Recent Headlines

Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Common Dreams Article Connects the Dots

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

This is a fantastic article -- and I know that much of the gate-keeping left keeps up with the Common Dreams site. Hope it shames them to hell.

Published on Sunday, December 3, 2006 by CommonDreams.org

The Surreal Politics of Premeditated War

by R.W. Behan


http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1203-21.htm

Here is an excerpt:

The story of George Bush’s premeditated wars now enters its final chapter. The catastrophic event takes place. A hijacked airliner probably en route to the White House crashes in Pennsylvania, the Pentagon is afire, and the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center are rubble. In the first hours of frenetic response, fully aware of al Qaeda’s culpability, both President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld seek frantically to link Saddam Hussein to the attacks, we know from on site-witnesses. They are anxious to proceed with their planned invasion. And less than a week later, at a meeting of the National Security Council, President Bush ordered the Defense Department to be ready to handle Iraq, “possibly occupying Iraqi oil fields.”

The controversies rage on yet today about the events of September 11, 2001. No steel building has ever collapsed from fire alone. Buildings falling precisely into their footprints are the marks of deliberate (and expert) demolition. The faulty construction/foreshortened lifespan/insurance angle. The collapse of a third building that was not hit at all. The short-selling of airline stock in previous days. The Pentagon hit by a missile, not a civilian airliner. Michael Rupert’s book “Crossing the Rubicon” lays the blame for 9/11 directly at Dick Cheney’s feet. Senator Robert Dole’s former chief of staff, Mr. Stanley Hilton, claims he can prove George Bush signed an order authorizing the attacks. Half the people polled in New York city believed the Bush Administration had prior knowledge of the attack, and “consciously failed” to act. Et cetera. (Conspiracy is forever easier to see than to find, but that does not obviate the need to seek thoroughly the whole truth about 9/11, and that has yet to be done.)

Involving the Bush Administration in the execution of 9/11, or even accommodating their informed inaction, is almost too appalling to contemplate. But if they needed a reason to proceed with their planned invasions, they could not have been handed a more fortuitous and spectacular excuse. 9/11 was a criminal act of terrorism, not a violation of our entire nation’s security. Comparing it, as the Bush Administration immediately did, to Pearl Harbor was ludicrous: the hijacked airliners were not the vanguard of a formidable naval armada, an air force, and a standing army ready to engage in all out war, as the Japanese were prepared to do and did in 1941.

9/11 was a shocking event of unprecedented scale, but to characterize it as an invasion of national security was criminal. It was creating reality. It was also, and in the extreme, surreal, because the Bush Administration chose consciously to frighten the American people beyond any conceivable necessity. It adopted fear mongering as a mode of governance. As not a few disinterested observers noted at the time, international criminal terrorism is best countered by international police action, which Israel and other nations have proven many times over to be effective.

 

Really worth reading the whole thing.

I'm going to give this article to one of my "not interested in 9/11" lefty friends. It's perfect in that it makes an understated case for the need to answer many real questions about 9/11 and puts 9/11 right in the center of a foreign policy critique. (None of that Cindy Sheehan follower crap about "We need to stop the war before it's reasonable to look at 9/11.") It's also a pleasant antidote to all the left venom recently spewed at us psychologically deranged tinfoil hatters.

This needs to be!

Mailed to every congressman,and senator! Enough is enough!
We the people DEMAND answers!

The gatekeepers slowly open

The gatekeepers slowly open the way. Beware Truthers, the coming investigation will be run by globalist with a strong desire to dismantle the USA and create the NAU with its new currency the Amero, with a new Constitution more akin to China's rule of Law as opposed to glorious Constitution of the USA. I'm glad they are moving in for the kill on the factions which have carried out these murderous acts on American citizens, but as soon as it is certain that we have the culprits we should be prepared to turn on international headhunters. You can certainly bet on a new 911 investigation.

re:The gatekeepers slowly open

Ya, Common Dreams has almost never said anything 9/11. I already knew practically everthing in that article but it is nice to see a gatekeeper site print something like that. I guess maybe the worm is finally turning.

To me, this is the article you give to....

...liberal friends who believe Bush is guilty and has lied everry other time with regard to all the other crimes committed by this Administration (no WMDs, torture, spying on Americans, etc.), but can't believe these people could be behind 9/11.

This article gives context to everything before and after 9/11 and shows how it fits in "perfectly" and was, in their eyes, for their criminal schemes, "completely necessary".....

i used to read

i used to read CommonDreams.org all the time before i knew about things like 9/11. this is surprising. does anybody know who this Richard W. Behan guy is?

.

.

You don't say...

You don't say...

Funny....

:)

I sometimes accidentally post something twice and don't know how to remove all of the second one...so, being an idiot, I just take out the content...

Enlighten me please on how to do that.

Thanks.

I had submitted this to dz this morning for posting...

....I'm glad somebody else saw it also...I think it's an excellent summation of the last 6 years....really puts 9/11 in context with all that's happened before and since.....

Definitely think this would be a great article for all those that can't quite make themselves believe in US government complicity in 9/11.

This goes a long way toward explaining Motive for US involvement and making it believable to people new or resistent to 9/11 Truth.

The author gives a "this is speculation" disclaimer, but this article is loaded with facts that give meaning to each other.

Long but well worth the read ....

It's a shame that all those that need to read it probably won't even see it.
I printed the 6 pages out and will give copies of them to my friends who are sitting on the fence so to say. Maybe this will convince them.
I encourage everyone to use the link and read the entire article.

On my way home from work last night...

Rhandi Rhodes was reading this entire article on Air America. She gave it mega kudos and I felt proud of her and the author of this article.

---From a decon @ my church: "I want to tell you something very serious..very serious, but I don't want you to say 'I told you so'. I want you to forgive me..You were right. I know the truth about 9/11.

I heard Rhodes reading this yesterday

It was good to hear her speak the words "9/11" again. Since Mike Malloy was fired and Garrafalo stepped down(?), I thought all the other Air America Radio hosts had taken heed to shut up about all things related to 9/11 truth.

This article nails it in a very logical and concise manner that is extremely difficult to refute. Thus, the other leftwing gatekeepers will probably just ignore it.

I'm glad Rhodes chose to share it with her audience. Very powerful statement.

Speaking of Garofalo, has

Speaking of Garofalo, has anyone heard anything about/from her? She's been mysteriously and conspicuously MIA as of late.

I gave up on AA a little

I gave up on AA a little after Malloy got axed.
I listened to Rhoades a few times and it seemed like all she was interested in doing was driving home the DNC party lines. BORING, and that gets absolutely nothing done. The system is rigged and listening to her was depressing.

Maybe she's turned over a new leaf, but I doubt it. She's fully aware of 9/11 truth but refuses to discuss it because of course there are more "important" things like how corrupt all the republicans are.

Good read...

With the exception of the Stanley Hilton reference. He has proof Bush signed off on it? Ok then... where is it so we can end the war against civil liberties, the war against freedom, the war against democracy, the war against Afghanistan and Iraq, and so on...

Otherwise, an exceptional read.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

What's wrong with mentioning

What's wrong with mentioning Stanley Hilton?

That wasn't a rhetorical

That wasn't a rhetorical question.

Have you seen...

The supposed documentation he has?

"We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East."

Um, do you think now is a good time to release these "very incriminating documents?" Where are the "eye-witnesses?"

He said that on 9/10/2004 on Alex Jones' radio show. Don't you think THEN would have been a good time to release the supposed documentation? How about AS SOON AS HE SUPPOSEDLY FOUND IT?


"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

Well he said he saw them not

Well he said he saw them not that he has them. Seems very weak to me though, I agree.

Sorry?

"We have some very incriminating documents"



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

Oops. Sorry.

Oops. Sorry.

No...

Problem.



"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."

Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member

a good start

to a soft landing. I'm almost tempted to not bring up the fact that the writer of this article mentions Israel only once, and I quote

"As not a few disinterested observers noted at the time, international criminal terrorism is best countered by international police action, which Israel and other nations have proven many times over to be effective."

Hmmm. OK. So, what's the number for the International Police Department? I want to report 5 dancing Israelis at the scene of the 9/11 crimes.

What about Larry Silverstein? Will the international police arrest HIM for us? I notice his name is also conspicuous by its absence in this article.

So the question is back to what do we make of a normally left-gatekeeping site that suddenly seems more open to discussing 9/11 than ever before? Well, let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Let's pass this one around to every Cindy Sheehan and Amy Goodman fan we know. Also, let's see what Gnome thinks of it.

But let's not force open one gate and become complacent. This is par for the gatekeeping course. Let's keep up the pressure for an indictment of Larry Silverstein for fraud, arson, murder, and racketeering, and for an investigation into the extent and nature of Israeli involvement in 9/11 in the context of their vast campaign of espionage against America.

Was 9/11 simply a crime? Or was it a covert act of war as well? Were our traitors working alone? Or did they have help?

Ask questions. Demand answers. And hold accountable everyone involved.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

Do you have any links to

Do you have any links to evidence implicating Silverstein other than his pull it comment?

Yes. Means, Motive, and Opportunity.

More than enough for an indictment. But of course an investigation would reveal a lot more.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

oh yeah, and...

destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, tampering with a crime scene. you see, as the owner he is liable for all of these things that we know happened. Since he has offered no plausible explanation for any of it we should proceed to indict him and try him.

Is there a problem here? I don't see it. Unless it's the fact that the man is not in jail.

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

Would you provide links to

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

I'm sure you're capable of finding the links

to many articles that establish without a doubt that he purchased a lease on the towers and insured them shortly before they were deliberately destroyed with explosives.

If I rent an apartment from you and take out an insurance policy on it, and six weeks later your apartment burns down making me rich, wouldn't you assume I had something to do with it? Wouldn't the police investigate me? If not, then... do you have an apartment I could rent? :)

Why are you playing dumb? Do you work for Silverstein?

____

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

 

ahh, it's the typical smug

ahh, it's the typical smug post looking for our evidence meanwhile they don't ask the same sort of questions about the official story..