. Right? I give no opinions, i simply assemble their own words and deeds and allow it to speak for itself.

That should be no problem - right?

(eom)

at organized disruption - and such an obvious attempt to create divisions.

this film is only a short-subject film about disinformation, junk science and cointelpro in the movement - silly tin foil hat theories like space beams and mini-nukes and pods and no planes and keebler elves and holograms and pods and missiles and lies.

are you saying WTC 7 falls into that catagory? are you suggesting that WTC 7 falls into the same catagory as these other theories?

hrmppfff.... hrmppff.....

go get a real job. you guys get more transparent everyday.

I think ALW was thinking of the remake of EGLS, which has been discussed here. He may not know about your disinfo film.

ALW *may* be interested in fomenting organized disruption, but I honestly don't think that's what was happening here. I think it was an honest mistake.

http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Dan06.html

My computer was freezing (or was actually a fake cgi-generated laptop being space beam'ed with mini nukes) so I didn't see you on the callers list. Feel free to make a call tomorrow.

-DL

Just be sure to read that quote... thanks.

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

I enjoyed the show... you talk too fast though.

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

.....and should never be far from all truthers' hearts and minds as we seek truth and justice....

http://villagevoice.com/news/0648%2Clombardi%2C75156%2C2.html

I do not see how questioning the official 9/11 story is part of these lawsuits. If controlled demolition is part of these lawsuits, it will not be decided on public opinion of alternate theories, but will be decided on court-tested fact.

I agree with that totally, Unfortunately in your case you have identified the crime but jumped to conclusions - wrong conclusions - about who it was referring to.

I was trying to warn you a week or so not to keep attacking and 'denouncing' Fetzer but you wouldn't listen. Now, frankly , your credibility is on the line, as is that of Professor Jones who has tried to crush the exotic weapons theories. I had a feeling this would happen. I did warn you.

That's funny. It's especially funny considering the one making this statement has endorsed "TV Fakery, Mini-Nukes, Energy Beams", and so on.

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

My interest in all these areas is public knowledge. I am not in the least embarrassed to admit that. Any more than you are about saying you have serious doubts about controlled disinformation. It's a broad church - isn't it?

You have to remember to email me stuff like this. I need every scrap of evidence I can get.

If you just pick my brain. I know A LOT, but most of it comes up when someone else brings up a topic, etc...

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

sounds messy