you have no credibility with anyone to start with. what exactly is your point?

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

As a non-anonymous poster who is trying to convince people of a certain point of view, you should be concerned about your credibility. Threats do not help your case, at all.

He obviously doesn't care about anything except his own ignorant beliefs.

In fact, I'm going to come out and actually say that it's possible that he's a genuine disinfo agent. When topics such as TV-Fakery and Star Wars Beam Weapons come out, he does nothing but discourage others from even considering it. He does this by making people feel silly about even thinking of investigating it. Genuine disinfo tactic.

Amen to that. I've already deleted my bookmark to 'scholars' and will no longer tune in to his show on RBN. The guy's critical thinking skills and judgment are sorely lacking. See you Jim - we now know who you are.

No one is debating whether or not it's right or wrong to consider alternate theories. Everyone who is here is doing that right now when they object to the official theories.

We are debating whether or not it is correct to advance theories which are easily debunked by overwhelming evidence and common sense.

Scientific Method: When evidence contradicts a theory it must be rejected.

End of story. Some are forgetting the rejection part. They want to cling to their theories like they are their children. It's not science, and it's not even common sense.

If there are 10 points of evidence to support a conclusion and none to contradict; this is a strong theory.

When one piece of evidence might support a theory and 10 points contradict; it is a bad theory and must be rejected.

Contradictory evidence demands rejection of a theory.

I have a strong suspicion this logic is being ignored by people who want to discredit us by presenting weak and outlandish theories. They want to cause “guilt by association”.

We need to learn how to distinguish credible facts from those that are not.

This is how the battle for the truth is won. They don’t want us to win this war--they want us to lose, and they will do anything to achieve this victory. We saw this on 9/11 when they considered 3000 people expendable.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

Kevin Barrett on Directed Energy Weapons aka "Space Beams"

"I would urge people to go take a look at this material".

''I think we don't really need any kind of unanimity from researchers''

''I don't think this is doing any permanent harm to the 9/11 movement ''

''I think people who are blowing it up into something really huge are either sort of panicking or just making a tactical mistake''

''...people who are really sort of allergic to the idea that some kind of unconventional technology might have been used. ''

''[the perpetrators] would have taken advantage of the most advancement technologies of deception and demolition, and in fact they would have arranged it in such a way that anyone who figured out exactly what happened and described it accurately would sound completely insane''

''So, I wouldn't rule out anything and I think we need to allow researchers to pursue their own path,''

''we need to criticize each other in a hopefully amicable manner''

Thank you, Kevin Barrett, for your support.

Andrew Lowe Watson, 911 Truth campaigner

"He is not taken seriously in the scientific community for his involvement with ColdFusion."

I hope your not confusing Prof. Jones work in muon catalyzed fusion with those hacks at the University of Utah, Pons and Fleishmann?

physicsweb.org : Whatever happened to cold fusion?

"A couple of palladium electrodes in heavy water and any high-school kid could do it, it was said. Pons, in the chemistry department at the University of Utah, and his mentor Martin Fleischmann, of Southampton University in the UK, claimed at the press conference in 1989 that they had fused deuterium nuclei using routine electrochemical techniques on their lab bench. This was a huge claim to make - nuclear fusion had been thought possible only at temperatures in excess of a million degrees, when nuclei could overcome Coulomb repulsion. The only cold fusion that had been detected until then was the kind mediated by muons, seen in accelerator experiments in the 1950s, and then only at minuscule rates."

Jones' work has nothing to do with the approach of Pons and Fleishmann.  Methinks the gremlins are getting past the BS filters...

The whole Steve Jones/Jim Fetzer/Judy Wood/Morgan Reynolds implosion seems staged to me. Think about it. You have Steve Jones and his Mormonism /CF involvement, Jim Fetzer and his shotty JFK work, Judy Wood and her SPACEBEAMS, Morgan Reynolds and his cartoon planes "research". This whole thing was by design IMO.

By the way, my BS detector is just fine. You might want to check the batteries in yours, though.

I respect your opinion and that's certainly a scenario I've gone over in my mind.

I think all the drama may be a reaction to the fact that Jones is a serious scientist -- and almost the entirety of the scientific establishment has agreed to play dumb on this.

I couldn't care less if he's a Mormon. And no, I haven't watched the documentary yet.

But it's a built-in reason for others to not trust or take him seriously as a scientist.

Believe what you want, but I believe he's in on it. I might change my mind down the road, but for now, I don't trust him, or Fetzer, or Wood, or Reynolds.