Stallion dude, just to let you know I had to take down the Craig Bartmer interview from google, he said he was getting harassed or some shit by assholes that he used to work with because of it. I didn’t want to do it on one level but he seemed kind of stressed by it being up there, so I thought it was the right thing to do, sorry about that man!

Wow that's too bad. I was wondering what happened to it.

I transcribed some of his interview if anyone wants it:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/4095#comment-84582

http://www.digg.com/political_opinion/Ten_Reasons_To_Impeach_The_Preside...

Don't forget to mention that fears of Peak Oil reality may be THE issue that ties and spins all of these lies. IMO, it's all about energy security.

show them a clip of WTC7 collapsing.

As about 90% of the population does not know that a THIRD skyscraper collapsed that day, this will usually wake them up and show how the MSM has been quiet about this...

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

That's what did it for me -- I must have had subliminal doubts all along, but once I saw the WTC7 clip I flipped to the bright side in seconds.

It accomplishes three things immediately: makes one realize that the press has blacked out information, demonstrates a gaping hole in the official story, and produces a desire to look further into it.

Almost makes me want to purchase a mini video device and carry it with me everywhere I go.

....and then, as a friend of mine so perfectly put it, "watch their face melt"....

Works every time.

Also, if you can then give them the "11 Remarkable Facts about 9/11" card by the estimable Ken Jenkins, as a follow-up, it's even better....

To obtain those cards go to:
www.911sharethetruth.com

get an iPod...

I had my doubts after looking at Hunt the Boeing but once I watched building 7 on In Plane Site that was it. Flawed as it was with the pod theory and what not, it included building 7.

That's why I've always found it suspicious when people say ignore the Pentagon and ignore the demolitions. Puh-leeze. Hundreds of hours of public truthing confirms my position--when people have to resort to "the plane vaporized" and "the building fell because of fire and debris" they begin to look and sound like the moonbats they accuse us of being.

Turn it right around on them. Ask them if they really believe that 7 just... fell. And then offer to sell them beachfront property in Kansas.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

A 1-minute informational on just WTC 7, aired prime time, could do wonders. It should show 3 different videos of its collapse, followed by the relevant facts in a nutshell -- including the fact that the fall accelerated at the rate of free fall.

It should NOT contain the "Pull it" statement, as that would allow the shills to concentrate on debunking it.

My own kids tried to convince me this was an inside job and for weeks I told them they were crazy...our government wouldn't do this to its own people. I agreed to sit down to a video clip of building 7 and my life hasn't been the same ever since. It is the true smoking gun. Obvious controlled demolition to anyone that takes the time to look. It's just a matter of connecting the dots from that point forward.

Amazing to see such a well orchestrated plan of attack...and then this faux pax. What were they thinking? No one is gonna see this 47 story mammoth building disappear in 6 seconds?

Osama Bin Laden not wanted in connection to 9-11 attacks. He isn't wanted for 9-11! On the FBI's MOST WANTED LIST. The FBI could not find hard evidence linking him to 9-11. "Oh yeah, then is that why he isn't wanted in connection to 9-11 on the FBI's MOST WANTED LIST. C'mon," When people feel that they have been outsmarted in a conversation, they will race to find out your information is wrong, but when they find out the truth, they will take note. And then they will face to feel the exhilaration of knowing more than someone else, and curiosity will kill the cat, but satisfaction will bring it back.

I just bought a portable 7 in widescreen Philips DVD player from AMAZON for $125 so that I can show Bldg 7 as I give away DVDs. I have made more than 2,100 copies of various films.
Most recently it is a Terrorstorm/911 Mysteries on a single disc.
I think that showing a clip will greatly increase the chances of someone actually watching the film (which is about all that it takes).

I have not yet gone out to test the approach. Will soon and will report back.

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. M Gandhi

Convince them to watch Loose Change in its entirety.

Waiting for the final cut of Loose Change to unleash my onslaught of information.... hoping it's coming soon..... I have a theater lined up for showing

going to show Loose Change every Friday for 4 weeks followed by different film every week.... Beyond Treason.... 9/11 Mysteries..... Who Killed John ONeil.... Press for Truth

How do we know the identities of the hijackers? According to Popular Mechanics, the FBI claims to have DNA evidence. Where did they get orignial samples for matching? And how how did they know the names so soon? This is impossible. Even the FBI Director has admitted the hijackers are still a mystery.

Also, the flight into the Pentagon, according to the NTSB was a corkscrew dive that would have created a force of 7 G's, meaning a 150 pound pilot would suddenly weigh more than 1,000 pounds and be rendered unable to hold the controls. Again, impossible.

You don't need to convict anyone, nor do you have to say it is an inside job. People will conclude that for themselves. All you have to do is show the official story to be impossible, and say we need an open investigation until the crime is solved. Do not try to fully explain anything you cannot. Do not engage in speculation.

All you have to do is show the official story to be impossible, and say we need an open investigation until the crime is solved.

Do not try to fully explain anything you cannot.

Do not engage in speculation.

Telegraph.co.uk
By David Harrison
(Filed: 23/09/2001)

Revealed: the men with stolen identities

excerpt:

"Saudi Airlines said it was considering legal action against the FBI for seriously damaging its reputation and that of its pilots. The FBI released the list of 19 suicide terrorists three days after the attacks.

The statement said that the 19 "have been identified as hijackers aboard the four airliners". Photographs and personal details were published around the world with an appeal for "information about these individuals, even though they are presumed dead".

The Saudi Airlines pilot, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, 25, and Abdulaziz Al-Omari, an engineer from Riyadh, are furious that the hijackers' "personal details" - including name, place, date of birth and occupation - matched their own.

Mr Al-Ghamdi was named as a terrorist on the United Airlines flight that crashed in Pennsylvania - a plane said by some experts to have been heading for the White House.

He first knew that he was on the FBI's list when he was told by a colleague. Speaking from Tunisia, he said: "I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have been based in Tunis with 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320. The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks.

"You cannot imagine what it is like to be described as a terrorist - and a dead man - when you are innocent and alive." The airline was angry too. Officials brought Mr Al-Ghamdi back to Saudi Arabia last week for a 10-day holiday to avoid arrest or interrogation.

An official said: "We are consulting lawyers about what action to take to protect the reputation of our pilots." Mr Al-Ghamdi faced further embarrassment when CNN, the American television network, flashed a photograph of him around the world, naming him as a hijack suspect."

somebody should try to interview those guys, on video at best,but maybe they aren't interested,but one would think they would like to be cleared.Their faces are shown repeatedly over again and again on tv.

The so-called "debunkers" usually respond to the claim that "the hijackers are still alive" with one of two retorts: (1) the real hijackers were using stolen identities, or (2) the BBC has since corrected its original report and now does not claim to have located the actual hijackers (the BBC did, in fact, change its online story, thereby rewriting history).

I would focus instead on what Peter Dale Scott said the other week: according to the FBI, it identified 18 of 19 hijackers by 9:59am on 9/11. According to the NORAD tapes, the military didn't even know Flight 93 was hijacked until 10:07, after it had crashed (this is how the military explains why it did not intercept 93; it is also a lie).

So, taking the government at its own words, we are to believe that 3 of 4 hijackers on UA93 were identified by the FBI before the military even knew the plane was hijacked. This is impossible, and there is no rebuttal involving BBC's journalistic practices.

Thanks for highlighting yet another inconsistency in the official version.

Cheers,
B

Where does the FBI say it identified 18 of 19 hijackers by 9:59. This is the second time Ive heard this and wasnt aware of it...any link?
Thanks