"Perhaps alternative explanations, however bizarre, need to be examined."

i kind of disagree with this unless those alternative explanations are kept private and/or seperate from other legitimate and highly provable assertions regarding 9/11 altnerate theories.

i dont mind somebody wanting to do serious research on such a wild theory, however i think by focusing on it and publically talking about such issues does nothing BUT harm the credibility of the truth movement. TO me its the same deal as the no-planers, sure there is a .000000001 % chance that those planes are actually holograms, but please dont talk about it, its embarassing.

"What about the burn out wrecks on the FDR Drive"

i think this was cherry picked evidence to support the space weapon theory similar to the "powderized" core/spire time lapse you see Judy Wood pushing. In other words it wouldnt surprise me at all if those cars were moved to another location.

It's not just that they were "burned" in a typical manner. Rather, paint and steel were etched in a manner I've never seen. Metal door frames sagged, yet their plastic door panels didn't even melt. Windows in fire trucks exploded outward, in otherwise lightly damaged vehicles.

And, there is new focus on the fact that every building with a WTC prefix was utterly demolished, some with gaping, multi-story chasms within them. This would be easily explained by falling debris from WTC 1 & 2, except the voids in the buildings are nearly empty, hollow holes.

I lend no credence to "space beams", but there is some damn interesting new stuff on ST911 about this, for which I can form no logical explanation from known mechanisms. 

 As for the burned cars on FDR, that was a confusing day to say the least. But the cars look as if they were not towed to that location. Some are very askew, most are covered in WTC dust. Again, no endorsement, but a call from craniac for others to view the new information and respond.

 "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know it - now" - Patrick Henry

Again, CB, "truthers" like you are using pictures with zero context or background information to make your self detective crime solvers. This is no different then Woods pointing out that Jones used a picture of research team at ground zero "peering into an inferno" as proof of molten metal at ground zero. It's sad and all you weekend crime solvers do is hurt everyday the chances of getting a real investigation in 9/11. It's sad that you don't know how to point your "energy" in the right direction instead of bantering about burnt cars. Speculate all you want, all you doing in hurting your country be making the truth movement look like a bunch of teenage losers out for a smoke on a freezing 10 below day during lunch time.

"In the debate over toasted cars ignited by this article, some have argued that the wrecked vehicles on FDR drive were damaged at the WTC and were loaded up and transported and dumped on FDR drive for storage. First, there is no evidence that this was done. Second, it makes no sense to load up wrecks, transport them, only to dump them in a busy thoroughfare for storage. These wrecks would have had to be picked up yet again and transported again. If vehicles were truly moved from the WTC to FDR Drive, we wonder why WTC beams were not stacked up on FDR drive, as well, if it was such a good storage area. Third, governments may be stupid, but we doubt they could be this inefficient. If reported, it would have been a minor scandal. Fourth, we might be wrong about the facts here, but it looks like the motive for this speculation about shifting wrecks around lower Manhattan is to protect the official story or thermite story or other pet theories. We fail to see any other explanation for such a "forced" interpretation for these photographs. Fifth, marks on the roadway suggest that some of these vehicles were pushed to the side of the roadway until they could be removed. For example, see this figure. This is a more natural explanation for why some of the cars appear to have been moved from where they were damaged rather than all the way from the WTC."

From Here

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

>Furthermore, I have been highly sceptical to the claims of "space weapons", and think that Dr Jones' work so far explains the collapse of the towers far better. HOWEVER I am drawn to the issue of the burnt out cars today, by Jim Fetzer.<

I've seen some of these pictures too, but I would include the ones in the parking garage as part of the anomaly due to their uneven damage.

Fact is there are electromagnetic devices that could cause some of these effects, but you don't need to reach for "space beams". Actually that's a misnomer; you'd be reaching for an orbital platform, which a high powered amature telescope should be able to pick out. Considering the obviousness of such a thing, and the inability to hide it, this part of the alternate theory is VERY doubtful.

But a terrestrial based energy source, that was perhaps used to produce an EMP to knock out communications? I don't know.

But if one IS going to investigate this do it with these caveats, PLEASE:

1: be clear you ARE NOT representing 911Truth or the strongest evidence against the government. This is a side curiousity that may have significance in time but is not nessecary NOW to put the bastards in prison.

2: approach the evidence properly: physically examine cars if you can; check the tow companies and see if they have arrangements to store damaged cars along the public way; find out how many vehicles were damaged that day; research insurance claims--what does the adjuster say?

3: then compile your evidence accordingly and do experiments on a small scale, trying to replicate the effects. Yes, people preform high frequency experiments as a HOBBY all the time--if you're a scientist you should be able to get access to the right equipment.

4: not in a position to do the above? Pass these guidelines on to Dr. Wood, et al. Please--and do not confuse this research with activism.

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.